Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres
Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres
A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER New contributions of E.N. SINSKAYA to N.I. VAVILOV’S theory of the origin of cultivated plants 1. SINSKAYA elaborated a more detailed approach to the analysis of cultivated plants in their centres of origin, called the “differential method of analysis”. This approach is based on the differential characterisation of the endemism of various taxa in a given area, which are divided into the following categories: a) genera which include cultivated species, and which originated in the area; b) genera which include cultivated species, and which have their primary centres of origin or their most important secondary centres of origin in the area; c) cultivated species strictly endemic to the given area, having their origin from wild species in that area; d) cultivated species endemic to the given area, but having their origin from wild species in another area; e) cultivated species which have their primary centres of origin or their most important secondary centres of origin in the area, or which are represented by endemic taxa. SINSKAYA (1966, 1969) proposed to differentiate five basic geographical areas of historical development of cultivated plants (Fig. 1, Table 1), with corresponding sub-areas. For these areas and their subdivisions, SINSKAYA (1969) listed the respective cultivated species together with their classification according to the above-mentioned categories (cf. Appendix 1). 2. In addition, SINSKAYA provided a group of genera, species of which have been domesticated both in the Old and in the New World: Amaranthus L., Bromopsis Fourr., Chenopodium L., Crataegus L., Diospyros L., Eugenia L., Fragaria L., Gossypium L., Grossularia Mill., Juglans L., Lupinus L., Malus L., Phaseolus L., Prunus L., Solanum L., Vitis L.. 3. Developing VAVILOV’S ideas on centres of origin, SINSKAYA (1966) described the African area of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants. 4. The concept of dependent areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants was introduced, based on VAVILOV’s concept of secondary centres of diversity. Agriculture in such areas is always younger, although the period of their development is still long, as can be judged from the large number of species domesticated from the wild flora of these areas. These dependent areas have the following characteristics: 1) The endemic flora is often not as rich and not as old as in other areas. 2) The history of agriculture is not as old. 227
E.N. SINSKAYA’S inventory of plant taxa 228 3) Few or no species have been domesticated there, let alone spread to other areas. 4) Fewer species and forms of wild-growing plants have been introduced into cultivation. 5) No or very few endemic genera that include species of domesticated plants. 6) If there are endemic cultivated plants, they are neither economically nor agriculturally of greater importance in this area. 7) These areas are areas of introduction of domesticated plants from elsewhere rather than areas of their distribution to other places. The flora of cultivated plants in dependent areas consists of elements from the ancient basic areas of development of cultivated plants. Agriculture in these large regions developed under the influence of the basic areas. For example, agriculture in North America developed mainly on the basis of Mexican and Central American crops and, later on, on crops from the Old World. In Central and Northern Europe, on the Russian Plain and in Siberia, agriculture is based primarily on domesticated plants introduced from Asia Minor and regions around the Mediterranean, etc. Ancient Mediterranean elements and southwestern Asiatic ones predominate in the domesticated flora of Ethiopia but are not clearly delimited from those of other African areas. Elements from southern Asia occur there as well. However, in the dependent areas, indigenous domesticated plants always occur, and it is necessary to consider these elements separately. Results The cultivated species, which according to SINSKAYA have been the main components of plant production since ancient times in each basic area of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants, i.e., in the main areas of origin of agriculture and horticulture, are listed in Appendix 1. The species of the dependent areas are given in Appendix 2. In the Mediterranean, SINSKAYA separated Egypt as one of the most ancient centres of agriculture. Together with the indigenous species of cultivated plants, an astonishing diversity of endemic varieties and forms occurred in a large number of species (ca. 50), which had been introduced into the country ca. 8,000-7,000 years ago (Appendix 3). The ‘differential method of the analysis’ of the cultivated floras gives a much better idea of their origin and evolution. Thus, the level of knowledge of biodiversity of each crop and its geographical distribution is of fundamental importance.
- Page 189 and 190: Sugar beets and related wild specie
- Page 191 and 192: Sugar beets and related wild specie
- Page 193 and 194: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 195 and 196: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 197 and 198: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 199 and 200: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 201 and 202: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 203 and 204: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 205 and 206: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 207 and 208: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 210 and 211: 199
- Page 212 and 213: Structure of table ScientificName L
- Page 214 and 215: Genebank work for preservation of t
- Page 216 and 217: Genebank work for preservation of t
- Page 218 and 219: 206 S. CHEBOTAR, M.S. RÖDER, V. KO
- Page 220 and 221: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 222 and 223: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 224 and 225: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 226 and 227: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 228 and 229: A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
- Page 230 and 231: A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
- Page 232 and 233: D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜPFFER Fishin
- Page 234 and 235: References D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜP
- Page 236 and 237: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 238 and 239: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 242 and 243: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 244 and 245: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 246 and 247: Pyrus L. Secale L. Sorbus L. Trifol
- Page 248 and 249: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 250 and 251: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 252 and 253: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 254 and 255: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 256 and 257: Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi et Oh
- Page 258 and 259: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 260 and 261: Lycopersicon Mill. Nicotiana L. Sal
- Page 262 and 263: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 264 and 265: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 266 and 267: Pyrus communis L. Trachomitum sarma
- Page 268 and 269: R. macropetalus Dougl. ex Hook. R.
- Page 270 and 271: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 272 and 273: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 274 and 275: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 276 and 277: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 278 and 279: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 280 and 281: Tab. 1: Actual European strawberry
- Page 282 and 283: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
- Page 284 and 285: yield / plant (g) resistance score
- Page 286 and 287: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
- Page 288 and 289: E.R.J. KELLER, A. SENULA and H. SCH
A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER<br />
New contributions of E.N. SINSKAYA to N.I. VAVILOV’S theory of the origin of cultivated<br />
plants<br />
1. SINSKAYA elaborated a more detailed approach to the analysis of cultivated plants<br />
in their centres of origin, called the “differential method of analysis”. This approach<br />
is based on the differential characterisation of the endemism of various taxa in a<br />
given area, which are divided into the following categories:<br />
a) genera which include cultivated species, and which originated in the area;<br />
b) genera which include cultivated species, and which have their primary centres<br />
of origin or their most important secondary centres of origin in the area;<br />
c) cultivated species strictly endemic to the given area, having their origin from<br />
wild species in that area;<br />
d) cultivated species endemic to the given area, but having their origin from wild<br />
species in another area;<br />
e) cultivated species which have their primary centres of origin or their most important<br />
secondary centres of origin in the area, or which are represented by<br />
endemic taxa.<br />
SINSKAYA (1966, 1969) proposed to differentiate five basic geographical areas of<br />
historical development of cultivated plants (Fig. 1, Table 1), with corresponding<br />
sub-areas. For these areas and their subdivisions, SINSKAYA (1969) listed the respective<br />
cultivated species together with their classification according to the<br />
above-mentioned categories (cf. Appendix 1).<br />
2. In addition, SINSKAYA provided a group of genera, species of which have been<br />
domesticated both in the Old and in the New World: Amaranthus L., Bromopsis<br />
Fourr., Chenopodium L., Crataegus L., Diospyros L., Eugenia L., Fragaria L.,<br />
Gossypium L., Grossularia Mill., Juglans L., Lupinus L., Malus L., Phaseolus L.,<br />
Prunus L., Solanum L., Vitis L..<br />
3. Developing VAVILOV’S ideas on centres of origin, SINSKAYA (1966) described the<br />
African area of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants.<br />
4. The concept of dependent areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated<br />
plants was introduced, based on VAVILOV’s concept of secondary centres of<br />
diversity. Agriculture in such areas is always younger, although the period of their<br />
development is still long, as can be judged from the large number of species domesticated<br />
from the wild flora of these areas. These dependent areas have the<br />
following characteristics:<br />
1) The endemic flora is often not as rich and not as old as in other areas.<br />
2) The history of agriculture is not as old.<br />
227