brennan center for justice

202. For voters who may not know the specific make and model of the machine involved, a simple description of thetype of machine will suffice as the EAC will be able to determine a machine’s make and model from the other datasubmitted by the voter in the report.203. New legislation should also authorize the relevant agency to seek penalties against voting machine vendors who takeany retaliatory action against election officials who post to the site.204. This type of screening occurs with similar reporting databases. For example, some states screen reports for inclusionin their highway accident databases. See, e.g., Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities,2001 Alaska Traffic Accidents (May 2003), available at http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/highwaydata/pub/accidents/2001aktraffix.pdf.205. See GAO Voting Systems Report, supra note 15 at 31; Email from Jeannie Layson, Director of Communications andCongressional Affairs, U.S. Election Assistance Commission to Susan Greenhalgh, Spokeswoman, Voter Action,Sept. 22, 2008 (on file with the Brennan Center).206. GAO Voting Systems Report, supra note 15 at 4-5.207. Id. at 32-33.208. E-mail from Jeannie Layson, Director of Communications and Congressional Affairs, U.S. Election AssistanceCommission, to Lawrence Norden, Senior Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice (Sept. 10, 2010, 15:01 EST) (on filewith the Brennan Center).209. See generally Institute of Internal Auditors, The Government Accountability Office: Government AuditStandards and Institute of Internal Auditors: International professional Practices Framework: AComparison; Frederick M. Kaiser, GAO: Government Accountability Office and General AccountingOffice, CRS Report for Congress (Sept. 10, 2008) .210. See, e.g., Government Accountability Office, Election Reform: Nine States’ Experiences ImplementingFederal Requirements for Computerized Statewide Voter Registration Lists (Feb. 7, 2006); GovernmentAccountability Office, Elections: Results of GAO’s Testing of Voting Systems Used in Sarasota Countyin Florida’s 13th Congressional District (Feb. 8, 2008); Government Accountability Office, Elections:States, Territories, and the District Are Taking a Range of Important Steps to Manage Their VariedVoting System Environments (Sept. 2008).211. The GAO has asked Congress to consider expanding the EAC’s role under HAVA to address this problem. GAOVoting Systems Report, supra note 15 at 34.212. Pub L. 104-152, 49 U.S.C. §§ 30501-30505 (2010).213. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 110-314, 122 Stat. 3016 (2008) (codified in scattered sectionsof 15 U.S.C.).214. See § 212, 122 Stat. at 3048–49 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 2055a(a), (b)). There is currently a March 2011 deadlinefor implementation of the database, which is tentatively named Saferproducts.org. See, e.g., Consumer Product SafetyCommission Oversight: Current Issues and a Vision for the Future: Hearing before the House Energy and CommerceSubcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection, 111th Congress (2009) (statement of Inez Tenenbaum,Chairman, Consumer Product Safety Commission).215. H.R. Rep. No. 110–501, at 43–44 (2007).216. Congress created NHTSA in 1970. See Highway Safety Act, Pub. L. No. 91 –605 § 201, 84 Stat. 1739 (1970).217. See Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act, Pub. L. No. 106–414,114 Stat. 1800 (2000) (codified in scattered sections of 49 U.S.C.). Congress mandated that NHTSA conductrulemaking to determine the manner and extent of the early warning data and its collection. § 3(b), 114 Stat. at108 | Brennan Center for Justice