v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
706 APPENDIX E. PROJECTIONTxT ⊥ R(Q)cone(Q)cone(U)PxFigure 162: Nonorthogonal projection of x∈ R 3 on R(U)= R 2 underbiorthogonality condition; id est, Px=UQ T x such that Q T U =I . Anypoint along imaginary line T connecting x to Px will be projectednonorthogonally on Px with respect to horizontal plane constitutingR 2 = aff cone(U) in this example. Extreme directions of cone(U) correspondto two columns of U ; likewise for cone(Q). For purpose of illustration, wetruncate each conic hull by truncating coefficients of conic combination atunity. Conic hull cone(Q) is headed upward at an angle, out of plane ofpage. Nonorthogonal projection would fail were N(Q T ) in R(U) (were Tparallel to a line in R(U)).
E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 707are linearly independent. Otherwise, any component of x in N(P)= N(Q T )will be annihilated. Direction of nonorthogonal projection is orthogonal toR(Q) ⇔ Q T U =I ; id est, for Px∈ R(U)Px − x ⊥ R(Q) in R m (1898)E.1.1.0.1 Example. Illustration of nonorthogonal projector.Figure 162 shows cone(U) , the conic hull of the columns of⎡ ⎤1 1U = ⎣−0.5 0.3 ⎦ (1899)0 0from nonorthogonal projector P = UQ T . Matrix U has a limitless numberof left inverses because N(U T ) is nontrivial. Similarly depicted is left inverseQ T from (1886)⎡Q = U †T + ZB T = ⎣⎡= ⎣0.3750 0.6250−1.2500 1.25000 00.3750 0.6250−1.2500 1.25000.5000 0.5000⎤⎡⎦ + ⎣⎤⎦001⎤⎦[0.5 0.5](1900)where Z ∈ N(U T ) and matrix B is selected arbitrarily; id est, Q T U = Ibecause U is full-rank.Direction of projection on R(U) is orthogonal to R(Q). Any point alongline T in the figure, for example, will have the same projection. Were matrixZ instead equal to 0, then cone(Q) would become the relative dual tocone(U) (sharing the same affine hull;2.13.8, confer Figure 56a). In thatcase, projection Px = UU † x of x on R(U) becomes orthogonal projection(and unique minimum-distance).E.1.2Idempotence summaryNonorthogonal subspace-projector P is a (convex) linear operator defined byidempotence or biorthogonal decomposition (1889), but characterized not bysymmetry or positive semidefiniteness or nonexpansivity (1917).
- Page 655 and 656: C.2. TRACE, SINGULAR AND EIGEN VALU
- Page 657 and 658: C.2. TRACE, SINGULAR AND EIGEN VALU
- Page 659 and 660: C.2. TRACE, SINGULAR AND EIGEN VALU
- Page 661 and 662: C.3. ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTES PROBLEM
- Page 663 and 664: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 665 and 666: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 667 and 668: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 669 and 670: Appendix DMatrix calculusFrom too m
- Page 671 and 672: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 673 and 674: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 675 and 676: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 677 and 678: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 679 and 680: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 681 and 682: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 683 and 684: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 685 and 686: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 687 and 688: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 689 and 690: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 691 and 692: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 693 and 694: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 695 and 696: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 697 and 698: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 699 and 700: Appendix EProjectionFor any A∈ R
- Page 701 and 702: 701U T = U † for orthonormal (inc
- Page 703 and 704: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 703where A
- Page 705: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 705order,
- Page 709 and 710: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 711 and 712: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 713 and 714: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 715 and 716: E.4. ALGEBRA OF PROJECTION ON AFFIN
- Page 717 and 718: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 717a ∗ 2
- Page 719 and 720: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 719where Y
- Page 721 and 722: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 721(B.4.2)
- Page 723 and 724: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 725 and 726: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 727 and 728: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 729 and 730: E.7. PROJECTION ON MATRIX SUBSPACES
- Page 731 and 732: E.7. PROJECTION ON MATRIX SUBSPACES
- Page 733 and 734: E.8. RANGE/ROWSPACE INTERPRETATION
- Page 735 and 736: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 735As
- Page 737 and 738: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 737Wi
- Page 739 and 740: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 739R(
- Page 741 and 742: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 741E.
- Page 743 and 744: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 743E.
- Page 745 and 746: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 745Un
- Page 747 and 748: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 747ac
- Page 749 and 750: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 749bC
- Page 751 and 752: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 7510
- Page 753 and 754: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 753E.1
- Page 755 and 756: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 755y 2
E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 707are linearly independent. Otherwise, any component of x in N(P)= N(Q T )will be annihilated. Direction of nonorthogonal projection is orthogonal toR(Q) ⇔ Q T U =I ; id est, for Px∈ R(U)Px − x ⊥ R(Q) in R m (1898)E.1.1.0.1 Example. Illustration of nonorthogonal projector.Figure 162 shows cone(U) , the conic hull of the columns of⎡ ⎤1 1U = ⎣−0.5 0.3 ⎦ (1899)0 0from nonorthogonal projector P = UQ T . Matrix U has a limitless numberof left inverses because N(U T ) is nontrivial. Similarly depicted is left inverseQ T from (1886)⎡Q = U †T + ZB T = ⎣⎡= ⎣0.3750 0.6250−1.2500 1.25000 00.3750 0.6250−1.2500 1.25000.5000 0.5000⎤⎡⎦ + ⎣⎤⎦001⎤⎦[0.5 0.5](1900)where Z ∈ N(U T ) and matrix B is selected arbitrarily; id est, Q T U = Ibecause U is full-rank.Direction of projection on R(U) is orthogonal to R(Q). Any point alongline T in the figure, for example, will have the same projection. Were matrixZ instead equal to 0, then cone(Q) would become the relative dual tocone(U) (sharing the same affine hull;2.13.8, confer Figure 56a). In thatcase, projection Px = UU † x of x on R(U) becomes orthogonal projection(and unique minimum-distance).E.1.2Idempotence summaryNonorthogonal subspace-projector P is a (convex) linear operator defined byidempotence or biorthogonal decomposition (1889), but characterized not bysymmetry or positive semidefiniteness or nonexpansivity (1917).