12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1. CONVEX SET 49R nR mR(A T )x px p =A † bA † Ax = x pAx p = bR(A)b{x}0ηN(A)x=x p + ηAx = bAη = 0N(A T )0{b}Figure 16:(confer Figure 161) Action of linear map represented by A∈ R m×n :Component of vector x in nullspace N(A) maps to origin while componentin rowspace R(A T ) maps to range R(A). For any A∈ R m×n , AA † Ax = b(E) and inverse image of b ∈ R(A) is a nonempty affine set: x p + N(A).Inverse image of a convex set F ,f −1 (F) = {X | f(X)∈ F} ⊆ R p×k (32)a single- or many-valued mapping, under any affine function f isconvex.⋄In particular, any affine transformation of an affine set remains affine.[307, p.8] Ellipsoids are invariant to any [sic] affine transformation.Although not precluded, this inverse image theorem does not require auniquely invertible mapping f . Figure 16, for example, mechanizes inverseimage under a general linear map. Example 2.9.1.0.2 and Example 3.5.0.0.2offer further applications.Each converse of this two-part theorem is generally false; id est, givenf affine, a convex image f(C) does not imply that set C is convex, andneither does a convex inverse image f −1 (F) imply set F is convex. Acounterexample, invalidating a converse, is easy to visualize when the affinefunction is an orthogonal projector [331] [250]:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!