v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization
224 CHAPTER 3. GEOMETRY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS3.1.2.1.1 Exercise. Cone of convex functions.Prove that relation (498) implies: The set of all convex vector-valuedfunctions forms a convex cone in some space. Indeed, any nonnegativelyweighted sum of convex functions remains convex. So trivial function f = 0is convex. Relatively interior to each face of this cone are the strictly convexfunctions of corresponding dimension. 3.6 How do convex real functions fitinto this cone? Where are the affine functions?3.1.2.1.2 Example. Conic origins of Lagrangian.The cone of convex functions, implied by membership relation (498), providesfoundation for what is known as a Lagrangian function. [252, p.398] [280]Consider a conic optimization problem, for proper cone K and affine subset Aconvex w.r.t ⎣ RM +KAminimize f(x)xsubject to g(x) ≽ K 0h(x) ∈ A(504)A Cartesian product of convex functions remains convex, so we may write[ ] ⎡ ⎤[ ] ⎡ ⎤ ⎡fg fg w⎦ ⇔ [ w T λ T ν T ] convex ∀⎣λ ⎦∈h h ν⎤⎣ RM∗ +K ∗ ⎦A ⊥(505)where A ⊥ is a normal cone to A . A normal cone to an affine subset is theorthogonal complement of its parallel subspace (E.10.3.2.1).Membership relation (505) holds because of equality for h in convexitycriterion (497) and because normal-cone membership relation (451), givenpoint a∈A , becomesh ∈ A ⇔ 〈ν , h − a〉=0 for all ν ∈ A ⊥ (506)In other words: all affine functions are convex (with respect to any givenproper cone), all convex functions are translation invariant, whereas anyaffine function must satisfy (506).A real Lagrangian arises from the scalar term in (505); id est,[ ] fghL [w T λ T ν T ]= w T f + λ T g + ν T h (507)3.6 Strict case excludes cone’s point at origin and zero weighting.
3.2. PRACTICAL NORM FUNCTIONS, ABSOLUTE VALUE 2253.2 Practical norm functions, absolute valueTo some mathematicians, “all norms on R n are equivalent” [159, p.53];meaning, ratios of different norms are bounded above and below by finitepredeterminable constants. But to statisticians and engineers, all norms arecertainly not created equal; as evidenced by the compressed sensing (sparsity)revolution, begun in 2004, whose focus is predominantly 1-norm.A norm on R n is a convex function f : R n → R satisfying: for x,y ∈ R n ,α∈ R [227, p.59] [159, p.52]1. f(x) ≥ 0 (f(x) = 0 ⇔ x = 0) (nonnegativity)2. f(x + y) ≤ f(x) + f(y) 3.7 (triangle inequality)3. f(αx) = |α|f(x) (nonnegative homogeneity)Convexity follows by properties 2 and 3. Most useful are 1-, 2-, and ∞-norm:‖x‖ 1 = minimize 1 T tt∈R nsubject to −t ≼ x ≼ t(508)where |x| = t ⋆ (entrywise absolute value equals optimal t ). 3.8‖x‖ 2 = minimizet∈Rsubject tot[ tI xx T t]≽S n+1+0(509)where ‖x‖ 2 = ‖x‖ √ x T x = t ⋆ .‖x‖ ∞ = minimize tt∈Rsubject to −t1 ≼ x ≼ t1(510)where max{|x i | , i=1... n} = t ⋆ .‖x‖ 1 = minimizeα∈R n , β∈R n 1 T (α + β)subject to α,β ≽ 0x = α − β(511)3.7 ‖x + y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ for any norm, with equality iff x = κy where κ ≥ 0.3.8 Vector 1 may be replaced with any positive [sic] vector to get absolute value,theoretically, although 1 provides the 1-norm.
- Page 173 and 174: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 175 and 176: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 177 and 178: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 179 and 180: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 181 and 182: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 183 and 184: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 185 and 186: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 187 and 188: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 189 and 190: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 191 and 192: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 193 and 194: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 195 and 196: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 197 and 198: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 199 and 200: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 201 and 202: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 203 and 204: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 205 and 206: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 207 and 208: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 209 and 210: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 211 and 212: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 213 and 214: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 215 and 216: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 217 and 218: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 219 and 220: Chapter 3Geometry of convex functio
- Page 221 and 222: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 221f 1 (x)f 2
- Page 223: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 223Rf(b)f(X
- Page 227 and 228: 3.2. PRACTICAL NORM FUNCTIONS, ABSO
- Page 229 and 230: 3.2. PRACTICAL NORM FUNCTIONS, ABSO
- Page 231 and 232: 3.2. PRACTICAL NORM FUNCTIONS, ABSO
- Page 233 and 234: 3.2. PRACTICAL NORM FUNCTIONS, ABSO
- Page 235 and 236: 3.3. INVERTED FUNCTIONS AND ROOTS 2
- Page 237 and 238: 3.4. AFFINE FUNCTION 237rather]x >
- Page 239 and 240: 3.4. AFFINE FUNCTION 239f(z)Az 2z 1
- Page 241 and 242: 3.5. EPIGRAPH, SUBLEVEL SET 241{a T
- Page 243 and 244: 3.5. EPIGRAPH, SUBLEVEL SET 243Subl
- Page 245 and 246: 3.5. EPIGRAPH, SUBLEVEL SET 245wher
- Page 247 and 248: 3.5. EPIGRAPH, SUBLEVEL SET 247part
- Page 249 and 250: 3.5. EPIGRAPH, SUBLEVEL SET 249that
- Page 251 and 252: 3.6. GRADIENT 251respect to its vec
- Page 253 and 254: 3.6. GRADIENT 253Invertibility is g
- Page 255 and 256: 3.6. GRADIENT 2553.6.1.0.2 Theorem.
- Page 257 and 258: 3.6. GRADIENT 257f(Y )[ ∇f(X)−1
- Page 259 and 260: 3.6. GRADIENT 259αβα ≥ β ≥
- Page 261 and 262: 3.6. GRADIENT 2613.6.4 second-order
- Page 263 and 264: 3.7. CONVEX MATRIX-VALUED FUNCTION
- Page 265 and 266: 3.7. CONVEX MATRIX-VALUED FUNCTION
- Page 267 and 268: 3.7. CONVEX MATRIX-VALUED FUNCTION
- Page 269 and 270: 3.8. QUASICONVEX 269exponential alw
- Page 271 and 272: 3.9. SALIENT PROPERTIES 2713.8.0.0.
- Page 273 and 274: Chapter 4Semidefinite programmingPr
224 CHAPTER 3. GEOMETRY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS3.1.2.1.1 Exercise. Cone of convex functions.Prove that relation (498) implies: The set of all convex vector-valuedfunctions forms a convex cone in some space. Indeed, any nonnegativelyweighted sum of convex functions remains convex. So trivial function f = 0is convex. Relatively interior to each face of this cone are the strictly convexfunctions of corresponding dimension. 3.6 How do convex real functions fitinto this cone? Where are the affine functions?3.1.2.1.2 Example. Conic origins of Lagrangian.The cone of convex functions, implied by membership relation (498), providesfoundation for what is known as a Lagrangian function. [252, p.398] [280]Consider a conic optimization problem, for proper cone K and affine subset Aconvex w.r.t ⎣ RM +KAminimize f(x)xsubject to g(x) ≽ K 0h(x) ∈ A(504)A Cartesian product of convex functions remains convex, so we may write[ ] ⎡ ⎤[ ] ⎡ ⎤ ⎡fg fg w⎦ ⇔ [ w T λ T ν T ] convex ∀⎣λ ⎦∈h h ν⎤⎣ RM∗ +K ∗ ⎦A ⊥(505)where A ⊥ is a normal cone to A . A normal cone to an affine subset is theorthogonal complement of its parallel subspace (E.10.3.2.1).Membership relation (505) holds because of equality for h in convexitycriterion (497) and because normal-cone membership relation (451), givenpoint a∈A , becomesh ∈ A ⇔ 〈ν , h − a〉=0 for all ν ∈ A ⊥ (506)In other words: all affine functions are convex (with respect to any givenproper cone), all convex functions are translation invariant, whereas anyaffine function must satisfy (506).A real Lagrangian arises from the scalar term in (505); id est,[ ] fghL [w T λ T ν T ]= w T f + λ T g + ν T h (507)3.6 Strict case excludes cone’s point at origin and zero weighting.