brennan center for justice
brennan center for justice brennan center for justice
office.“But the readers in several municipalities, includingBayonne, Union City, Secaucus, and West New Yorkaren't working, Netchert said about 9 p.m.”June 2008February2008SequoiaAVC AdvantageSequoiaAVC AdvantageNew JerseyNew JerseyResults were therefore delayed by a few hours. It wasunclear what caused the problems. 422Monmouth County, NJThe Asbury Park Press reported that “a computerbeing used by the municipal clerk malfunctioned.”Local election officials could not fix the error, so thecartridges were physically taken to the centraltabulation office. Results were therefore delayed by afew hours. It was unclear what caused the“malfunction.” 423Eight New Jersey CountiesThe Star-Ledger reported,, “[t]he numbers from thecartridges that print out vote tallies and the papertapebackup within the machine didn't match” whenofficials in Union County, New Jersey attempted toobtain vote totals after the 2008 presidential primary.According to the paper, several other counties,including Bergen, Gloucester, Middlesex and Ocean,uncovered similar problems when Union Countyofficials encouraged them to double-check theirresults. 424According to a report produced by a team ofPrinceton researchers who conducted an independentanalysis of the voting equipment used in the primary,the malfunction, which caused some voters to receivethe wrong party’s ballot, was triggered by humanerror that would be “easy and natural” for manypollworkers to make. 425February2008SequoiaAVC AdvantageNew JerseyFor more on this incident, see case study 13 on pages 22- 24 of this report.Essex County, NJThe Montclair Times reported that “[i]n EssexCounty, Superintendent of Elections CarmineCasciano said that 12 out of about 650 SequoiaAdvantage electronic voting machines were replacedon Tuesday. Of that amount, four machines werereplaced due to Board of Election workers mistakenly76 | Brennan Center for Justice
February2008November2006SequoiaAVC AdvantageSequoia:AVC AdvantageNew JerseyNew Jerseyturning off the machines and thereby deactivatingthem.” The other eight had to be replaced due to a“software malfunction”⎯Casciano said ““[b]ychecking further into it, we have found no evidencethat we think triggered it. So we’re blaming it on thesystem. A software malfunction.’” 426Hudson County, NJThe Star-Ledger reported that some election workersfailed to take cartridges from individual ballotingmachines before election officials officially sealed themachines. The election results were thereforedelayed. 427Passaic, Paterson, Scotch Plains, and NorthBergen Counties, NJFebruary2008June 2008AvanteVote-TrakkerES&SModel 100New JerseyNew MexicoWABC-TV New Jersey reported that the USAttorney for New Jersey dispatched investigators toaddress complaints of voting machines that werepreventing voters from casting ballots for theRepublican Senate candidate. Some reported thattheir ballot was pre-voted in favor of the Democraticincumbent, while others said the machine would notregister their selections. 428Warren County, NJAccording to the Express-Times, various electronicvoting machines stopped working in Warren County,apparently because of an election official errorregarding the programming of the machine. 900voters were forced to use emergency ballots. 429Curry County, NMAccording to the Clovis News Journal, “countyofficials reported to the [Curry County Canvass]board that memory cards — used to transfer talliesfrom the ballot machines to a computer —experienced corruption issues that rendered themunusable.March 2008ES&SModel 100New Mexico“However, staff were able to bypass the problembecause those same voting machines generated papertape printouts, which they were able to manuallycount and tally.” 430Various Counties, NMVarious counties in New Mexico, the Associated Pressreported, experienced problems with the memoryBrennan Center for Justice | 77
- Page 32 and 33: elative to voting system vendors. A
- Page 34 and 35: or potential vulnerabilities by any
- Page 36 and 37: Finally, the Department of Justice
- Page 38 and 39: Provide Timely & Organized Access t
- Page 40 and 41: the CPSC may compel the manufacture
- Page 42 and 43: Civil Division of the Department of
- Page 44 and 45: C. Analogous RegimesCivil penalty p
- Page 46 and 47: Of course, adding these kinds of pr
- Page 49 and 50: v. conclusionVoting is the most imp
- Page 51 and 52: System Vulnerabilities: should incl
- Page 53 and 54: February2008September2004November20
- Page 55 and 56: November2006November2006ES&SiVotron
- Page 57 and 58: June 2008SequoiaOptech 400CCaliforn
- Page 59 and 60: March 2004March 2004DieboldAccuVote
- Page 61 and 62: February2008September2008PremierAcc
- Page 63 and 64: event of an overvote displayed a co
- Page 67 and 68: January 2008January 2008PremierAccu
- Page 69 and 70: November2004ES&SM650FloridaSupervis
- Page 71 and 72: October 2008February2008PremierAccu
- Page 73 and 74: February2008February2008October 200
- Page 75 and 76: 2004 AccuVote 2000ESNovember2008Nov
- Page 77 and 78: November2008November2008Hart InterC
- Page 79 and 80: February2008May 2006August 2004May2
- Page 81: March 2008June 2009November2008Prem
- Page 85 and 86: November2008SequoiaImageCastNew Yor
- Page 87 and 88: November2004November2004UnilectPatr
- Page 89 and 90: November2008November2008March 2008E
- Page 91 and 92: May 2008April 2008November2006May 2
- Page 93 and 94: 2006 iVotronicThe Post & Courier re
- Page 95 and 96: AccuVote TSR6; HartInterCiviceScan;
- Page 97 and 98: November2006ES&S:iVotronicTexasHida
- Page 99 and 100: November2003November2009November200
- Page 101 and 102: October 2008October 2008May 2008ES&
- Page 103 and 104: appendix c : dupage county election
- Page 105 and 106: and resolve problems with certified
- Page 107 and 108: 49. E-mail from Carolyn Crnich, Cle
- Page 109 and 110: 95. Kleinberg, supra note 92.96. Ma
- Page 111 and 112: 143. Telephone Interview with Rokey
- Page 113 and 114: 187. Id. at 22.188. See Thomas, sup
- Page 115 and 116: 1801 (“[T]he Secretary shall init
- Page 117 and 118: 258. See United States Department o
- Page 119 and 120: 294. John Archibald & Brett J. Blac
- Page 121 and 122: 334. Jane Musgrave, Palm Beach Coun
- Page 123 and 124: 374. Glitch Keeps Fulton Voters Wai
- Page 125 and 126: 417. Joe Dejka & Chris Olson, A Lat
- Page 127 and 128: 457. Letter from Dave Byrd, Preside
- Page 129: 498. Lauren Glendenning, Voting Gli
office.“But the readers in several municipalities, includingBayonne, Union City, Secaucus, and West New Yorkaren't working, Netchert said about 9 p.m.”June 2008February2008SequoiaAVC AdvantageSequoiaAVC AdvantageNew JerseyNew JerseyResults were there<strong>for</strong>e delayed by a few hours. It wasunclear what caused the problems. 422Monmouth County, NJThe Asbury Park Press reported that “a computerbeing used by the municipal clerk malfunctioned.”Local election officials could not fix the error, so thecartridges were physically taken to the centraltabulation office. Results were there<strong>for</strong>e delayed by afew hours. It was unclear what caused the“malfunction.” 423Eight New Jersey CountiesThe Star-Ledger reported,, “[t]he numbers from thecartridges that print out vote tallies and the papertapebackup within the machine didn't match” whenofficials in Union County, New Jersey attempted toobtain vote totals after the 2008 presidential primary.According to the paper, several other counties,including Bergen, Gloucester, Middlesex and Ocean,uncovered similar problems when Union Countyofficials encouraged them to double-check theirresults. 424According to a report produced by a team ofPrinceton researchers who conducted an independentanalysis of the voting equipment used in the primary,the malfunction, which caused some voters to receivethe wrong party’s ballot, was triggered by humanerror that would be “easy and natural” <strong>for</strong> manypollworkers to make. 425February2008SequoiaAVC AdvantageNew JerseyFor more on this incident, see case study 13 on pages 22- 24 of this report.Essex County, NJThe Montclair Times reported that “[i]n EssexCounty, Superintendent of Elections CarmineCasciano said that 12 out of about 650 SequoiaAdvantage electronic voting machines were replacedon Tuesday. Of that amount, four machines werereplaced due to Board of Election workers mistakenly76 | Brennan Center <strong>for</strong> Justice