v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
708 APPENDIX E. PROJECTIONE.2 I−P , Projection on algebraic complementIt follows from the diagonalizability of idempotent matrices that I − P mustalso be a projection matrix because it too is idempotent, and because it maybe expressedm∑I − P = S(I − Φ)S −1 = (1 − φ i )s i wi T (1901)where (1 − φ i ) ∈ {1, 0} are the eigenvalues of I − P (1452) whoseeigenvectors s i ,w i are identical to those of P in (1892). A consequence ofthat complementary relationship of eigenvalues is the fact, [343,2] [338,2]for subspace projector P = P 2 ∈ R m×mR(P ) = span {s i | φ i = 1 ∀i} = span {s i | (1 − φ i ) = 0 ∀i} = N(I − P )N(P ) = span {s i | φ i = 0 ∀i} = span {s i | (1 − φ i ) = 1 ∀i} = R(I − P )R(P T ) = span {w i | φ i = 1 ∀i} = span {w i | (1 − φ i ) = 0 ∀i} = N(I − P T )N(P T ) = span {w i | φ i = 0 ∀i} = span {w i | (1 − φ i ) = 1 ∀i} = R(I − P T )(1902)that is easy to see from (1892) and (1901). Idempotent I −P thereforeprojects vectors on its range: N(P ). Because all eigenvectors of a realidempotent matrix are real and independent, the algebraic complement ofR(P ) [227,3.3] is equivalent to N(P ) ; E.6 id est,R(P )⊕N(P ) = R(P T )⊕N(P T ) = R(P T )⊕N(P ) = R(P )⊕N(P T ) = R mi=1(1903)because R(P ) ⊕ R(I −P )= R m . For idempotent P ∈ R m×m , consequently,rankP + rank(I − P ) = m (1904)E.2.0.0.1 Theorem. Rank/Trace. [393,4.1 prob.9] (confer (1921))P 2 = P⇔rankP = trP and rank(I − P ) = tr(I − P )(1905)E.6 The same phenomenon occurs with symmetric (nonidempotent) matrices, for example.When summands in A ⊕ B = R m are orthogonal vector spaces, the algebraic complementis the orthogonal complement.⋄
E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 709E.2.1Universal projector characteristicAlthough projection is not necessarily orthogonal and R(P )̸⊥ R(I − P ) ingeneral, still for any projector P and any x∈ R mPx + (I − P )x = x (1906)must hold where R(I − P )= N(P ) is the algebraic complement of R(P).The algebraic complement of closed convex cone K , for example, is thenegative dual cone −K ∗ . (2023)E.3 Symmetric idempotent matricesWhen idempotent matrix P is symmetric, P is an orthogonal projector. Inother words, the direction of projection of point x∈ R m on subspace R(P )is orthogonal to R(P ) ; id est, for P 2 =P ∈ S m and projection Px∈ R(P )Px − x ⊥ R(P ) in R m (1907)(confer (1898)) Perpendicularity is a necessary and sufficient condition fororthogonal projection on a subspace. [109,4.9]A condition equivalent to (1907) is: Norm of direction x −Px is theinfimum over all nonorthogonal projections of x on R(P ) ; [250,3.3] forP 2 =P ∈ S m , R(P )= R(A) , matrices A,B, Z and positive integer k asdefined for (1886), and given x∈ R m‖x − Px‖ 2 = ‖x − AA † x‖ 2 = infB∈R n×k ‖x − A(A † + BZ T )x‖ 2 = dist(x, R(P ))(1908)The infimum is attained for R(B)⊆ N(A) over any affine subset ofnonorthogonal projectors (1888) indexed by k .Proof is straightforward: The vector 2-norm is a convex function. Settinggradient of the norm-square to 0, applyingD.2,(A T ABZ T − A T (I − AA † ) ) xx T A = 0⇔(1909)A T ABZ T xx T A = 0because A T = A T AA † . Projector P =AA † is therefore unique; theminimum-distance projector is the orthogonal projector, and vice versa.
- Page 657 and 658: C.2. TRACE, SINGULAR AND EIGEN VALU
- Page 659 and 660: C.2. TRACE, SINGULAR AND EIGEN VALU
- Page 661 and 662: C.3. ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTES PROBLEM
- Page 663 and 664: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 665 and 666: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 667 and 668: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 669 and 670: Appendix DMatrix calculusFrom too m
- Page 671 and 672: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 673 and 674: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 675 and 676: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 677 and 678: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 679 and 680: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 681 and 682: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 683 and 684: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 685 and 686: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 687 and 688: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 689 and 690: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 691 and 692: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 693 and 694: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 695 and 696: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 697 and 698: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 699 and 700: Appendix EProjectionFor any A∈ R
- Page 701 and 702: 701U T = U † for orthonormal (inc
- Page 703 and 704: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 703where A
- Page 705 and 706: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 705order,
- Page 707: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 707are lin
- Page 711 and 712: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 713 and 714: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 715 and 716: E.4. ALGEBRA OF PROJECTION ON AFFIN
- Page 717 and 718: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 717a ∗ 2
- Page 719 and 720: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 719where Y
- Page 721 and 722: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 721(B.4.2)
- Page 723 and 724: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 725 and 726: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 727 and 728: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 729 and 730: E.7. PROJECTION ON MATRIX SUBSPACES
- Page 731 and 732: E.7. PROJECTION ON MATRIX SUBSPACES
- Page 733 and 734: E.8. RANGE/ROWSPACE INTERPRETATION
- Page 735 and 736: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 735As
- Page 737 and 738: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 737Wi
- Page 739 and 740: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 739R(
- Page 741 and 742: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 741E.
- Page 743 and 744: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 743E.
- Page 745 and 746: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 745Un
- Page 747 and 748: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 747ac
- Page 749 and 750: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 749bC
- Page 751 and 752: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 7510
- Page 753 and 754: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 753E.1
- Page 755 and 756: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 755y 2
- Page 757 and 758: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 757Def
E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 709E.2.1Universal projector characteristicAlthough projection is not necessarily orthogonal and R(P )̸⊥ R(I − P ) ingeneral, still for any projector P and any x∈ R mPx + (I − P )x = x (1906)must hold where R(I − P )= N(P ) is the algebraic complement of R(P).The algebraic complement of closed convex cone K , for example, is thenegative dual cone −K ∗ . (2023)E.3 Symmetric idempotent matricesWhen idempotent matrix P is symmetric, P is an orthogonal projector. Inother words, the direction of projection of point x∈ R m on subspace R(P )is orthogonal to R(P ) ; id est, for P 2 =P ∈ S m and projection Px∈ R(P )Px − x ⊥ R(P ) in R m (1907)(confer (1898)) Perpendicularity is a necessary and sufficient condition fororthogonal projection on a subspace. [109,4.9]A condition equivalent to (1907) is: Norm of direction x −Px is theinfimum over all nonorthogonal projections of x on R(P ) ; [250,3.3] forP 2 =P ∈ S m , R(P )= R(A) , matrices A,B, Z and positive integer k asdefined for (1886), and given x∈ R m‖x − Px‖ 2 = ‖x − AA † x‖ 2 = infB∈R n×k ‖x − A(A † + BZ T )x‖ 2 = dist(x, R(P ))(1908)The infimum is attained for R(B)⊆ N(A) over any affine subset ofnonorthogonal projectors (1888) indexed by k .Proof is straightforward: The vector 2-norm is a convex function. Settinggradient of the norm-square to 0, applyingD.2,(A T ABZ T − A T (I − AA † ) ) xx T A = 0⇔(1909)A T ABZ T xx T A = 0because A T = A T AA † . Projector P =AA † is therefore unique; theminimum-distance projector is the orthogonal projector, and vice versa.