Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres
Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres
A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER “Es ist dagegen eingewendet worden, die Aufstellung und Benennung so vieler Varietäten erschwere die Übersicht. Es läßt sich aber die Mannigfaltigkeit einer Sippe allgemein nur so erfassen und darstellen, daß man die unterscheidbaren Untergruppen beschreibt und benennt. Solche gibt es bei polymorphen Sippen eben sehr viele.” [“It has been objected that the setting up and naming of so many varieties complicates the overall view. However, in general, the diversity of a group can only be grasped and displayed by describing and naming the subgroups that can be distinguished, of which there are very many in polymorphic species.”] (MANSFELD 1951, p. 41). SINSKAYA (1966) continued VAVILOV’s work to establish the boundaries of the centres of origin of cultivated plants and to specify the relationships between these centres (areas). At present, botanical investigations concerning centres of origin continue, and the collections made are being thoroughly studied. Many amendments can be made to VAVILOV’S theories concerning the centres of origin of cultivated plants but all amount only to correction of details: “The basic composition of cultivated plants, typical of a particular centre, remains stable” (SINSKAYA 1966). With respect to the historical character of VAVILOV’S work, SINSKAYA draws our attention to the prevalent use of the terms “historical-geographical area” and “geographical areas of historical development” (of a cultivated flora) which appear regularly in VAVILOV’S papers (1924- 1940; see FILATENKO et al. 1999). This is the main new item in her methodological approach. Tab. 1: Basic areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants (after SINSKAYA 1966, 1969) Area Sub-Area I. Ancient Mediterranean II. East Asia III. South Asia IV. Africa I.1. Southwest Asia I.1.1. Anterior Asia (western Southwest Asia: Transcaucasus, Asia Minor, Near East, Iraq, West Iran) I.1.2. Middle Asia (eastern Southwest Asia: Turkestan, Afghanistan, East Iran, Northwest India, Pakistan) I.2. Mediterranean II.1. Northeast Asia (Japan, Manchuria) II.2. Southeast and Central China III.1. South China, India and Sri Lanka III.2. Malesia V. New World V.1. Central America V.2. South America 225
E.N. SINSKAYA’S inventory of plant taxa 226
- Page 187 and 188: Sugar beets and related wild specie
- Page 189 and 190: Sugar beets and related wild specie
- Page 191 and 192: Sugar beets and related wild specie
- Page 193 and 194: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 195 and 196: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 197 and 198: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 199 and 200: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 201 and 202: Utilisation of plant genetic resour
- Page 203 and 204: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 205 and 206: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 207 and 208: Proof of long-term stored potato ge
- Page 210 and 211: 199
- Page 212 and 213: Structure of table ScientificName L
- Page 214 and 215: Genebank work for preservation of t
- Page 216 and 217: Genebank work for preservation of t
- Page 218 and 219: 206 S. CHEBOTAR, M.S. RÖDER, V. KO
- Page 220 and 221: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 222 and 223: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 224 and 225: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 226 and 227: Molecular diversity in the genus Am
- Page 228 and 229: A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
- Page 230 and 231: A. DIEDERICHSEN, D. KESSLER, P. KUS
- Page 232 and 233: D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜPFFER Fishin
- Page 234 and 235: References D. ENNEKING and H. KNÜP
- Page 236 and 237: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 240 and 241: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 242 and 243: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 244 and 245: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 246 and 247: Pyrus L. Secale L. Sorbus L. Trifol
- Page 248 and 249: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 250 and 251: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 252 and 253: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 254 and 255: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 256 and 257: Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi et Oh
- Page 258 and 259: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 260 and 261: Lycopersicon Mill. Nicotiana L. Sal
- Page 262 and 263: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 264 and 265: A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KN
- Page 266 and 267: Pyrus communis L. Trachomitum sarma
- Page 268 and 269: R. macropetalus Dougl. ex Hook. R.
- Page 270 and 271: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 272 and 273: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 274 and 275: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 276 and 277: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 278 and 279: U. FREYTAG, G.H. BUCK-S ORLIN and B
- Page 280 and 281: Tab. 1: Actual European strawberry
- Page 282 and 283: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
- Page 284 and 285: yield / plant (g) resistance score
- Page 286 and 287: H. GRAUSGRUBER, H. BOINTNER, R. TUM
A.A. FILATENKO, K. PISTRICK, H. KNÜPFFER and K. HAMMER<br />
“Es ist dagegen eingewendet worden, die Aufstellung und Benennung so vieler<br />
Varietäten erschwere die Übersicht. Es läßt sich aber die Mannigfaltigkeit einer Sippe<br />
allgemein nur so erfassen und darstellen, daß man die unterscheidbaren Untergruppen<br />
beschreibt und benennt. Solche gibt es bei polymorphen Sippen eben sehr<br />
viele.” [“It has been objected that the setting up and naming of so many varieties<br />
complicates the overall view. However, in general, the diversity of a group can only<br />
be grasped and displayed by describing and naming the subgroups that can be distinguished,<br />
of which there are very many in polymorphic species.”] (MANSFELD 1951,<br />
p. 41).<br />
SINSKAYA (1966) continued VAVILOV’s work to establish the boundaries of the centres<br />
of origin of cultivated plants and to specify the relationships between these centres<br />
(areas). At present, botanical investigations concerning centres of origin continue,<br />
and the collections made are being thoroughly studied. Many amendments can be<br />
made to VAVILOV’S theories concerning the centres of origin of cultivated plants but all<br />
amount only to correction of details: “The basic composition of cultivated plants, typical<br />
of a particular centre, remains stable” (SINSKAYA 1966). With respect to the historical<br />
character of VAVILOV’S work, SINSKAYA draws our attention to the prevalent use<br />
of the terms “historical-geographical area” and “geographical areas of historical development”<br />
(of a cultivated flora) which appear regularly in VAVILOV’S papers (1924-<br />
1940; see FILATENKO et al. 1999). This is the main new item in her methodological<br />
approach.<br />
Tab. 1: Basic areas of historical development of the flora of cultivated plants<br />
(after SINSKAYA 1966, 1969)<br />
Area Sub-Area<br />
I. Ancient<br />
Mediterranean<br />
II. East Asia<br />
III. South Asia<br />
IV. Africa<br />
I.1. Southwest Asia<br />
I.1.1. Anterior Asia (western Southwest Asia: Transcaucasus,<br />
Asia Minor, Near East, Iraq, West Iran)<br />
I.1.2. Middle Asia (eastern Southwest Asia: Turkestan, Afghanistan,<br />
East Iran, Northwest India, Pakistan)<br />
I.2. Mediterranean<br />
II.1. Northeast Asia (Japan, Manchuria)<br />
II.2. Southeast and Central China<br />
III.1. South China, India and Sri Lanka<br />
III.2. Malesia<br />
V. New World V.1. Central America<br />
V.2. South America<br />
225