12.07.2015 Views

Sunyata (Emptiness) in the Mahayana Context By Master Yin-shun ...

Sunyata (Emptiness) in the Mahayana Context By Master Yin-shun ...

Sunyata (Emptiness) in the Mahayana Context By Master Yin-shun ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sunyata</strong> (<strong>Empt<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Context</strong><strong>By</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> ( 印 順 導 師 )www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/miao_yun.pdf<strong>Sunyata</strong> (<strong>Empt<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>) is <strong>the</strong> profound mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mahayana</strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g.Two thousand five hundred years ago, <strong>the</strong> Buddha was able to realise “empt<strong>in</strong>ess” (s.sunyata). <strong>By</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so he freed himself from unsatisfactor<strong>in</strong>ess (s. dukkha). From <strong>the</strong>standpo<strong>in</strong>t of enlightenment, sunyata is <strong>the</strong> reality of all worldly existences (s.dharma). It is <strong>the</strong> realisation of Bodhi — Prajna. From <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of liberation,sunyata is <strong>the</strong> skilful means that disentangle oneself from defilement andunsatisfactor<strong>in</strong>ess. The realisation of sunyata leads one to no attachment and cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g.It is <strong>the</strong> skilful means towards enlightenment and also <strong>the</strong> fruit of enlightenment.There are two ways for us to understand this concept of sunyata <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mahayana</strong>context. One way is to try to understand <strong>the</strong> explanation about its true nature. Theo<strong>the</strong>r way is <strong>the</strong> realisation through practice. What we are go<strong>in</strong>g to discuss now isabout its true nature.<strong>Mahayana</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs have always considered that <strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g of sunyata is anatta<strong>in</strong>ment which is extremely difficult and extraord<strong>in</strong>arily profound.For example, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prajna Sutra it says “That which is profound, has sunyata and nonattachmentas its significance. No form nor deeds, no ris<strong>in</strong>g nor fall<strong>in</strong>g, are itsimplications.”Aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dvadasanikaya Sastra (composed by Nagarjuna, translated to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese byKumarajiva A.D. 408) it says: “The greatest wisdom is <strong>the</strong> so-called sunyata.”This sunyata, no creation, calmness and ext<strong>in</strong>ction (s. nirvana) is of a profoundsignificance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mahayana</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs. Why do we see it as <strong>the</strong> most profoundteach<strong>in</strong>g? This is because <strong>the</strong>re is no worldly knowledge, be it general studies, scienceor philosophy, that can lead to <strong>the</strong> atta<strong>in</strong>ment of <strong>the</strong> state of sunyata. The only path toits realisation is via <strong>the</strong> supreme wisdom of an impassionate and discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>d.It is beyond <strong>the</strong> common worldly understand<strong>in</strong>g.The Significance of <strong>Sunyata</strong> and CessationThe Buddha always used <strong>the</strong> terms void, no ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g, calmness and ext<strong>in</strong>ctionto expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profound mean<strong>in</strong>g of sunyata and cessation. The teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong>Buddha that were described <strong>in</strong> words are generally common to worldlyunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs. If one <strong>in</strong>terprets <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs superficially from <strong>the</strong> words andlanguages used, one will only ga<strong>in</strong> worldly knowledge and not <strong>the</strong> deeper implicationof <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs. The teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Buddha have <strong>the</strong>ir supra- mundane contexts that<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 1 of 8


are beyond <strong>the</strong> worldly knowledge.For example, sunyata and <strong>the</strong> state of nirvana where <strong>the</strong>re is no ris<strong>in</strong>g nor fall<strong>in</strong>g, are<strong>in</strong>terpreted by most people as a state of non-existence and gloom. They fail to realisethat quite <strong>the</strong> opposite, sunyata is of substantial and positive significance.The sutras often use <strong>the</strong> word “great void” to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> significance of sunyata. Ingeneral, we understand <strong>the</strong> “great void” as someth<strong>in</strong>g that conta<strong>in</strong>s absolutely noth<strong>in</strong>g.However, from a Buddhist perspective, <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> “great void” impliessometh<strong>in</strong>g which does not obstruct o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong> which all matters perform <strong>the</strong>irown functions. Materials are form, which by <strong>the</strong>ir nature, imply obstruction. Thespecial characteristic of <strong>the</strong> “great void” is non-obstruction. The “great void” <strong>the</strong>refore,does not serve as an obstacle to <strong>the</strong>m. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> “great void” exhibits no obstructivetendencies, it serves as <strong>the</strong> foundation for matter to function. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if <strong>the</strong>rewas no “great void” nor characteristic of non-obstruction, it would be impossible for<strong>the</strong> material world to exist and function.The “great void” is not separated from <strong>the</strong> material world. The latter depends on <strong>the</strong>former. We can state that <strong>the</strong> pro- found significance of sunyata and <strong>the</strong> nature ofsunyata <strong>in</strong> Buddhism highlights <strong>the</strong> “great void’s” non-obstructive nature.<strong>Sunyata</strong> does not imply <strong>the</strong> “great void”. Instead, it is <strong>the</strong> foundation of all phenomena(form and m<strong>in</strong>d). It is <strong>the</strong> true nature of all phenomena, and it is <strong>the</strong> basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciple ofall existence. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if <strong>the</strong> universe’s existence was not empty norimpermanent, <strong>the</strong>n all result<strong>in</strong>g phenomena could not have arisen due to <strong>the</strong> coexistenceof various causes and <strong>the</strong>re would be no ris<strong>in</strong>g nor fall<strong>in</strong>g. The nature ofsunyata is of positive significance!Calmness and ext<strong>in</strong>ction are <strong>the</strong> opposite of ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g. They are ano<strong>the</strong>r way toexpress that <strong>the</strong>re is no ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g. Ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>the</strong> commoncharacteristics of worldly existence. All phenomena are always <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cycle of ris<strong>in</strong>gand fall<strong>in</strong>g. However, most people concentrate on liv<strong>in</strong>g (ris<strong>in</strong>g). They th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>the</strong>universe and life are <strong>the</strong> reality of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous existence.Buddhism on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, promotes <strong>the</strong> value of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous cessation (fall<strong>in</strong>g).This cessation does not imply that it ceases to exist altoge<strong>the</strong>r. Instead, it is just a state<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous process of phenomena. In this material world, or what we may callthis “state of existence”, everyth<strong>in</strong>g eventually ceases to exist. Cessation is def<strong>in</strong>itely<strong>the</strong> home of all existences. S<strong>in</strong>ce cessation is <strong>the</strong> calm state of existence and <strong>the</strong> eventualrefuge of all phenomena, it is also <strong>the</strong> foundation for all activities and functions.The Amitabha Buddha who was, and is, revered and praised by Buddhists around <strong>the</strong>world, radiates <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite light and life from this “state of cessation”. This state is acont<strong>in</strong>uous process of calmness. It will be <strong>the</strong> eventual refuge for us all. If we th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 2 of 8


carefully about <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions of calmness and ext<strong>in</strong>ction, <strong>the</strong>n we can deduce that<strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> true natural end-po<strong>in</strong>ts of ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g. The true nature of <strong>the</strong> cycle ofris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g is calmness and ext<strong>in</strong>ction. Because of this nature, all chaos andconflicts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> state of ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g will eventually cease. This is atta<strong>in</strong>able by <strong>the</strong>realisation of prajna.Contemplat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Implications of <strong>Sunyata</strong> and Stillness(Nirvana) by Observ<strong>in</strong>g Worldly PhenomenaAll existences exhibit void-nature and nirvana-nature. These natures are <strong>the</strong> reality ofall existence. To realise <strong>the</strong> truth, we have to contemplate and observe our worldlyexistence. We cannot realise <strong>the</strong> former without observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> latter. Consider thisHeart Sutra extract, “Only when Avalokitesvara Bodhisattva practised <strong>the</strong> deep courseof wisdom of Prajna Paramita did he come to realise that <strong>the</strong> five skandhas (aggregates,and material and mental objects) were void.”Profound wisdom leads us to <strong>the</strong> realisation that all existences are of void-nature. Thesutras demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> profound pr<strong>in</strong>ciple can be understood by contemplat<strong>in</strong>gand observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> five skandhas. We cannot realise <strong>the</strong> truth by seek<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>gbeyond <strong>the</strong> material and mental world. The Buddha, us<strong>in</strong>g his perfect wisdom,observed worldly existence from various implications and aspects, and came tounderstand all existences.In summary, <strong>the</strong>re are three paths to this observation:1. We should observe <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g state and <strong>the</strong> current state of conditions. (i.e.,Observation accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> concept of time.)2. We should observe existences accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>ter-relationships. i.e.,Observation via <strong>the</strong> concept of space (ei<strong>the</strong>r two or three-dimensions).3. We should observe <strong>the</strong> true nature of all myriad be<strong>in</strong>gs. This is like observ<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> worldly existences of a po<strong>in</strong>t, a l<strong>in</strong>e and an area. Those with supremewisdom understand <strong>the</strong> true nature of all worldly existences by observ<strong>in</strong>gvertically <strong>the</strong> relationships between <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g and current conditions, andhorizontally <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrelationships. Then we can understand <strong>the</strong> true mean<strong>in</strong>g ofvoid-nature and nirvana-nature.<strong>By</strong> observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g-stage and <strong>the</strong> current-stage conditions, we can verify <strong>the</strong>Law of Impermanence of all worldly existences. All existences, be <strong>the</strong>y material ormental, be <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong> material world, or <strong>the</strong> physical or mental states of sentient be<strong>in</strong>gs,are subject to cont<strong>in</strong>uous change.The world may have certa<strong>in</strong> states of be<strong>in</strong>gs where <strong>the</strong>y stay static or are <strong>in</strong> equilibriumon a temporary basis (for example hibernation). But when we observe <strong>the</strong>m withsupreme wisdom, we will f<strong>in</strong>d that not only do <strong>the</strong>y keep chang<strong>in</strong>g on a yearly basis,but also that this change applies to even every briefest moment. After <strong>the</strong> current stateof conditions have ceased to exist, <strong>the</strong> newly-formed state materialises. This is <strong>the</strong> state<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 3 of 8


of ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g. The ris<strong>in</strong>g and fall<strong>in</strong>g of each small moment reveals that allexistences are ever-mov<strong>in</strong>g and ever-chang<strong>in</strong>g.Conventional scholars have a very good explanation of <strong>the</strong>se ever-chang<strong>in</strong>g worldlyconditions. However <strong>the</strong>y, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> practitioners of dharma, try to make sense of<strong>the</strong> reality from <strong>the</strong> ever-chang<strong>in</strong>g worldly existences. That is, <strong>the</strong>y are fooled by <strong>the</strong>material existences and are not able to understand <strong>the</strong> deeper truth of all existences.Only those with <strong>the</strong> supreme wisdom of <strong>the</strong> Buddha and Mahabodhisattvas realise andunderstand that all existences are illusions. They understand that existences are notreal from <strong>the</strong> observation of <strong>the</strong> flow of chang<strong>in</strong>g existences. The numerous illusionaryexistences may well be diverse and confus<strong>in</strong>g, aris<strong>in</strong>g and decay<strong>in</strong>g. But when we look<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir true nature, we will f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>m void and of nirvana-nature.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, s<strong>in</strong>ce all existences are of nirvana-nature, <strong>the</strong>y appear from <strong>the</strong>perspective of time, to be ever-chang<strong>in</strong>g. They never stay <strong>the</strong> same even for <strong>the</strong> briefestmoment. Impermanence implies existences do not have a permanent entity. This isano<strong>the</strong>r implication of <strong>the</strong> nature of sunyata and stillness.From observations of existence via <strong>in</strong>ter-relationships, we can conclude that noth<strong>in</strong>g is<strong>in</strong>dependent of <strong>the</strong> Law of Causation, and that everyth<strong>in</strong>g is without ego. For example,<strong>the</strong> Buddha expla<strong>in</strong>s that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual sentient be<strong>in</strong>g is composed of physical,physiological and psychological phenomena. The so called ego is a deluded illusionwhich does not exist <strong>in</strong> reality. Its existence depends on <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of bothphysical and mental factors. It is a union of organic phenomena. Thus we call it <strong>the</strong>empirical ego. It is a mistake to cl<strong>in</strong>g to it as an <strong>in</strong>fatuated ego.The Indian concept of <strong>the</strong> supreme spirit implies someone who rules. The spirit is <strong>the</strong>ruler who is <strong>in</strong>dependent of is self-dependent and all causes. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> spiritis <strong>the</strong> one who is free from all primary and secondary causes (for physical and mentalaspects). The spirit is <strong>the</strong> one who has <strong>the</strong> soul of his own body and m<strong>in</strong>d. This is <strong>the</strong>ego or supreme spirit that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologists cl<strong>in</strong>g to. From <strong>the</strong>ir view po<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>the</strong> only wayto avoid physical and mental decay is to be self-determ<strong>in</strong>ed and self-sovereign. In thisway, <strong>the</strong> supreme be<strong>in</strong>g can stay permanent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cycle of re<strong>in</strong>carnation, and return to<strong>the</strong> absolute reality by liberat<strong>in</strong>g himself from life and death.But from <strong>the</strong> profound contemplation and wisdom of <strong>the</strong> Buddha andMahabodhisattvas, we know <strong>the</strong>re is no such reality. Instead, egolessness (non-self) is<strong>the</strong> only path to understand <strong>the</strong> reality of <strong>the</strong> deluded life. All existences are subject to<strong>the</strong> Law of Causes and Conditions. These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> smallest particles, <strong>the</strong>relationship between <strong>the</strong> particles, <strong>the</strong> planets, and <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong>m, upto and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> whole universe! From <strong>the</strong> smallest particles to <strong>the</strong> biggest matter,<strong>the</strong>re exists no absolute <strong>in</strong>dependent identity.<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 4 of 8


Egolessness (non-self) implies <strong>the</strong> void characteristics of all existence.Egolessness (non-self) signifies <strong>the</strong> non-existence of permanent identity for self andexistence (Dharma). <strong>Sunyata</strong> stresses <strong>the</strong> voidness characteristic of self and existence(Dharma). <strong>Sunyata</strong> and egolessness possess similar attributes. As we have discussedbefore, we can observe <strong>the</strong> profound significance of sunyata from <strong>the</strong> perspective of<strong>in</strong>ter- dependent relationships. Consider<strong>in</strong>g dharma-nature and <strong>the</strong> condition ofnirvana, all existences are immaterial and of a void-nature. Then we see each existenceas <strong>in</strong>dependent of each o<strong>the</strong>r. But <strong>the</strong>n we cannot f<strong>in</strong>d any material that does exist<strong>in</strong>dependent of everyth<strong>in</strong>g else. So egolessness also implies void-nature!From <strong>the</strong> observation of all existences, we can <strong>in</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of nirvana and <strong>the</strong>complete cessation of all phenomena. From <strong>the</strong> viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of phenomena, all existencesare so different from each o<strong>the</strong>r, that <strong>the</strong>y may contradict each o<strong>the</strong>r. They are sochaotic. In reality, <strong>the</strong>ir existence is illusionary and arises from conditional causation.They seem to exist on one hand, and yet do not exist on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. They seem to beunited, but yet <strong>the</strong>y are so different to one ano<strong>the</strong>r.They seem to exist and yet <strong>the</strong>y do cease! Ultimately everyth<strong>in</strong>g will return to harmonyand complete calmness. This is <strong>the</strong> nature of all existence. It is <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al rest<strong>in</strong>g place forall. If we can understand this reality and remove our illusions, we can f<strong>in</strong>d this state ofharmony and complete calmness.All our contradictions, impediments and confusion will be converted to equanimity.Free from illusion, complete calmness will be <strong>the</strong> result of atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nirvana. TheBuddha emphasised <strong>the</strong> significance of this atta<strong>in</strong>ment and encouraged <strong>the</strong> direct andprofound contemplation on void-nature. He said, “S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is no absolute selfnaturethus every existence exhibits void-nature. Because it is void, <strong>the</strong>re is no ris<strong>in</strong>gnor fall<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is no ris<strong>in</strong>g nor fall<strong>in</strong>g, thus everyth<strong>in</strong>g was orig<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong>complete calmness. Its self-nature is nirvana.”From <strong>the</strong> viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of time and space, we can surmise that all existences areimpermanent, all existences have no permanent self, and nirvana is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong>cessation of all existences — <strong>the</strong> Three Universal Characteristics. But <strong>the</strong>re are not threedifferent truths. Instead, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> only absolute truth and <strong>the</strong>ultimate reality. This is <strong>the</strong> explanation of Dharma-nature and <strong>the</strong> condition of nirvana.The three characteristics are <strong>the</strong> one characteristic, and vice versa!We may cultivate our meditation, contemplat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impersonality of all existences.This will lead us to enlightenment via <strong>the</strong> path of voidness. Contemplat<strong>in</strong>g nirvana andcomplete calmness leads to enlightenment by <strong>the</strong> path of immaterial form.Contemplat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impermanence of all existences, leads us to enlightenment by <strong>the</strong>path of <strong>in</strong>activity (no desire).<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 5 of 8


The Three Universal Characteristics are <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r implications of Dharma-nature andnirvana. The paths to enlightenment are also <strong>the</strong> same cause of absolute reality. All of<strong>the</strong>m return to <strong>the</strong> Dharma-nature and <strong>the</strong> condition of nirvana. In short, <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gsof <strong>the</strong> Buddha start from <strong>the</strong> observation and contemplation of all worldly phenomena.They are like thousands of streams of water compet<strong>in</strong>g with each o<strong>the</strong>r, and flow<strong>in</strong>gfrom <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> bottom. Eventually, all of <strong>the</strong>m return to <strong>the</strong> oceanof voidness and nirvana.<strong>Sunyata</strong> and Cessation is <strong>the</strong> Truth (Nature) of All Existences.All existences that are recognised by worldly understand<strong>in</strong>g, whe<strong>the</strong>r materially,spiritually or <strong>in</strong>tellectually, have always been misunderstood by us. We cl<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>mas real, physically exist<strong>in</strong>g and permanent. Actually, <strong>the</strong>y are only unreal names.The more precise mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> term “unreal name” is “assumption” or “hypo<strong>the</strong>sis”.It is an empirical name. It is formed by <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of various causes and effects.(These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> effects of mental consciousness.) It does not exist by itself.Everyth<strong>in</strong>g exists relatively. Thus, what is <strong>the</strong> ultimate truth? If we <strong>in</strong>vestigateexistence fur<strong>the</strong>r, we realise that all existences are empty. This is <strong>the</strong> fundamentalcharacteristic and reality of all existence. It is ultimate and absolute. But we should notth<strong>in</strong>k that empty means noth<strong>in</strong>g. It implies <strong>the</strong> disentanglement from <strong>the</strong> worldlymisunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> existence of self, identity, and <strong>the</strong> realisation of <strong>the</strong> absolute.In <strong>the</strong> Sutras and Abhidharma, <strong>the</strong> worldly understand<strong>in</strong>gs are sometimes referred toas all phenomena (Dharma). <strong>Sunyata</strong> is referred to as “Dharma-nature”, and hence<strong>the</strong>re is a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between “phenomena” and “Dhamma-nature”. However, this isonly an expedient explanation that helps us to realise <strong>the</strong> truth of sunyata through <strong>the</strong>phenomena of all existences.We should not th<strong>in</strong>k that “existence” and “nature”; or <strong>the</strong> “phenomena of Dharma”and “Dharma-nature” are someth<strong>in</strong>g contradictory. They are just concepts needed tounderstand <strong>the</strong> implication of sunyata.We may analyse <strong>the</strong> expedient explanation of “existence” and <strong>the</strong> “nature (voidness)”from two aspects:a) The truth of sunyata is <strong>the</strong> nature of each <strong>in</strong>dividual existence. Each step we make <strong>in</strong>understand<strong>in</strong>g that each m<strong>in</strong>or form has a nature that is not describable by words, aresteps to <strong>the</strong> realisation of <strong>the</strong> truth of sunyata. The sunyata of Dharma nature is <strong>the</strong>same for all, it is non dist<strong>in</strong>guishable. However, from our deluded viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, weassume that it is <strong>the</strong> nature of each <strong>in</strong>dividual existence and not an abstract commonnature.b) Dharma-nature is best described as <strong>the</strong> characteristic of equanimity of sunyata. Itcannot be described as many or one and absolute. (One is relative to many!)We cannot say that <strong>the</strong> Dharma-nature is different to existence. But at <strong>the</strong> same time,<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 6 of 8


of th<strong>in</strong>gs”. All Dharma is Dharma-nature. It is not different from Dharma-nature.Dharma and Dharma- nature are not two separate identities, “Phenomena” and“nature” are also not dist<strong>in</strong>guishable ei<strong>the</strong>r. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong>re is no differencebetween pr<strong>in</strong>ciple (absolute) and practice (relative).This also implies that <strong>the</strong>re is no differences among practices. The schools thatemphasise Dharma-nature do not emphasise differences. However, scholars whomisunderstood its implication, always became attached to <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (an absolute),and neglect <strong>the</strong> practice (a relative). This is def<strong>in</strong>itely not <strong>the</strong> aim of <strong>the</strong> schools of“Dharma-nature”.c) The School of Madhyamika, which is also called <strong>the</strong> “School of <strong>Sunyata</strong>”, expla<strong>in</strong>s<strong>the</strong> truth directly. They say that existence and sunyata are nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> same nordifferent. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> School of <strong>Sunyata</strong>, all Dharma arises from causes andconditions. Therefore <strong>the</strong> nature of all Dharma is empty. Because of its empty nature, ithas to rely on causes and conditions <strong>in</strong> order to arise.In o<strong>the</strong>r words, all Dharma arises from causes and conditions, and all Dharma is empty<strong>in</strong> nature. The Law of Dependent Orig<strong>in</strong>ation (existence) and <strong>the</strong> nature of empt<strong>in</strong>ess isnei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> same nor different. They exist mutually. The truth of “sunyata” and“existence”, and “nature” and “phenomena” are not <strong>in</strong> conflict with each o<strong>the</strong>r. Unlike<strong>the</strong> scholars of <strong>the</strong> Dharmalaksana Sect who expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dharma only from <strong>the</strong> aspectof Dependent Orig<strong>in</strong>ation, or <strong>the</strong> scholars of Dharma-nature that expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> existenceof Dharma only from <strong>the</strong> aspect of Dharma-nature, <strong>the</strong> scholars of Madhyamikaexpla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> truth of <strong>the</strong> Dharma from both aspects. Hence this is called <strong>the</strong> Middle Pathwhich does not <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>e to ei<strong>the</strong>r side.These are <strong>the</strong> three ma<strong>in</strong> schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mahayana</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g. The Dharma and Dharmanatureresemble worldly phenomena and entity, but <strong>the</strong>y are not identical. In<strong>Mahayana</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Dharma-nature is <strong>the</strong> nature of each <strong>in</strong>dividual Dharma. Thereis no entity that causes <strong>the</strong> appearance of th<strong>in</strong>gs. Although Dharma (existences) andDharma-nature are not identical, <strong>the</strong>y are also not beyond Dharma (existences). Weshould not th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>the</strong>se concepts are too deep beneath or too high above us. <strong>By</strong>realis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Dharma and Dharma nature from <strong>the</strong> existence (Dharma) around us, <strong>the</strong>ncan <strong>the</strong> real and profound implications of sunyata be portrayed. (Translated by Lim Yang& Shi Neng Rong, edited by Ke Rong, proofread by Shi Neng Rong (21-9-1996))<strong>Sunyata</strong> and <strong>Mahayana</strong> <strong>Master</strong> Y<strong>in</strong>-<strong>shun</strong> Page 8 of 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!