30.11.2012 Views

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. PICKERSGILL, M.I. CHACÓN SÁNCHEZ and D.G. DEBOUCK<br />

number of cultivar-groups to be discriminated. For example, cultivar-group names<br />

such as White Headed Cabbage or Savoy Headed Cabbage (JANSEN et al. 1994) are<br />

in some danger of becoming as lengthy as the pre-Linnaean phrase names which<br />

were abandoned in favour of the simpler binomial system.<br />

When a crop was domesticated more than once, as in common bean, this cannot<br />

easily be reflected in its taxonomy, because the Cultivated Code provides only the<br />

single category of cultivar-group to encompass all variation between genus or species<br />

and cultivar. Growers or consumers of cultivated plants do not need names that<br />

reflect the evolutionary history of what they are growing or eating. Probably only<br />

those concerned with conservation and utilisation of genetic resources of a crop<br />

really need such information. Since we have shown that evolutionary history of a crop<br />

cannot be adequately reflected using the categories provided by the Cultivated Code,<br />

informal categories will no doubt continue to be invented and used. In Phaseolus vulgaris,<br />

the informal categories of gene pool and race have served well to communicate<br />

our present understanding of evolution and genetic diversity in this species.<br />

Whether this will continue to be true when we have the more detailed phylogenies<br />

which DNA studies promise to deliver, only the future will tell. However, the data currently<br />

available suggest that there may be both challenges and surprises ahead.<br />

References<br />

BECERRA VELASQUEZ, V.L. and P. GEPTS (1994): RFLP diversity of common bean<br />

(Phaseolus vulgaris) in its centers of origin. - Genome 37: 256-263.<br />

BEEBE, S., P.W. SKROCH, J. TOHME, M.C. DUQUE, F. PEDRAZA and J. NIENHUIS (2000):<br />

Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American<br />

origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. - Crop Sci. 40: 264-<br />

273.<br />

BEEBE, S., J. RENGIFO, E. GAITAN, M.C. DUQUE and J. TOHME (2001): Diversity and<br />

origin of Andean landraces of common bean. - Crop Sci. 41: 854-862.<br />

CHACÓN SÁNCHEZ, M.I. (2001): Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms and the evolution<br />

and domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ph.D. thesis,<br />

The University of Reading, UK.<br />

DEBOUCK, D. (1991): Systematics and morphology. In: A. VAN SCHOONHOVEN AND O.<br />

VOYSEST (Eds.): Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement, pp. 55-118.<br />

CAB International, Wallingford.<br />

DEBOUCK, D.G., O. TORO, O.M. PAREDES, W.C. JOHNSON and P. GEPTS (1993): Genetic<br />

diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in<br />

northwestern South America. - Econ. Bot. 47: 408-423.<br />

FREYRE, R., R. RIOS, L. GUZMAN, D.G. DEBOUCK and P. GEPTS (1996): Ecogeographic<br />

distribution of Phaseolus spp. (Fabaceae) in Bolivia. - Econ. Bot. 50: 195-215.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!