12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248 CHAPTER 3. GEOMETRY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS3.5.2 semidefinite program via SchurSchur complement (1511) can be used to convert a projection problemto an optimization problem in epigraph form. Suppose, for example,we are presented with the constrained projection problem studied byHayden & Wells in [184] (who provide analytical solution): Given A∈ R M×Mand some full-rank matrix S ∈ R M×L with L < Mminimize ‖A − X‖ 2X∈ S MFsubject to S T XS ≽ 0(580)Variable X is constrained to be positive semidefinite, but only on a subspacedetermined by S . First we write the epigraph form:minimize tX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject to ‖A − X‖ 2 F ≤ tS T XS ≽ 0(581)Next we use Schur complement [277,6.4.3] [248] and matrix vectorization(2.2):minimize tX∈ S M , t∈R[]tI vec(A − X)subject tovec(A − X) T ≽ 0 (582)1S T XS ≽ 0This semidefinite program (4) is an epigraph form in disguise, equivalentto (580); it demonstrates how a quadratic objective or constraint can beconverted to a semidefinite constraint.Were problem (580) instead equivalently expressed without the squareminimize ‖A − X‖ FX∈ S Msubject to S T XS ≽ 0(583)then we get a subtle variation:minimize tX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject to ‖A − X‖ F ≤ tS T XS ≽ 0(584)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!