12.07.2015 Views

Operational Control Part 2: Special Authorizations - NBAA

Operational Control Part 2: Special Authorizations - NBAA

Operational Control Part 2: Special Authorizations - NBAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Special</strong> <strong>Authorizations</strong>–Confusion Abounds!!●●In the industryWithin the FAA3


What are we talking about? Examples:●●●MEL – Minimum Equipment Lists● § 91.213● § 135.179ETOPS – Extended Overwater Operations● § 135.364RVSM – Reduced Vertical Separation Minima● § 91.180 (domestic)● § 91.706 (international)4


<strong>Authorizations</strong> come in one of two forms:●●<strong>Part</strong> 91 – LOAs – Letters of Authorization<strong>Part</strong> 135 – OpSpecs – Operations Specifications5


Answer: Because these authorizationsmust be issued to the operator of theaircraft, i.e., the party that exercisesoperational control during the flight – notnecessarily the owner or manager of theaircraft.7


For Example – Regarding RVSM, §§ 91.180 / 91.706 statein part:“ . . . no person may operate a civil aircraft (of U.S. registry) in airspacedesignated as Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) airspaceunless:(1) The operator and the operator’s aircraft comply with therequirements of appendix G of [<strong>Part</strong> 91]; and(2) The operator is authorized by the Administrator to conductsuch operations.”8


Stated another way:● <strong>Special</strong> authorizations should be applied for by, and issued to:● Registered owners that are:● <strong>Part</strong> 91 – personal / business operators for their non-airtransportationuse● <strong>Part</strong> 135 – certificate holders for their commercial use●<strong>Part</strong>ies assuming operational control under “dry” lease or useagreements:● <strong>Part</strong> 91 operator lessees● <strong>Part</strong> 135 operator lessees● NOTE – could be multiple operators here9


Stated another way (cont.):● <strong>Special</strong> authorizations should not be applied for by, or issued to:● “Flight Department Companies”● “Non-Operating Holding Companies”● <strong>Part</strong> 91 Management Companies (“mere managementcompanies”)10


RVSM Specifically:● Huge confusion● Huge scheduling issues● Huge compliance and enforcement issuesBut, perhaps some relief in the works . . .11


Joint Industry / FAA RVSM Task Force of thePerformance-Base Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC)● Initiated largely due to <strong>NBAA</strong> requests for relief● Approximately 25 members● Broad mix of members:● FAA – various offices and levels of involvement (e.g., HQ to FSDO)● Industry – mix of operators, managers, manufacturers, consultants● Began formal work in June, 2012 – hope to complete by 2013● Initial thoughts:● No short-term rule making possible, but● Improved guidance, and● Streamlined processes where possible12


Questions?13


“Aviation in itself is not inherentlydangerous. But to an even greater degreethan the sea, it is terribly unforgiving ofany carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”David T. Norton, JD / MBA / ATPDavid T. Norton, JD / MBA / ATPShackelford, Melton & McKinley3333 Lee Parkway, 10 th FloorDallas, Texas 75219Direct: (214) 780-1407E-Fax: (214) 889-9707dnorton@shacklaw.netwww.shacklaw.netCaptain A.G. LamplughBritish Aviation Insurance Group,London, circa 193014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!