t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com
t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com
t.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com www.GOALias.blogspot.com
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>www</strong>.<strong>GOALias</strong>.<strong>blogspot</strong>.<strong>com</strong>Politics of Planned Development 57created enough hurdles for private capital, especially by way ofinstalling systems of licenses and permits for investment. Moreover,the state’s policy to restrict import of goods that could be producedin the domestic market with little or no <strong>com</strong>petition left the privatesector with no incentive to improve their products and make themcheaper. The state controlled more things than were necessary andthis led to inefficiency and corruption.Then there were critics who thought that the state did not doenough. They pointed out that the state did not spend any significantamount for public education and healthcare. The state intervenedonly in those areas where the private sector was not prepared to go.Thus the state helped the private sector to make profit. Also, insteadof helping the poor, the state intervention ended up creating a new‘middle class’ that enjoyed the privileges of high salaries withoutmuch accountability. Poverty did not decline substantially during thisperiod; even when the proportion of the poor reduced, their numberskept going up.Major Out<strong>com</strong>esOf the three objectives that were identified in independent India,discussed in the first three chapters here, the third objective provedmost difficult to realise. Land reforms did not take place effectively inmost parts of the country; political power remained in the hands ofthe landowning classes; and big industrialists continued to benefitand thrive while poverty did not reduce much. The early initiativesfor planned development were at best realising the goals of economicdevelopment of the country and well-being of all its citizens. Theinability to take significant steps in this direction in the very firststage was to be<strong>com</strong>e a political problem. Those who benefited fromunequal development soon became politically powerful and made iteven more difficult to move in the desired direction.FoundationsAn assessment of the out<strong>com</strong>es of this early phase of planneddevelopment must begin by acknowledging the fact that in this periodthe foundations of India’s future economic growth were laid. Some ofthe largest developmental projects in India’s history were undertakenduring this period. These included mega-dams like Bhakhra-Nangaland Hirakud for irrigation and power generation. Some of the this period. Infrastructure for transport and <strong>com</strong>munication wasimproved substantially. Of late, some of these mega projects have<strong>com</strong>e in for a lot of criticism. Yet much of the later economic growth,including that by the private sector, may not have been possible inthe absence of these foundations.