12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY2.13.8.1 x ∈ KSuppose x belongs to K ⊆ R n . Then x =Xa for some a≽0. Vector a isunique only when {Γ i } is a linearly independent set. 2.74 Vector a∈ R N cantake the form a =Bx if R(B)= R N . Then we require Xa =XBx = x andBx=BXa = a . The pseudoinverse B =X † ∈ R N×n (E) is suitable when Xis skinny-or-square and full-rank. In that case rankX =N , and for all c ≽ 0and i=1... Na ≽ 0 ⇔ X † Xa ≽ 0 ⇔ a T X T X †T c ≥ 0 ⇔ Γ T i X †T c ≥ 0 (405)The penultimate inequality follows from the generalized inequality andmembership corollary, while the last inequality is a consequence of thatcorollary’s discretization (2.13.4.2.1). 2.75 From (405) and (393) we deduceK ∗ ∩ aff K = cone(X †T ) = {X †T c | c ≽ 0} ⊆ R n (406)is the vertex-description for that section of K ∗ in the affine hull of K becauseR(X †T ) = R(X) by definition of the pseudoinverse. From (310), we knowK ∗ ∩ aff K must be pointed if rel int K is logically assumed nonempty withrespect to aff K .Conversely, suppose full-rank skinny-or-square matrix (N ≤ n)[ ]X †T Γ ∗ 1 Γ ∗ 2 · · · Γ ∗ N ∈ R n×N (407)comprises the extreme directions {Γ ∗ i } ⊂ aff K of the dual-cone intersectionwith the affine hull of K . 2.76 From the discretized membership theorem and2.74 Conic independence alone (2.10) is insufficient to guarantee uniqueness.2.75a ≽ 0 ⇔ a T X T X †T c ≥ 0 ∀(c ≽ 0 ⇔ a T X T X †T c ≥ 0 ∀a ≽ 0)∀(c ≽ 0 ⇔ Γ T i X†T c ≥ 0 ∀i) Intuitively, any nonnegative vector a is a conic combination of the standard basis{e i ∈ R N }; a≽0 ⇔ a i e i ≽0 for all i. The last inequality in (405) is a consequence of thefact that x=Xa may be any extreme direction of K , in which case a is a standard basisvector; a = e i ≽0. Theoretically, because c ≽ 0 defines a pointed polyhedral cone (in fact,the nonnegative orthant in R N ), we can take (405) one step further by discretizing c :a ≽ 0 ⇔ Γ T i Γ ∗ j ≥ 0 for i,j =1... N ⇔ X † X ≥ 0In words, X † X must be a matrix whose entries are each nonnegative.2.76 When closed convex cone K is not full-dimensional, K ∗ has no extreme directions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!