v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

convexoptimization.com
from convexoptimization.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

536 CHAPTER 6. CONE OF DISTANCE MATRICESHere is an algebraic method to prove nonnegativity: Suppose we aregiven A∈ S N⊥c and B = [B ij ]∈ S N + and A −B ∈ S N h . Then we have, forsome vector u , A = u1 T + 1u T = [A ij ] = [u i + u j ] and δ(B)= δ(A)= 2u .Positive semidefiniteness of B requires nonnegativity A −B ≥ 0 because(e i −e j ) T B(e i −e j ) = (B ii −B ij )−(B ji −B jj ) = 2(u i +u j )−2B ij ≥ 0 (1273)6.8.1.3 Dual Euclidean distance matrix criterionConditions necessary for membership of a matrix D ∗ ∈ S N to the dualEDM cone EDM N∗ may be derived from (1248): D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇒D ∗ = δ(y) − V N AVNT for some vector y and positive semidefinite matrixA∈ S N−1+ . This in turn implies δ(D ∗ 1)=δ(y). Then, for D ∗ ∈ S Nwhere, for any symmetric matrix D ∗D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇔ δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ≽ 0 (1274)δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ∈ S N c (1275)To show sufficiency of the matrix criterion in (1274), recall Gram-formEDM operatorD(G) = δ(G)1 T + 1δ(G) T − 2G (903)where Gram matrix G is positive semidefinite by definition, and recall theself-adjointness property of the main-diagonal linear operator δ (A.1):〈D , D ∗ 〉 = 〈 δ(G)1 T + 1δ(G) T − 2G , D ∗〉 = 〈G , δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ 〉 2 (921)Assuming 〈G , δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ 〉≥ 0 (1485), then we have known membershiprelation (2.13.2.0.1)D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇔ 〈D , D ∗ 〉 ≥ 0 ∀D ∈ EDM N (1276)

6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 537Elegance of this matrix criterion (1274) for membership to the dual EDMcone is lack of any other assumptions except D ∗ be symmetric: 6.12 LinearGram-form EDM operator D(Y ) (903) has adjoint, for Y ∈ S NThen from (1276) and (904) we have: [89, p.111]D T (Y ) (δ(Y 1) − Y ) 2 (1277)EDM N∗ = {D ∗ ∈ S N | 〈D , D ∗ 〉 ≥ 0 ∀D ∈ EDM N }= {D ∗ ∈ S N | 〈D(G), D ∗ 〉 ≥ 0 ∀G ∈ S N +}= {D ∗ ∈ S N | 〈 G, D T (D ∗ ) 〉 ≥ 0 ∀G ∈ S N +}= {D ∗ ∈ S N | δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ≽ 0}(1278)the dual EDM cone expressed in terms of the adjoint operator. A dual EDMcone determined this way is illustrated in Figure 151.6.8.1.3.1 Exercise. Dual EDM spectral cone.Find a spectral cone as in5.11.2 corresponding to EDM N∗ .6.8.1.4 Nonorthogonal components of dual EDMNow we tie construct (1269) for the dual EDM cone together with the matrixcriterion (1274) for dual EDM cone membership. For any D ∗ ∈ S N it isobvious:δ(D ∗ 1) ∈ S N⊥h (1279)any diagonal matrix belongs to the subspace of diagonal matrices (67). Weknow when D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ∈ S N c ∩ S N + (1280)this adjoint expression (1277) belongs to that face (1238) of the positivesemidefinite cone S N + in the geometric center subspace. Any nonzerodual EDMD ∗ = δ(D ∗ 1) − (δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ) ∈ S N⊥h ⊖ S N c ∩ S N + = EDM N∗ (1281)can therefore be expressed as the difference of two linearly independent (whenvectorized) nonorthogonal components (Figure 129, Figure 150).6.12 Recall: Schoenberg criterion (910) for membership to the EDM cone requiresmembership to the symmetric hollow subspace.

536 CHAPTER 6. CONE OF DISTANCE MATRICESHere is an algebraic method to prove nonnegativity: Suppose we aregiven A∈ S N⊥c and B = [B ij ]∈ S N + and A −B ∈ S N h . Then we have, forsome vector u , A = u1 T + 1u T = [A ij ] = [u i + u j ] and δ(B)= δ(A)= 2u .Positive semidefiniteness of B requires nonnegativity A −B ≥ 0 because(e i −e j ) T B(e i −e j ) = (B ii −B ij )−(B ji −B jj ) = 2(u i +u j )−2B ij ≥ 0 (1273)6.8.1.3 Dual Euclidean distance matrix criterionConditions necessary for membership of a matrix D ∗ ∈ S N to the dualEDM cone EDM N∗ may be derived from (1248): D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇒D ∗ = δ(y) − V N AVNT for some vector y and positive semidefinite matrixA∈ S N−1+ . This in turn implies δ(D ∗ 1)=δ(y). Then, for D ∗ ∈ S Nwhere, for any symmetric matrix D ∗D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇔ δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ≽ 0 (1274)δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ ∈ S N c (1275)To show sufficiency of the matrix criterion in (1274), recall Gram-formEDM operatorD(G) = δ(G)1 T + 1δ(G) T − 2G (903)where Gram matrix G is positive semidefinite by definition, and recall theself-adjointness property of the main-diagonal linear operator δ (A.1):〈D , D ∗ 〉 = 〈 δ(G)1 T + 1δ(G) T − 2G , D ∗〉 = 〈G , δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ 〉 2 (921)Assuming 〈G , δ(D ∗ 1) − D ∗ 〉≥ 0 (1485), then we have known membershiprelation (2.13.2.0.1)D ∗ ∈ EDM N∗ ⇔ 〈D , D ∗ 〉 ≥ 0 ∀D ∈ EDM N (1276)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!