12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 8 Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 8 Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 8 Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 8 <strong>Vector</strong> <strong>Spaces</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Mechanics</strong> 89a probability P(q n |ψ) of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the system <strong>in</strong> the state |q n 〉 given it was <strong>in</strong> the state |ψ〉.Likewise, there will be a probability P(φ|q n ) of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the system <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al state |φ〉given that it was <strong>in</strong> the state |q n 〉. It is at this po<strong>in</strong>t that we reach the result that, <strong>in</strong> a sense,def<strong>in</strong>es quantum mechanics. If the possibility exists of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the system <strong>in</strong> any of thestates |q 1 〉, |q 2 〉, . . . , then accord<strong>in</strong>g to classical ideas of probability, we would be safe <strong>in</strong>assum<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tuitive formula∑P(φ|ψ) = P(φ|q n )P(q n |ψ) — a result of classical probability theoryni.e. the system starts <strong>in</strong> the state |ψ〉, and has the probability P(q n |ψ) that it will end up<strong>in</strong> the state |q n 〉, and once it ‘arrives there’ we then have the probability P(φ|q n ) that itwill then end up <strong>in</strong> the state |φ〉 given that it was <strong>in</strong> the state |q n 〉. Multiply<strong>in</strong>g thesetwo probabilities will then give the probability of the system start<strong>in</strong>g from |ψ〉 and pass<strong>in</strong>gthrough |q n 〉 on its way to the f<strong>in</strong>al state |φ〉. We then sum over all the possible <strong>in</strong>termediatestates |q n 〉 to give the total probability of arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the state |φ〉. However, what is foundexperimentally is that if the system is never observed <strong>in</strong> any of the <strong>in</strong>termediate states |q n 〉,this probability is not given by this classical result – the measurements show evidence of<strong>in</strong>terference effects, which can only be understood if this probability is given as the squareof a ‘probability amplitude’.Thus, we f<strong>in</strong>d we must write P(φ|ψ) = |〈φ|ψ〉| 2 , where 〈φ|ψ〉 is a complex number, generallyreferred to as the probability amplitude of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the system <strong>in</strong> state |φ〉 given that itwas <strong>in</strong> state |ψ〉, and this probability amplitude is then given by∑〈φ|ψ〉 = 〈φ|q n 〉〈q n |ψ〉 (8.51)nwhere the sum is over the probability amplitudes of the system pass<strong>in</strong>g through all thepossible states associated with all the possible observed values of the quantity Q.If we square this result we f<strong>in</strong>d that∑P(φ|ψ) = |〈φ|ψ〉| 2 = |〈φ|q n 〉| 2 |〈q n |ψ〉| 2 + cross termsn∑= P(φ|q n )P(q n |ψ) + cross terms. (8.52)nWe note that this expression consists, <strong>in</strong> part, of the classical result Eqn. (8.3), but there is,<strong>in</strong> addition, cross terms. It is these terms that are responsible for the <strong>in</strong>terference effectsobserved <strong>in</strong> the two slit experiment, or <strong>in</strong> the Stern-Gerlach experiment. If we observewhich state |q n 〉 the system ‘passes through’ it is always found that these <strong>in</strong>terferenceterms are washed out, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the result to the classical result Eqn. (8.3). This we haveseen <strong>in</strong> the case of two slit <strong>in</strong>terference where<strong>in</strong> if the slit through which the particlepasses is observed, then the <strong>in</strong>terference pattern on the observation screen is washed out.What rema<strong>in</strong>s to be found is ways to calculate these ‘probability amplitudes’. We can goa long way towards do<strong>in</strong>g this by recogniz<strong>in</strong>g, from a purely physical perspective, that theprobability amplitudes 〈q m |q n 〉 must have the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties:• 〈q m |q n 〉 = 0 if m n. This amounts to stat<strong>in</strong>g that if the system is <strong>in</strong> the state|q n 〉, i.e. where<strong>in</strong> the observable Q is known to have the value q n , then there is zeropossibility of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the state |q m 〉.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!