12.07.2015 Views

Coverage and Liability Issues in Sexual Misconduct Claims

Coverage and Liability Issues in Sexual Misconduct Claims

Coverage and Liability Issues in Sexual Misconduct Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FLORIDAStatute of LimitationsFlorida has a four-year limitations period for personal <strong>in</strong>jury actions.Fla. Stat. Ann. §95.11(3).An action founded on alleged abuse may be commenced at any timewith<strong>in</strong> seven years after the age of majority, or with<strong>in</strong> four years afterthe <strong>in</strong>jured person leaves the dependency of the abuser, or with<strong>in</strong>four years from the time of discovery by the <strong>in</strong>jured party of boththe <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>and</strong> the causal relationship between the <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>and</strong> theabuse, whichever occurs later. Fla. Stat. Ann. §95.11(7). Neither theextended limitations period nor the cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g tort doctr<strong>in</strong>e appliedto claimant’s claims aga<strong>in</strong>st her father alleg<strong>in</strong>g sexual abuse over26 years because she knew that she had been the victim of abuse<strong>and</strong> that she suffered <strong>in</strong>jury. Tob<strong>in</strong> v. Damian, 772 So.2d 13 (Fla.App. 4th Dist. 2000). In a case alleg<strong>in</strong>g negligent hir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> retentionaga<strong>in</strong>st the church <strong>and</strong> bishop based on allegations of sexual abuseof a m<strong>in</strong>or by a priest, the court held the four-year statute applied,not the extended statute which applies only to <strong>in</strong>tentional torts basedon abuse. Doe v. Dorsey, 683 So.2d 614 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 1996),abrogated on other grounds, Malicki v. Doe, 814 So.2d 347 (Fla.2002).Report<strong>in</strong>g LawsOtherFla. Stat. Ann. §39.201 et. seq.Pastor’s sexual assault of victim was outside the scope of hisemployment with the church <strong>and</strong> thus the church was not vicariouslyliable for the acts. Elders v. United Methodist Church, 793 So. 2d1038 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 2001); Iglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor,Inc. v. L.M., 783 So.2d 353 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 2001).The First Amendment does not bar claims aga<strong>in</strong>st church, diocese <strong>and</strong>bishop alleg<strong>in</strong>g breach of fiduciary duty, negligent hir<strong>in</strong>g, supervision<strong>and</strong> retention based on pastor’s relationship with parishioner); Doe v.Evans, 814 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2002), See also Malicki v. Doe, 814 So. 2d347 (Fla. 2002); Elders v. United Methodist Church, 793 So. 2d 1038,(Fla. App. 3d Dist., 2001).– 15 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!