12.07.2015 Views

Parliament's Watchdogs — New Zealand 's Officers of Parliament

Parliament's Watchdogs — New Zealand 's Officers of Parliament

Parliament's Watchdogs — New Zealand 's Officers of Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spring 2010 <strong>Parliament</strong>’s <strong>Watchdogs</strong> — NZ’s <strong>Officers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> 135<strong>Zealand</strong> has reserved the status <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> to a small group <strong>of</strong>agencies.Understanding Role <strong>of</strong> an Officer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>Before 1989, the powers, duties, and functions <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> in <strong>New</strong><strong>Zealand</strong> were determined by the individual statutory provisions for each position.The general rules that governed the funding arrangements for <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>and the relationship between an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> and <strong>Parliament</strong>, were notexplicitly defined.In 1989 <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>’s Finance and Expenditure Select Committee conducted aninquiry into <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. In its report to the House, the committee notedthat <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> had been created ad hoc, and that a formula was neededto define, protect, and strengthen their position. 10 There appears to have been nosystematic thinking until then about why a non-elected statutory <strong>of</strong>ficer should bedesignated an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>, nor about what this status really meant inconstitutional or practical terms.Finance and Expenditure Committee CriteriaThe 1989 report <strong>of</strong> the Finance and Expenditure Committee sets out five criteria t<strong>of</strong>or the creation <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> — criteria from which the practicalworkings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fices now flow. The committee considered that an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong><strong>Parliament</strong> must be created only to provide a check on the arbitrary use <strong>of</strong> power bythe executive; that an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> must discharge only functions which theHouse itself, if it so wished, might carry out; that an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> should becreated only rarely; that the House should, from time to time, review theappropriateness <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>’s status as an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>;and that each <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> should be created in separate legislationprincipally devoted to that position. 11The committee agreed that the primary function <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> was toact as a check on the executive, as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>’s constitutional role <strong>of</strong>ensuring the accountability <strong>of</strong> the executive.While the 1989 FEC inquiry produced a set <strong>of</strong> criteria for creating an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong><strong>Parliament</strong>, the committee chose not to standardise the features <strong>of</strong> the various<strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. This perhaps explains why the committee recommended thateach <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> should be created in separate, dedicated legislation.Nevertheless, the committee considered that <strong>Parliament</strong> needed a larger role in theappointment, funding, and accountability <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. While the<strong>of</strong>fices’ operations expenses had until then been funded by separate parliamentaryappropriations, the appropriation processes were essentially the same as those thatapplied to Government departments — only the salaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice holders wereprotected by a permanent appropriation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!