v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

convexoptimization.com
from convexoptimization.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

410 CHAPTER 5. EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE MATRIXFigure 118: Rendering of Fermat point in acrylic on canvas by Suman Vaze.Three circles intersect at Fermat point of minimum total distance from threevertices of (and interior to) red/black/white triangle.Barvinok’s Proposition 2.9.3.0.1 predicts existence for either formulation(920) or (922) such that implicit equality constraints induced by subspacemembership are ignored⌊√ ⌋8(N(N −1)/2) + 1 − 1rankG , rankV DV ≤= N − 1 (923)2because, in each case, the Gram matrix is confined to a face of positivesemidefinite cone S N + isomorphic with S N−1+ (6.6.1). (E.7.2.0.2) This boundis tight (5.7.1.1) and is the greatest upper bound. 5.85.4.2.3.2 Example. First duality.Kuhn reports that the first dual optimization problem 5.9 to be recorded inthe literature dates back to 1755. [Wıκımization] Perhaps more intriguing5.8 −V DV | N←1 = 0 (B.4.1)5.9 By dual problem is meant, in the strongest sense: the optimal objective achieved bya maximization problem, dual to a given minimization problem (related to each otherby a Lagrangian function), is always equal to the optimal objective achieved by theminimization. (Figure 58 Example 2.13.1.0.3) A dual problem is always convex.

5.4. EDM DEFINITION 411is the fact: this earliest instance of duality is a two-dimensional Euclideandistance geometry problem known as a Fermat point (Figure 118) namedafter the French mathematician. Given N distinct points in the plane{x i ∈ R 2 , i=1... N} , the Fermat point y is an optimal solution tominimizeyN∑‖y − x i ‖ (924)i=1a convex minimization of total distance. The historically first dual problemformulation asks for the smallest equilateral triangle encompassing (N = 3)three points x i . Another problem dual to (924) (Kuhn 1967)maximize{z i }subject toN∑〈z i , x i 〉i=1N∑z i = 0i=1‖z i ‖ ≤ 1∀i(925)has interpretation as minimization of work required to balance potentialenergy in an N-way tug-of-war between equally matched opponents situatedat {x i }. [374]It is not so straightforward to write the Fermat point problem (924)equivalently in terms of a Gram matrix from this section. Squaring insteadminimizeαN∑‖α−x i ‖ 2 ≡i=1minimizeD∈S N+1 〈−V , D〉subject to 〈D , e i e T j + e j e T i 〉 1 2 = ďij∀(i,j)∈ I−V DV ≽ 0 (926)yields an inequivalent convex geometric centering problem whoseequality constraints comprise EDM D main-diagonal zeros and knowndistances-square. 5.10 Going the other way, a problem dual to totaldistance-square maximization (Example 6.7.0.0.1) is a penultimate minimumeigenvalue problem having application to PageRank calculation by searchengines [231,4]. [340]Fermat function (924) is empirically compared with (926) in [61,8.7.3],but for multiple unknowns in R 2 , where propensity of (924) for producing5.10 α ⋆ is geometric center of points x i (973). For three points, I = {1,2,3} ; optimalaffine dimension (5.7) must be 2 because a third dimension can only increase totaldistance. Minimization of 〈−V,D〉 is a heuristic for rank minimization. (7.2.2)

5.4. EDM DEFINITION 411is the fact: this earliest instance of duality is a two-dimensional Euclideandistance geometry problem known as a Fermat point (Figure 118) namedafter the French mathematician. Given N distinct points in the plane{x i ∈ R 2 , i=1... N} , the Fermat point y is an optimal solution tominimizeyN∑‖y − x i ‖ (924)i=1a convex minimization of total distance. The historically first dual problemformulation asks for the smallest equilateral triangle encompassing (N = 3)three points x i . Another problem dual to (924) (Kuhn 1967)maximize{z i }subject toN∑〈z i , x i 〉i=1N∑z i = 0i=1‖z i ‖ ≤ 1∀i(925)has interpretation as minimization of work required to balance potentialenergy in an N-way tug-of-war between equally matched opponents situatedat {x i }. [374]It is not so straightforward to write the Fermat point problem (924)equivalently in terms of a Gram matrix from this section. Squaring insteadminimizeαN∑‖α−x i ‖ 2 ≡i=1minimizeD∈S N+1 〈−V , D〉subject to 〈D , e i e T j + e j e T i 〉 1 2 = ďij∀(i,j)∈ I−V DV ≽ 0 (926)yields an inequivalent convex geometric centering problem whoseequality constraints comprise EDM D main-diagonal zeros and knowndistances-square. 5.10 Going the other way, a problem dual to totaldistance-square maximization (Example 6.7.0.0.1) is a penultimate minimumeigenvalue problem having application to PageRank calculation by searchengines [231,4]. [340]Fermat function (924) is empirically compared with (926) in [61,8.7.3],but for multiple unknowns in R 2 , where propensity of (924) for producing5.10 α ⋆ is geometric center of points x i (973). For three points, I = {1,2,3} ; optimalaffine dimension (5.7) must be 2 because a third dimension can only increase totaldistance. Minimization of 〈−V,D〉 is a heuristic for rank minimization. (7.2.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!