brennan center for justice

brennan center for justice brennan center for justice

brennancenter.org
from brennancenter.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

November2004November2004November2002November2002ES&SM550ES&SM650ES&SM100Sequoia:EdgeNebraskaNebraskaNebraskaNevadaAccording to the Billings Gazette, a programmingerror caused voting machines to inaccurately recordall votes. An election official explained that hesuspected the problem had occurred because heforgot to hit the “zero out” button required betweenentering absentee and regular ballots on the machine.Consequently, as many as 3,000 absentee ballots mayhave been counted a second time when the regularballots were being run through the machines.Officials decided to conduct a full recount to ensurethat the election outcome was accurate. 414Lancaster County, NEThe Lincoln Star Journal reported that a number ofmalfunctions occurred on optical scan machines inuse during the general election. According to thepaper, some machines shut down completely. Whenthe problems began, election officials stopped to testthe six machines, revealing that two were notproducing correct vote tallies. Those two machineswere shut down, but later in the day, the remainingmachines began to have similar mechanicalproblems. 415Sarpy County, NELocal TV news station WOWT 6 reported that afterballots were counted in a race for city council,election officials realized that there were more votesthan voters. According to the officials, the erroraffected 32 of 80 precincts and as many as 10,000votes. It was believed that the glitch affected thecandidates equally and did not alter the outcome ofthe elections. The evidence and explanation for themiscount were inconclusive at the time. 416Sarpy County, NEAccording to the Omaha World-Herald, the opticalscan machines failed to tally “yes” votes on theGretna school-bond issue, giving the false impressionthat the measure was defeated. The measure hadactually passed by a 2-1 margin. 417Clark County, NVAccording to the Albuquerque Tribune, the softwareused to aggregate the vote totals on a Sequoia votingsystem was overwhelmed by the volume of ballotscast and omitted some votes from total reports.74 | Brennan Center for Justice

March 2008June 2009November2008PremierAccuVote-OSSequoiaAVC AdvantageSequoiaAVC AdvantageNewHampshireNew JerseyNew JerseyAlthough a technician for the vendor fixed theproblem in Clark County and provided officials therewith a software patch, the same problem occurred afew weeks later in Bernalillo County, New Mexico. 418Rockingham County, NHThe Eagle Tribune reported that “a single key on afaulty computer keyboard” caused the election resultsfrom optical scanners to be mis-entered by electionofficials. Consequently, the initial election result waserroneous. 419Monmouth County, NJAccording to the Asbury Park Press, “results from ahalf-dozen towns were delayed because of problemsin transmitting data from machine cartridges, CountyClerk M. Claire French said on Wednesday.” Thecartridges thus had to be physically taken to thecentral election offices. "We're studying what causedthese problems," French said. 420Essex County, NJThe Star-Ledger reported that “[v]oters arriving atConklin Hall near the Rutgers-Newark campus werethwarted this morning by two malfunctioning votingmachines. Voters said they were told the machinewould have to be replaced and to come back later.“Carmen Cassiano, Essex County's commissioner ofregistration, said about half of the machinesmalfunctioned because they were turned onincorrectly, which caused them to jam.November2008SequoiaAVC AdvantageNew Jersey“They could not be reset, and had to be replaced,Cassiano said. All the jammed machines werereplaced by mid-morning, but there were sporadicproblems throughout the day.” 421Hudson County, NJAccording to the Jersey Journal, “the system ofcounting votes at Hudson County Clerk’s office hasgone haywire.”“According to County Clerk Barbara Netchert, theway things were supposed to work is that local townclerks were supposed to be able put the cartridgesfrom the electronic voting machines into a reader andthe information would be sent via computer to herBrennan Center for Justice | 75

November2004November2004November2002November2002ES&SM550ES&SM650ES&SM100Sequoia:EdgeNebraskaNebraskaNebraskaNevadaAccording to the Billings Gazette, a programmingerror caused voting machines to inaccurately recordall votes. An election official explained that hesuspected the problem had occurred because he<strong>for</strong>got to hit the “zero out” button required betweenentering absentee and regular ballots on the machine.Consequently, as many as 3,000 absentee ballots mayhave been counted a second time when the regularballots were being run through the machines.Officials decided to conduct a full recount to ensurethat the election outcome was accurate. 414Lancaster County, NEThe Lincoln Star Journal reported that a number ofmalfunctions occurred on optical scan machines inuse during the general election. According to thepaper, some machines shut down completely. Whenthe problems began, election officials stopped to testthe six machines, revealing that two were notproducing correct vote tallies. Those two machineswere shut down, but later in the day, the remainingmachines began to have similar mechanicalproblems. 415Sarpy County, NELocal TV news station WOWT 6 reported that afterballots were counted in a race <strong>for</strong> city council,election officials realized that there were more votesthan voters. According to the officials, the erroraffected 32 of 80 precincts and as many as 10,000votes. It was believed that the glitch affected thecandidates equally and did not alter the outcome ofthe elections. The evidence and explanation <strong>for</strong> themiscount were inconclusive at the time. 416Sarpy County, NEAccording to the Omaha World-Herald, the opticalscan machines failed to tally “yes” votes on theGretna school-bond issue, giving the false impressionthat the measure was defeated. The measure hadactually passed by a 2-1 margin. 417Clark County, NVAccording to the Albuquerque Tribune, the softwareused to aggregate the vote totals on a Sequoia votingsystem was overwhelmed by the volume of ballotscast and omitted some votes from total reports.74 | Brennan Center <strong>for</strong> Justice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!