Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Development and evaluation of a Brassica napus core collection hand, are insect pests of exclusively spring varieties. In the present study the rapeseed plants, sown in randomised field plots, will be screened for damage caused by larvae of Ceutorhynchus spp. and/or adult flea beetles (cf. WINFIELD 1961, LAMB 1989, PENG et al. 1992, GIAMOUSTARIS and MITHEN 1995). As breeding of double-low cultivars of oilseed rape has successfully reduced the seed glucosinolate content, some secondary plant compounds have gained importance with regard to certain pests. In the green matter glucosinolates are beneficial due to their function as feeding deterrents or toxins for polyphagous herbivores, such as field slugs. On the other hand, glucosinolates or their fission products are involved as attractants in interactions with specialised insects feeding and/or reproducing on cruciferous crops (CHEW 1988, GLEN et al. 1990, GIAMOUSTARIS and MITHEN 1995). Therefore, it will be of interest to analyse the material for glucosinolate composition when considerable variation exists regarding the response against the above-mentioned pests. Outlook The extensive phenotypic and quality data is being used to select accessions representing the variability within the species B. napus and to establish a reliable European core collection of 150-200 accessions including Swede turnip or rutabaga types (ssp. napobrassica). In a second step, the B. napus subgroup of the RESGEN project aims at evaluating the core collection regarding resistance to clubroot disease (Plasmodiophora brassicae) and important pests including flea beetles (Psylliodes chrysocephela, Phyllotreta spp.), stem weevils (Ceutorhynchus spp.) and field slugs (Deroceras spp.). Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of their work, which is part of the EU-funded project “Brassica collections for broadening agricultural use, including characterising and utilising genetic variation in Brassica carinata for its exploitation as an oilseed crop” (RESGEN CT99 109-112). References ANAND, I.J. and R.K. DOWNEY (1981): A study of erucic acid alleles in digenomic rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). - Can. J. Plant Sci. 61, 199-203. BOUKEMA, I.W. and T.J.L. VAN HINTUM (1999): Genetic resources. In: C. GÓMEZ- CAMPO (Ed.), Biology of Brassica Coenospecies. Developments in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Vol. 4, pp. 461-479. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands. CHEW, F.S. (1988): Biological effects of glucosinolates. In: H. CUTLER (Ed.), Biologically Active Natural Products, pp. 155-181. - Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC. 288
W. LÜHS et al. DIEDERICHSEN, A. (2001): Brassica. In: HANELT, P. and INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH (Eds.), Mansfeld's Encyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops 3, pp. 1435-1465. Springer, Heidelberg. GIAMOUSTARIS, A. and R. MITHEN (1995): The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. - Ann. appl. Biol. 126, 347-363. GLEN, D.M., H. JONES and J.K. FIELDSEND (1990): Damage to oilseed rape seedlings by the field slug Deroceras reticulatum in relation to glucosinolate concentration. - Ann. appl. Biol. 117, 197-207. KRZYMANSKI, J. and R.K. DOWNEY (1969): Inheritance of fatty acid composition in winter forms of rape seed Brassica napus. - Can. J. Plant Sci. 49, 313-319. LAMB, R.J. (1989): Entomology of oilseed Brassica crops. - Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34, 211-229. LÜHS, W., F. SEYIS, R. SNOWDON, R. BAETZEL and W. FRIEDT (2002): Genetic improvement of Brassica napus by wide hybridisation. - GCIRC Bull. 18, 227-234. PENG, C., M.J. WEISS and M.D. ANDERSON (1992): Flea beetle response, feeding and longevity on oilseed rape and Crambe. - Environ. Entomol. 21(3), 604-609. WINFIELD, A.L. (1961): Observations on the biology and control of the cabbage stem weevil Ceutorhynchus quadridens (Panz.) on Trowse Mustard mustard (Brassica juncea). - Bull. Entomol. Res. 52 (3), 589-600. 289
Page 1 and 2:
Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen
Page 3 and 4:
Preface Preface In October 2001, th
Page 5 and 6:
Preface Asia. M. CHAUVET (Montpelli
Page 7 and 8:
Table of contents Table of contents
Page 9 and 10:
Table of contents Utilisation of pl
Page 11 and 12:
Table of contents Federal Informati
Page 13 and 14:
Recollections of Rudolf Mansfeld Af
Page 15 and 16:
Recollections of Rudolf Mansfeld Ma
Page 17 and 18:
Recollections of Rudolf Mansfeld MA
Page 19 and 20:
R. Mansfeld’s scientific influenc
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
History of Plant Genetic Resources
Page 31 and 32:
History of Plant Genetic Resources
Page 33 and 34:
Mansfeld's Encyclopedia of Agricult
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
The "Mansfeld Database" in its nati
Page 45 and 46:
The "Mansfeld Database" in its nati
Page 47 and 48:
A Species Compendium for Plant Gene
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Some notes on problems of taxonomy
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Theoretical and practical problems
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Development of Vavilov’s concept
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Multiple domestications and their t
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Ethnobotanical studies on cultivate
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Inventorying food plants in France
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
The neglected diversity of immigran
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Unconscious selection in plants und
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
R. V. BOTHMER, TH. V. HINTUM, H. KN
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Diversity of African vegetable Sola
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Molecular diversity studies in two
Page 167 and 168:
The history of the medieval vegetab
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Paintings from the 16 th to 18 th c
Page 181 and 182:
Sugar beets and related wild specie
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Utilisation of plant genetic resour
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Proof of long-term stored potato ge
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 210 and 211:
199
Page 212 and 213:
Structure of table ScientificName L
Page 214 and 215:
Genebank work for preservation of t
Page 216 and 217:
Genebank work for preservation of t
Page 218 and 219:
206 S. CHEBOTAR, M.S. RÖDER, V. KO
Page 220 and 221:
Molecular diversity in the genus Am
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
Page 230 and 231:
A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
Page 232 and 233:
D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜPFFER Fishin
Page 234 and 235:
References D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜP
Page 236 and 237:
A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Pyrus L. Secale L. Sorbus L. Trifol
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
Page 256 and 257: Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi et Oh
Page 260 and 261: Lycopersicon Mill. Nicotiana L. Sal
Page 266 and 267: Pyrus communis L. Trachomitum sarma
Page 268 and 269: R. macropetalus Dougl. ex Hook. R.
Page 270 and 271: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
Page 280 and 281: Tab. 1: Actual European strawberry
Page 282 and 283: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
Page 284 and 285: yield / plant (g) resistance score
Page 286 and 287: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
Page 288 and 289: E.R.J. KELLER, A. SENULA and H. SCH
Page 294 and 295: Molecular mapping and geographical
Page 296 and 297: English translation of the 1979 Rus
Page 298 and 299: Development and evaluation of a Bra
Page 300 and 301: Development and evaluation of a Bra
Page 304 and 305: Maca (Lepidium meyenii) - cultivati
Page 306 and 307: Maca (Lepidium meyenii) - cultivati
Page 308 and 309: Mansfeld's Encyclopedia and Databas
Page 310 and 311: Mansfeld's Encyclopedia and Databas
Page 312 and 313: The Information System On Plant Gen
Page 314 and 315: The Information System On Plant Gen
Page 316 and 317: Characterisation of spring barley g
Page 322 and 323: Evaluation of genetic resources for
Page 324 and 325: Establishment of a German Network f
Page 326 and 327: Establishment of a German Network f
Page 328 and 329: Central register for biological res
Page 330 and 331: Central register for biological res
Page 332 and 333: Federal Information System Genetic
Page 334 and 335: Federal Information System Genetic
Page 336 and 337: Identification of novel interspecif
Page 342 and 343: Morphological characters in garlic
Page 348 and 349: Resynthesised Brassica napus as a g
Page 350 and 351: Resynthesised Brassica napus as a g
Page 352 and 353:
Temperate homegardens of small alpi
Page 354 and 355:
List of participants List of Partic
Page 356 and 357:
List of participants Fischer, Manfr
Page 358 and 359:
List of participants Lühs, Wilfrie
Page 360 and 361:
List of participants Ruge, Brigitte
show all

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?