Liu, M., Y. Yang, S. Zhengkang, S. Wang, W. Min, and W. Yongge(2007). Active tectonics and intracontinental earthquakes inChina; the kinematics and geodynamics. In Continental IntraplateEarthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues, ed. S. Stein and S.Mazzotti, 299–318. Geological Society of America Special Paper425. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.Madole, R. F. (1988). Stratigraphic evidence of Holocene faulting in themid-continent: The Meers fault, southwestern Oklahoma. Bulletinof the Geological Society of America 100, 392–401.Malik, J. N., A. A. Shah, A. K. Sahoo, B. Puhan, C. Banerjee, D. P.Shinde, N. Juyal, A. K. Singhvi, and S. K. Rath (2010). Activefault, fault growth and segment linkage along the Janauri anticline(frontal foreland fault), NW Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 483,327–343.McCalpin, J. P., ed. (2009). Paleoseismology. Amsterdam: AcademicPress, 649 pp.McCalpin, J. P., and V. S. Khromovskikh (1995). Holocene paleoseismicityof the Tunka fault, Baikal rift, Russia. Tectonics 14, 594–605.McKenzie, D., and M. J. Bickle (1988). The volume and composition ofmelt generated by extension of the lithosphere. Journal of Petrology29, 625–679.McNulty, W. E., and S. F. Obermeier (1999). Liquefaction evidence for atleast two strong Holocene paleo-earthquakes in central and southwesternIllinois, USA. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience5, 133–146.Mueller, C. S. (2010). The influence of maximum magnitude on seismichazardestimates in the central and eastern United States. Bulletinof the Seismological Society of America 100, 699–711.Neumann, E. R., and I. B. Ramberg (1978). Paleorifts: Concludingremarks. In Tectonics and Geophysics of Continental Rifts, ed.I. B. Ramberg and E. R. Neumann, 409–424. Dordrecht, theNetherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co.Obermeier, S. F. (1998). Liquefaction evidence for strong earthquakesof Holocene and latest Pleistocene ages in the states of Indiana andIllinois, USA. Engineering Geology 50, 227–254.Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (2007). A Performance-basedApproach to Define the Site-specific Earthquake Ground Motion.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Guide 1.208, Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, 53 pp.; http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/rg/01-208/01-208.pdf.Lastaccessed July 21, 2011.Olafsson, M., and D. H. Eggler (1983). Phase relations of amphibole,amphibole-carbonate, and phlogopite-carbonate peridotite:Petrologic constraints on the asthenosphere. Earth and PlanetaryScience Letters 64, 305–315.Peizhen, Z., B. C. Burchfiel, P. Molnar, Z. Weiqi, J. Dechen, D. Qidong,W. Yipeng, L. Royden, and F. Song (1991). Amount and style oflate Cenozoic deformation in the Liupan Shan area, NingxiaAutonomous Region, China. Tectonics 10, 1,111–1,129.Perry, W. J., D. H. Roeder, and D. R. Lageson, comps. (1984). NorthAmerican Thrust-faulted Terranes: Selected Papers Reprinted fromthe AAPG Bulletin and other Geological Journals. Tulsa, OK:American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 466 pp.Petersen, M. D., A. D. Frankel, S. C. Harmsen, C. S. Mueller, K. M.Haller, R. L. Wheeler, R. L. Wesson, Y. Zeng, O. S. Boyd, D. M.Perkins, N. Luco, E. H. Field, C. J. Wills, and K. S. Rukstales(2008). Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United StatesNational Seismic Hazard Maps. USGS Open-File Report 2008–1128, 119 pp.; http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/.Last accessed July 21, 2011.Qiu, Y. M., S. Gao, N. J. McNaughton, D. I. Groves, and W. Ling (2000).First evidence of >3.2 Ga continental crust in the Yangtze craton ofsouth China and its implications for Archean crustal evolution andPhanerozoic tectonics. Geology 28, 11–14.Rangin, C., P. Huchon, X. Le Pichon, H. Bellon, C. Lepvrier, D. Roques,N. D. Hoe, and P. V. Quynh (1995). Cenozoic deformation of centraland south Vietnam. Tectonophysics 251, 179–196.Reedman, A. J., and D. H. Kim (1997). Korea—South Korea. InEncyclopedia of European and Asian Regional Geology, ed. E. M.Moores and R. W. Fairbridge, 473–483. London: Chapman andHall.Ren, J., K. Tamaki, S. Li, and Z. Junxia (2002). Late Mesozoic andCenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in eastern China and adjacentareas. Tectonophysics 344, 175–205.Rich, J. L. (1934). Mechanics of low-angle overthrust faulting as illustratedby Cumberland Thrust Block, Virginia, Kentucky, andTennessee. Bulletin of the American Association of PetroleumGeologists 18, 1,584–1,596.Risk Engineering Inc., Geomatrix Consultants Inc., Woodward-ClydeConsultants, and Cygna Corporation (1986). Seismic HazardMethodology for the Central and Eastern United States. NP-4726,11 vols. Report for Seismicity Owners Group and Electric PowerResearch Institute, Palo Alto, CA.Rodgers, J. (1950). Mechanics of Appalachian folding as illustratedby Sequatchie anticline, Tennessee and Alabama. AmericanAssociation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 34, 672–681.Rodgers, J. (1970). The Tectonics of the Appalachians. New York: Wiley,271 pp.Russ, D. P. (1979). Late Holocene faulting and earthquake recurrencein the Reelfoot Lake area, northwestern Tennessee. Bulletin of theGeological Society of America 90, 1,013–1,018.Sengor, A. M. C., and B. A. Natal’in (2001). Rifts of the world. InMantle Plumes: Their Identification through Time, ed. R. E. Ernstand K. L. Buchan, 389–482. Geological Society of America SpecialPaper 352. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.Shen, Z.-K., J. Lu, M. Wang, and R. Burgmann (2005). Contemporarycrustal deformation around the southeast borderland of theTibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, B11409,doi:10.1029/2004JB003421.Simons, W. J. F., A. Soquet, C. Vigny, B. A. C. Ambrosius, S. H. Abu, C.Promthong, C. Subarya, D. A. Sarsito, S. Matheussen, P. Morgan,and W. Spakman (2007). A decade of GPS in southeast Asia—resolving Sundaland motion and boundaries. Journal of GeophysicalResearch 112, B06420, doi:10.1029/2005JB003868.Takahashi, E., and I. Kushiro (1983). Melting of a dry peridotite at highpressures and basalt magma genesis. American Mineralogist 68,859–879.Tarr, A. C., A. Villasenor, K. P. Furlong, S. Rhea, and H. M. Benz (2010).Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2007. USGS Scientific InvestigationsMap I-3064 (1 sheet), scale 1:25,000,000.Terman, M. J. (1974). Tectonic map of China and Mongolia. Two sheets,scale 1:5,000,000. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.Tuttle, M. P. (2001). The use of liquefaction featurees in paleoseismology—lessonslearned in the New Madrid seismic zone, centralUnited States. Journal of Seismology 5, 361–380.Tuttle, M. P., H. Al-Shukri, and H. Mahdi (2006). Very large earthquakescentered southwest of the New Madrid seismic zone 5,000–7,000 years ago. Seismological Research Letters 77, 755–770.Walker, R. T. (2009). The active tectonics of NE Asia. Abstracts andPrograms of the Geological Society of America 41, 658 (abstract).Walker, R. T., E. Nissen, E. Molor, and A. Bayasgalan (2007).Reinterpretation of the active faulting in central Mongolia. Geology35, 759–762.Wang, H., M. Liu, J. Cao, X. Shen, and G. Zhang (2011). Slip ratesand seismic moment deficits on major active faults in mainlandChina. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, B02405;doi:10.1029/2010JB007821.Wang, T. K., M.-K. Chen, C.-S. Lee, and K. Xia (2006). Seismic imagingof the transitional crust across the northeastern margin of theSouth China Sea. Tectonophysics 412, 237–254.Wheeler, R. L. (1997). Boundary separating the seismically activeReelfoot rift from the sparsely seismic Rough Creek graben,Kentucky and Illinois. Seismological Research Letters 68, 586–598.982 Seismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011
Wheeler, R. L. (2008). Paleoseismic targets, seismic hazard, and urbanareas in the central and eastern United States. Bulletin of theSeismological Society of America 98, 1,572–1,580.Wheeler, R. L. (2009a). Methods of Mmax Estimation East of the RockyMountains. USGS Open–File Report 2009–1018, 43 pp.; http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1018. Last accessed July 21, 2011.Wheeler, R. L. (2009b). Sizes of the largest possible earthquakes inthe Central and Eastern United States: Summary of a workshop,September 8—9, 2008, Golden, Colorado, U.S. Geological SurveyOpen–File Report 2009–1263, 304 pp. (available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1263/, accessed July 21, 2011).Whitford-Stark, J. L. (1987). A Survey of Cenozoic Volcanism onMainland Asia. Geological Society of America Special Paper 213.Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 74 pp.Wilson, M. (1989). Igneous Petrogenesis. London: Chapman and Hall,466 pp.Wu, F.-Y., J.-Q. Lin, S. A. Wilde, X. O. Zhang, and J.-H. Yang (2005).Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneousevent in eastern China. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 233,103–119.Yang, J.-H., S. O’Reilly, R. J. Walker, W. Griffin, F.-Y. Wu, M. Zhang,and N. Pearson (2010). Diachronous decratonization of the Sino-Korean craton: Geochemistry of mantle xenoliths from NorthKorea. Geology 38, 799–802.Yang, J.-H., F.-Y. Wu, and S. A. Wilde (2008). Mesozoic decratonizationof the North China block. Geology 36, 467–470.Yin, A. (2010). Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Asia: A preliminary synthesis.Tectonophysics 488, 293–325.Yu, Z., S. Wu, D. Zou, D. Feng, and H. Zhao (2008). Seismic profilesacross the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Laizhou Bay, Bohai Sea,eastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Science 33, 383–394.Zhang, Z. M., J. G. Liou, and R. G. Coleman (1984). An outline ofthe plate tectonics of China. Bulletin of the Geological Society ofAmerica 95, 295–312.Zhao, G., S. A. Wilde, and P. A. Cawood (1998). Thermal evolution ofArchean basement rocks from the eastern part of the North Chinacraton and its bearing on geologic setting. International GeologyReview 40, 706–721.Zhao, G., S. A. Wilde, P. A. Cawood, and M. Sun (2001). Archean blocksand their boundaries in the North China craton: Lithological, geochemical,structural and P-T path constraints and tectonic evolution.Precambrian Research 107, 45–73.Zhao, L., R. M. Allen, T. Zheng, and S.-H. Hung (2009). Reactivationof an Archean craton: Constraints from P- and S-wave tomographyin North China. Geophysical Research Letters 36, L17306;doi:10.1029/2009GL039781.Zheng, J., W. L. Griffin, S. Y. O’Reilly, M. Zhang, N. Pearson, and Y.Pan (2006). Widespread Archean basement beneath the Yangtzecraton. Geology 34, 417–420.Zheng, T., L. Chen, L. Zhao, W. Xu, and R. Zhu (2006). Crust-mantlestructure difference across the gravity gradient zone in NorthChina craton: Seismic image of the thinned continental crust.Physics of Earth and Planetary Interiors 159, 43–58.Zhou, D., K. Ru, and H.-Z. Chen (1995). Kinematics of Cenozoic extensionon the South China Sea continental margin and its implicationsfor the tectonic evolution of the region. Tectonophysics 251,161–177.Zhu, G., M. Niu, C. Xie, and Y. Wang (2010). Sinistral to normal faultingalong the Tan-Lu fault zone: Evidence for geodynamic switchingof the east China continental margin. Journal of Geology 118,277–293.U.S. Geological SurveyMS 966, Box 25046Lakewood, Colorado 80225 U.S.A.wheeler@usgs.govSeismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011 983
- Page 1:
Volume 82, Number 6 November/Decemb
- Page 7:
News and Notes (continued)Nominatio
- Page 11:
Preface to the Focused Issue on the
- Page 14 and 15:
TABLE 1Peak ground acceleration (PG
- Page 16 and 17:
▲▲Figure 2. A) Sketch of the
- Page 18 and 19:
▲▲Figure 4. A) Adopted moment r
- Page 20 and 21:
▲▲Figure 7. As in Figure 6 but
- Page 22 and 23:
▲ ▲ Figure 8. Misfit parameters
- Page 24 and 25:
▲ ▲ Figure 10. Spatial variabil
- Page 26 and 27:
▲ ▲ Figure 12. Standard spectra
- Page 28 and 29:
Quigley, M., R. Van Dissen, P. Vill
- Page 30 and 31:
slip on a 59-degree striking fault
- Page 32 and 33:
▲▲Figure 4. Convergence of inve
- Page 34 and 35:
observations and other source studi
- Page 36 and 37:
-42. 5-43. 0-43. 5-44. 0-44. 5-43.2
- Page 38 and 39:
“Product CSK © ASI, (ItalianSpac
- Page 40 and 41:
TABLE 2Solutions for fault location
- Page 42 and 43:
-43.45(A)degrees N-43.50-43.552.52.
- Page 44 and 45:
is still a good fit to the horizont
- Page 46 and 47:
Coulomb Stress Change Sensitivity d
- Page 48 and 49:
mation takes on a larger strike-sli
- Page 50 and 51:
P 9.4267BLDU45P 20.1213CASY39P 2.62
- Page 52 and 53:
ERMJNUMAJOINUJHJ2CBIJMIDWJOWYHNBTPU
- Page 54 and 55:
(A)6.146.13(B)6.246.36Misfit6.156.1
- Page 56 and 57:
(A)(B)(C)(D)▲▲Figure 10. The co
- Page 58 and 59:
(A)(B)(C)(D)▲▲Figure 12. The co
- Page 60 and 61:
Luo, Y., Y. Tan, S. Wei, D. Helmber
- Page 62 and 63:
−44˚00' −43˚00'4-Sep-2010Mw 7
- Page 64 and 65:
TABLE 1Pairs of SAR imagery used in
- Page 67 and 68:
Depth (km)Coulomb Stress Change(bar
- Page 69 and 70:
Crippen, R. E. (1992). Measurement
- Page 71 and 72:
AlpineFaultHope Fault38 mm/yr0+ +-1
- Page 73 and 74:
σ 1dσ 3Nuσ 3CM w 7.1dw 6.2u70°M
- Page 75 and 76:
Right-lateral Faults(A) Range Front
- Page 77 and 78:
DISCUSSIONThe 2010-2011 Canterbury
- Page 79 and 80:
Large Apparent Stresses from the Ca
- Page 81 and 82:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. Observed vs. pred
- Page 83 and 84:
10Obs SA(1s)AS1AS+SDAB 2006AB+SDSA(
- Page 85 and 86:
Fine-scale Relocation of Aftershock
- Page 87 and 88:
−43.25°OXZ0 10 20km−43.5°−4
- Page 89 and 90:
A’0 km 4 8−43.5°B’B−43.6°
- Page 91 and 92:
REFERENCESAvery, H. R., J. B. Berri
- Page 93 and 94:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. A) shows three-co
- Page 95 and 96:
▲ ▲ Figure 4. Vertical accelera
- Page 97 and 98:
0.8PRPC Z0.40Normalized (Max PGA +
- Page 99 and 100:
Near-source Strong Ground MotionsOb
- Page 101 and 102:
(A)Magnitude, M w876542009 NZdataba
- Page 103 and 104:
Scale0.5 g5 seconds▲▲Figure 4.
- Page 105 and 106:
(A)(B)Spectral Acc, Sa (g)North/Wes
- Page 107 and 108:
Vertical-to-horizontal PGA ratio543
- Page 109 and 110:
(A)(B)Station:CCCCSolid:AvgHorizDas
- Page 111 and 112:
REFERENCESAagaard, B. T., J. F. Hal
- Page 113 and 114:
▲ ▲ Figure 1. Shear-wave veloci
- Page 115 and 116:
Spectral Acceleration (0.3 s), (g)I
- Page 117 and 118:
Spectral Acceleration (3 s), (g)In[
- Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 1Mean (μ LLH ) and standard
- Page 121 and 122:
Strong Ground Motions and Damage Co
- Page 123 and 124:
ings and the Modified Takeda-Slip M
- Page 125 and 126:
high, but there were no buildings d
- Page 127 and 128:
REFERENCES▲▲Figure 8. Heavily d
- Page 129 and 130:
(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)▲▲Figure 1. A) M
- Page 131 and 132:
(A) (B) (C)▲ ▲ Figure 3. A) Typ
- Page 133 and 134:
(A) (B) (C)▲ ▲ Figure 4. A) Typ
- Page 135 and 136:
Case StudyKey ParametersTABLE 1Key
- Page 137 and 138:
▲ ▲ Figure 9. Representative bu
- Page 139 and 140:
Soil Liquefaction Effects in the Ce
- Page 141 and 142:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. Representative su
- Page 143 and 144:
Location of structures illustrated
- Page 145 and 146:
Shading indicates areaover which pr
- Page 147 and 148:
1.8 deg15 cmGround cracking due to
- Page 149 and 150:
30 cm17 cm30 cmFoundation beam▲
- Page 151 and 152:
Comparison of Liquefaction Features
- Page 153 and 154:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 2. A) Simplified
- Page 155 and 156:
(A)Acceleration (Gal)6004002000-200
- Page 157 and 158:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 7. Distribution
- Page 159 and 160:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 10. Damage to a
- Page 161 and 162:
(A)(B)▲ ▲ Figure 14. A) Subside
- Page 163 and 164:
▲▲Figure 17. A trench in a resi
- Page 165 and 166:
Ambient Noise Measurements followin
- Page 167 and 168:
▲▲Figure 1. Location of the noi
- Page 169 and 170:
▲▲Figure 5. Site N20 showing HV
- Page 171 and 172:
▲▲Figure 8. Comparison between
- Page 173 and 174:
Use of DCP and SASW Tests to Evalua
- Page 175 and 176:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. Aerial image of C
- Page 177 and 178: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 4. DCP test bein
- Page 179 and 180: ▲▲Figure 7. SASW setup at a sit
- Page 181 and 182: where X ~ N(μ X , σ X 2 ) is shor
- Page 183 and 184: Using the same critical layers as s
- Page 185 and 186: Performance of Levees (Stopbanks) d
- Page 187 and 188: ▲▲Figure 3. Typical geometry an
- Page 189 and 190: TABLE 1Damage severity categories (
- Page 191 and 192: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 6. A) Large sand
- Page 193 and 194: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 8. A) Representa
- Page 195 and 196: each of the Waimakariri River and a
- Page 197 and 198: ▲ ▲ Figure 2. Horizontal peak g
- Page 199 and 200: only minor damage, mostly to their
- Page 201 and 202: (A)(C)(B)▲▲Figure 5. Ferrymead
- Page 203 and 204: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 7. Damage to sou
- Page 205 and 206: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 11. Settlement o
- Page 207 and 208: (A)(C)(B)▲▲Figure 14. Railway B
- Page 209 and 210: Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Associ
- Page 211 and 212: New PublicationsCanGeoRefThe Americ
- Page 213 and 214: Wednesday, 18 AprilTechnical Sessio
- Page 215 and 216: Verification of a Spectral-Element
- Page 217 and 218: EASTERN SECTIONRESEARCH LETTERSReas
- Page 219 and 220: (A)70°N100°W 60°W70°N(B)100°E1
- Page 221 and 222: Mongolia SCRThe presence or absence
- Page 223 and 224: the small horizontal relative motio
- Page 225 and 226: 80°100°120°140°EXPLANATIONBorde
- Page 227: Chang, K. H. (1997). Korean peninsu
- Page 231 and 232: A significant outcome of this study
- Page 233 and 234: TABLE 1 (continued)Earthquakes for
- Page 235 and 236: ▲▲Figure 2. Earthquakes used in
- Page 237 and 238: Meeting CalendarM E E T I N GC A L
- Page 239 and 240: 201 Plaza Professional Bldg. • El
- Page 241 and 242: Seismological Research Letters (SRL
- Page 243 and 244: Christa von Hillebrandt-Andrade, Pr