Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

30.11.2012 Views

A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER “Es ist dagegen eingewendet worden, die Aufstellung und Benennung so vieler Varietäten erschwere die Übersicht. Es läßt sich aber die Mannigfaltigkeit einer Sippe allgemein nur so erfassen und darstellen, daß man die unterscheidbaren Untergruppen beschreibt und benennt. Solche gibt es bei polymorphen Sippen eben sehr viele.” [“It has been objected that the setting up and naming of so many varieties complicates the overall view. However, in general, the diversity of a group can only be grasped and displayed by describing and naming the subgroups that can be distinguished, of which there are very many in polymorphic species.”] (MANSFELD 1951, p. 41). SINSKAYA (1966) continued VAVILOV’s work to establish the boundaries of the centres of origin of cultivated plants and to specify the relationships between these centres (areas). At present, botanical investigations concerning centres of origin continue, and the collections made are being thoroughly studied. Many amendments can be made to VAVILOV’S theories concerning the centres of origin of cultivated plants but all amount only to correction of details: “The basic composition of cultivated plants, typical of a particular centre, remains stable” (SINSKAYA 1966). With respect to the historical character of VAVILOV’S work, SINSKAYA draws our attention to the prevalent use of the terms “historical-geographical area” and “geographical areas of historical development” (of a cultivated flora) which appear regularly in VAVILOV’S papers (1924- 1940; see FILATENKO et al. 1999). This is the main new item in her methodological approach. Tab. 1: Basic areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants (after SINSKAYA 1966, 1969) Area Sub-Area I. Ancient Mediterranean II. East Asia III. South Asia IV. Africa I.1. Southwest Asia I.1.1. Anterior Asia (western Southwest Asia: Transcaucasus, Asia Minor, Near East, Iraq, West Iran) I.1.2. Middle Asia (eastern Southwest Asia: Turkestan, Afghanistan, East Iran, Northwest India, Pakistan) I.2. Mediterranean II.1. Northeast Asia (Japan, Manchuria) II.2. Southeast and Central China III.1. South China, India and Sri Lanka III.2. Malesia V. New World V.1. Central America V.2. South America 225

E.N. SINSKAYA’S inventory of plant taxa 226

A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER<br />

“Es ist dagegen eingewendet worden, die Aufstellung und Benennung so vieler<br />

Varietäten erschwere die Übersicht. Es läßt sich aber die Mannigfaltigkeit einer Sippe<br />

allgemein nur so erfassen und darstellen, daß man die unterscheidbaren Untergruppen<br />

beschreibt und benennt. Solche gibt es bei polymorphen Sippen eben sehr<br />

viele.” [“It has been objected that the setting up and naming of so many varieties<br />

complicates the overall view. However, in general, the diversity of a group can only<br />

be grasped and displayed by describing and naming the subgroups that can be distinguished,<br />

of which there are very many in polymorphic species.”] (MANSFELD 1951,<br />

p. 41).<br />

SINSKAYA (1966) continued VAVILOV’s work to establish the boundaries of the centres<br />

of origin of cultivated plants and to specify the relationships between these centres<br />

(areas). At present, botanical investigations concerning centres of origin continue,<br />

and the collections made are being thoroughly studied. Many amendments can be<br />

made to VAVILOV’S theories concerning the centres of origin of cultivated plants but all<br />

amount only to correction of details: “The basic composition of cultivated plants, typical<br />

of a particular centre, remains stable” (SINSKAYA 1966). With respect to the historical<br />

character of VAVILOV’S work, SINSKAYA draws our attention to the prevalent use<br />

of the terms “historical-geographical area” and “geographical areas of historical development”<br />

(of a cultivated flora) which appear regularly in VAVILOV’S papers (1924-<br />

1940; see FILATENKO et al. 1999). This is the main new item in her methodological<br />

approach.<br />

Tab. 1: Basic areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants<br />

(after SINSKAYA 1966, 1969)<br />

Area Sub-Area<br />

I. Ancient<br />

Mediterranean<br />

II. East Asia<br />

III. South Asia<br />

IV. Africa<br />

I.1. Southwest Asia<br />

I.1.1. Anterior Asia (western Southwest Asia: Transcaucasus,<br />

Asia Minor, Near East, Iraq, West Iran)<br />

I.1.2. Middle Asia (eastern Southwest Asia: Turkestan, Afghanistan,<br />

East Iran, Northwest India, Pakistan)<br />

I.2. Mediterranean<br />

II.1. Northeast Asia (Japan, Manchuria)<br />

II.2. Southeast and Central China<br />

III.1. South China, India and Sri Lanka<br />

III.2. Malesia<br />

V. New World V.1. Central America<br />

V.2. South America<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!