30.11.2012 Views

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recollections of Rudolf Mansfeld<br />

After a short time as a prisoner of war, in 1946 he acceded to a request by Hans<br />

Stubbe, the first director of the Gatersleben Institute, to work together in Gatersleben.<br />

At first he was employed as a laboratory technician with a very low salary, but before<br />

he could be established as a scientific assistant he had to undergo a de-nazification<br />

programme, in 1948. (To make the museum politically secure, the younger employees<br />

in Dahlem had been recommended by their superiors to enter branch organisations<br />

of the NSDAP - National Socialist German Workers’ Party). In 1949, after the<br />

departure of W. Rothmaler to Halle, Mansfeld was appointed as director of his Department,<br />

and later, by the German Academy of Sciences, as Professor and Director<br />

at the Institute: these appointments he held until his death.<br />

Mansfeld never had ambitions for an university career, and he therefore had not<br />

qualified as a university lecturer like many other curators; nor did he feel any urge to<br />

undertake lectures. However he loved to discuss problems of his special field with<br />

small groups or with individuals and so pass on his decades of experience in this<br />

area of systematic botany. He hated hasty conclusions and was very balanced in his<br />

arguments. Although his lectures were not brilliant as regards rhetoric (as for instance<br />

with Kurt Mothes, the director at that time of the Chemical-Physiological Department<br />

in Gatersleben), they captivated his audience by their objectivity and logical<br />

structure and in this way they resembled the lecturing style of H. Stubbe, the Director<br />

of the Institute. He spent much time in personal discussions and thus exercised on us<br />

younger ones a gentle formative influence, so that we can rightfully call ourselves his<br />

pupils. He agreed to share problems in his special field with representatives of other<br />

disciplines, which was of great importance in the Gatersleben Institute with its heterogeneous<br />

staff.<br />

In his method of work Mansfeld needed to reorient himself again completely in<br />

Gatersleben. Previously a classical herbarium systematist, here he had to deal with<br />

collections of living plants, and systematic problems which occurred especially at the<br />

lowest levels, mostly within species, rather than at the family level. Little known is the<br />

fact that his Department was also included in the programme initiated by H. Stubbe<br />

to examine the postulates of Lysenko biology, concerning the relations between embryo<br />

and endosperm. (The conversion of one species into another, by the influence<br />

of the endosperm on the developing embryo, had been postulated with wheat-maize<br />

grafting. However the apparent development of “maize seedlings from wheat embryos”<br />

turned out to be due to production of twin embryos in the maize ovules, the<br />

second of which had not been removed).<br />

Rudolf Mansfeld was very modest and undemanding - his life being dedicated to<br />

work, and he rarely took holidays. He never took advantage of his position and he<br />

had an outspoken aversion to privileges. An impressive example is his speedy refusal<br />

of the ‘Deputatschwein’ (payment-in-kind-pig), which in the post-war years was<br />

fattened annually for the heads of departments in the then Department of Agriculture<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!