12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQUALITY 1952.13.9.2 Simplicial caseWhen a convex cone is simplicial (2.12.3), Cone Table 1 simplifies becausethen aff coneX = R n : For square X and assuming simplicial K such thatrank(X ∈ R n×N ) = N dim aff K = n (419)we haveCone Table S K K ∗vertex-description X X †Thalfspace-description X † X TFor example, vertex-description (418) simplifies toK ∗ = {X †T b | b ≽ 0} ⊂ R n (420)Now, because dim R(X)= dim R(X †T ) , (E) the dual cone K ∗ is simplicialwhenever K is.2.13.9.3 Cone membership relations in a subspaceIt is obvious by definition (297) of ordinary dual cone K ∗ , in ambient vectorspace R , that its determination instead in subspace S ⊆ R is identicalto its intersection with S ; id est, assuming closed convex cone K ⊆ S andK ∗ ⊆ R(K ∗ were ambient S) ≡ (K ∗ in ambient R) ∩ S (421)because{y ∈ S | 〈y , x〉 ≥ 0 for all x ∈ K} = {y ∈ R | 〈y , x〉 ≥ 0 for all x ∈ K} ∩ S(422)From this, a constrained membership relation for the ordinary dual coneK ∗ ⊆ R , assuming x,y ∈ S and closed convex cone K ⊆ Sy ∈ K ∗ ∩ S ⇔ 〈y , x〉 ≥ 0 for all x ∈ K (423)By closure in subspace S we have conjugation (2.13.1.1):x ∈ K ⇔ 〈y , x〉 ≥ 0 for all y ∈ K ∗ ∩ S (424)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!