12.07.2015 Views

t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com

t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com

t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>www</strong>.<strong>GOALias</strong>.<strong>blogspot</strong>.<strong>com</strong>Regional Aspirations 163on them. There were opposition and protest riots throughout theState. Leaders of the major tribal <strong>com</strong>munities wanted to separatefrom Assam. They formed the Eastern India Tribal Union whichlater transformed into a more <strong>com</strong>prehensive All Party Hill LeadersConference in 1960. They demanded a tribal State to be carved out ofAssam. Finally instead of one tribal State, several States got carvedout of Assam. At different points of time the Central Government hadto create Meghalaya, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh out of Assam.Tripura and Manipur were upgraded into States too.The reorganisation of the North-East was <strong>com</strong>pleted by 1972. Butthis was not the end of autonomy demands in this region. In Assam,for example, <strong>com</strong>munities like the Bodos, Karbis and Dimasas wantedseparate States. They worked for this demand by mobilising publicopinion and popular movement as well as through insurgency. Oftenthe same area was claimed by more than one <strong>com</strong>munity. It was notpossible to go on making smaller and yet smaller States. Therefore,some other provisions of our federal set up were used to satisfy theirautonomy demands while remaining in Assam. Karbis and Dimasashave been granted autonomy under District Councils while Bodoswere recently granted Autonomous Council.Secessionist movementsDemands for autonomy were easier to respond to, for these involvedusing the various provisions in the Constitution for ac<strong>com</strong>modation ofdiversities. It was much more difficult when some groups demandeda separate country, not in momentary anger but consistently as aprincipled position. The country’s leadership faced this problem for avery long time in at least two States in the North-East. A <strong>com</strong>parisonof these two cases offers us a lesson in democratic politics.After Independence, the Mizo Hills area was made an autonomousdistrict within Assam. Some Mizos believed that they were never apart of British India and therefore did not belong to the Indian union.But the movement for secession gained popular support after theAssam government failed to respond adequately to the great famineof 1959 in Mizo hills. The Mizos’ anger led to the formation of the MizoNational Front (MNF) under the leadership of Laldenga.In 1966 the MNF started an armed campaign for independence.Thus, started a two decade long battle between Mizo insurgents andthe Indian army. The MNF fought a guerilla war, got support fromPakistani government and secured shelter in the then East Pakistan.The Indian security forces countered it with a series of repressivemeasures of which the <strong>com</strong>mon people were the victims. At one pointeven Air Force was used. These measures caused more anger andalienation among the people.At the end of two decades of insurgency everyone was a loser.This is where maturity of the political leadership at both ends madeMy friendChon said thatpeople in Delhi knowmore about the map ofEurope than about theNorth-East in our country.I think she is right at leastabout my schoolmates.Laldenga(1937-1990):Founder andleader of theMizo NationalFront; turned intoa rebel after theexperience of thefamine in 1959;led an armedstruggle againstIndia for twodecades; reacheda settlementand signed anagreement withPrime MinisterRajiv Gandhi in1986; became theChief Minister ofthe newly createdState of Mizoram.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!