12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.8. CONVEX ITERATION RANK-1 391which is a sum of rank-1 orthogonal projection matrices Q ii weighted byeigenvalues λ i where Q ij q i q T j ∈ R n×n , Q = [q 1 · · · q n ]∈ R n×n , Q T = Q −1 ,Λ ii = λ i ∈ R , and⎡Λ = ⎢⎣⎤λ 1 0λ 2 ⎥ ... ⎦ ∈ Sn (871)0 T λ nThe factΛ ≽ 0 ⇔ X ≽ 0 (1450)allows splitting semidefinite feasibility problem (869) into two parts:( ρ) minimizeΛ∥ A svec ∑λ i Q ii − b∥i=1[ Rρ] (872)+subject to δ(Λ) ∈0( ρ) minimizeQ∥ A svec ∑λ ⋆ i Q ii − b∥i=1(873)subject to Q T = Q −1The linear equality constraint A svec X = b has been moved to the objectivewithin a norm because these two problems (872) (873) are iterated; equalitymight only become attainable near convergence. This iteration alwaysconverges to a local minimum because the sequence of objective values ismonotonic and nonincreasing; any monotonically nonincreasing real sequenceconverges. [258,1.2] [42,1.1] A rank ρ matrix X solving the originalproblem (869) is found when the objective converges to 0 ; a certificate ofglobal optimality for the iteration. Positive semidefiniteness of matrix Xwith an upper bound ρ on rank is assured by the constraint on eigenvaluematrix Λ in convex problem (872); it means, the main diagonal of Λ mustbelong to the nonnegative orthant in a ρ-dimensional subspace of R n .The second problem (873) in the iteration is not convex. We propose

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!