12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

668 APPENDIX C. SOME ANALYTICAL OPTIMAL RESULTSThen we have a symmetric decomposition from unitary matrices as in (1745)whereU A √ δ(ψ(δ(Υ))) , Q A √ δ(ψ(δ(Υ))) H , Σ A = |Υ| (1754)U B √ δ(ψ(δ(Λ))) , Q B √ δ(ψ(δ(Λ))) H , Σ B = |Λ| (1755)Procrustes solution (1739) again sees the transposition relationshipS ⋆ = U A U H B = R ⋆T ∈ C n×n (1748)but both optimal unitary matrices are now themselves diagonal. So,S ⋆ ΛR ⋆ = δ(ψ(δ(Υ)))Λδ(ψ(δ(Λ))) = δ(ψ(δ(Υ)))|Λ| (1756)C.5 Nonconvex quadratics[346,2] [321,2] Given A∈ S n , b∈ R n , and ρ>01minimizex 2 xT Ax + b T xsubject to ‖x‖ ≤ ρ(1757)is a nonconvex problem for symmetric A unless A≽0. But necessaryand sufficient global optimality conditions are known for any symmetric A :vector x ⋆ solves (1757) iff ∃ Lagrange multiplier λ ⋆ ≥ 0 i) (A + λ ⋆ I)x ⋆ = −bii) λ ⋆ (‖x ⋆ ‖ − ρ) = 0 ,iii) A + λ ⋆ I ≽ 0‖x ⋆ ‖ ≤ ρλ ⋆ is unique. C.5 x ⋆ is unique if A+λ ⋆ I ≻0. Equality constrained problemi) (A + λ ⋆ I)x ⋆ = −bii) ‖x ⋆ ‖ = ρiii) A + λ ⋆ I ≽ 0⇔1minimizex 2 xT Ax + b T xsubject to ‖x‖ = ρ(1758)is nonconvex for any symmetric A matrix. x ⋆ solves (1758) iff ∃ λ ⋆ ∈ Rsatisfying the associated conditions. λ ⋆ and x ⋆ are unique as before. In 1998,Hiriart-Urruty [197] disclosed global optimality conditions for maximizing aconvexly constrained convex quadratic; a nonconvex problem [307,32].C.5 The first two are necessary KKT conditions [61,5.5.3] while condition iii governspassage to nonconvex global optimality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!