MS Thesis R. Hager - Hawaii National Marine Renewable Energy ...
MS Thesis R. Hager - Hawaii National Marine Renewable Energy ... MS Thesis R. Hager - Hawaii National Marine Renewable Energy ...
Table 4. 3 Numerical ResultsBodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.6BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.61 50.20% 53.04% 86.30% 8 50.20% 53.16% 85.23%2 50.20% 53.05% 86.13% 9 50.21% 53.23% 85.18%3 50.22% 53.14% 86.10% 10 50.23% 53.27% 84.92%4 50.19% 53.08% 85.93% 11 50.23% 53.25% 84.62%5 50.18% 53.04% 85.63% 12 50.23% 53.24% 84.30%6 50.20% 53.16% 85.67% 13 50.21% 53.18% 84.01%7 50.20% 53.16% 85.46% 14 50.21% 53.16% 83.61%80
BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.6BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.615 50.22% 53.19% 83.28% 22 50.06% 52.42% 79.01%16 50.21% 53.14% 82.82% 23 50.01% 52.24% 78.25%17 50.21% 53.09% 82.16% 24 50.02% 52.22% 77.75%18 50.20% 53.01% 81.53% 25 49.98% 52.06% 77.10%19 50.18% 52.94% 81.21% 26 49.94% 51.91% 76.49%20 50.13% 52.75% 80.60% 27 49.91% 51.78% 75.91%21 50.10% 52.58% 79.61% 28 49.89% 51.67% 75.38%81
- Page 29 and 30: Linear GeneratorTurbineRotary Gener
- Page 31 and 32: Table 2. 1 WEC ClassificationsDevic
- Page 33 and 34: 33P.T.O.MooringReferencePointOperat
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 3. THEORY AND GOVERNING EQU
- Page 37 and 38: F(x,z,t) z 0DFDtFt u F 0 0 (4
- Page 39 and 40: in ni(13)on S for i=1, 3in( r n)i3
- Page 41 and 42: I iAg e ekz i( kx t)(30)cosh( k(z
- Page 44 and 45: where ijkis the permutation symbol.
- Page 46 and 47: Mw k ieitS( D I) ijkrinjdS(46)3.3.3
- Page 48 and 49: Due to Kirchhoff decomposition, rec
- Page 50 and 51: TE KE PE 20L Asin(kx) 1 2(61)dV d
- Page 52 and 53: P I Iw dS (70)tnSIf the column
- Page 54 and 55: 221 2P gA C(77)max g2 3.8 Maximum
- Page 56 and 57: 4.2 AQWA Modeling ProcedureThe user
- Page 58 and 59: : Local data has changed, and the c
- Page 60 and 61: Figure 4. 5 Drawing in Design Modul
- Page 62 and 63: 12. Delete all lines inside the cur
- Page 64 and 65: 22. Edit the details of the slice u
- Page 66 and 67: Figure 4. 15 Details of the Part7.
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 4. 17 Details of the Mesh4.2
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4. 21 Detials of the Wave Di
- Page 72 and 73: 5. Highlight Diffraction + Froude-K
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4.1 Body Dimensions for Numer
- Page 76 and 77: concavity from concave down to conc
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4. 29 Maximum Power Absorpti
- Page 82 and 83: BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ a
- Page 84 and 85: WAVEFigure 5. 1 Body Faces Wave Mak
- Page 86 and 87: The body connects to the aluminum p
- Page 88 and 89: also allowed for flexibility in cre
- Page 90 and 91: AB1 23 4 5 6 7CD8 9 10 11EFigure 5.
- Page 92 and 93: and minimum voltage range of the DA
- Page 94 and 95: Figure 5. 11 Deleting a Step from L
- Page 96 and 97: Figure 5. 14 Recording Options, Sig
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 5. 17 Right-mouse Click on t
- Page 100 and 101: Zero-OffsetThe Zero-Offset step rem
- Page 102 and 103: Figure 5. 24 Filter Step Set-up, Co
- Page 104 and 105: 5.6 Data ProcessingFigure 5. 26 Wav
- Page 106 and 107: 5.8 Experimental DiscussionAs menti
- Page 108 and 109: 5.8.3 Suggestions for Future Resear
- Page 110 and 111: 110ikxxRekddzkgkn )cosh())(cosh(,
- Page 112 and 113: Proof M ij and B ij are Symmetric T
- Page 114 and 115: BIBILIOGRAPHYANSYS. (n.d.). ANSYS A
- Page 116: Trust, C. (2011). Capital, Operatin
BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.6BodyNo.Bodyλ atT=2.1λ atT=1.0λ atT=0.615 50.22% 53.19% 83.28% 22 50.06% 52.42% 79.01%16 50.21% 53.14% 82.82% 23 50.01% 52.24% 78.25%17 50.21% 53.09% 82.16% 24 50.02% 52.22% 77.75%18 50.20% 53.01% 81.53% 25 49.98% 52.06% 77.10%19 50.18% 52.94% 81.21% 26 49.94% 51.91% 76.49%20 50.13% 52.75% 80.60% 27 49.91% 51.78% 75.91%21 50.10% 52.58% 79.61% 28 49.89% 51.67% 75.38%81
Change language