Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ... Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

library.whnlive.com
from library.whnlive.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

58Chairman Pepper. Without objection, they will be admitted.Thank you very much Doctor, for coming today.(The material referred to follows :)[Exhibit No. 5(a)]Prepared Statement of Dr. Henry Brill, Director of Pilgram StateHospital, New York, N.Y.On the feasibility of replacing natural opium products with totallysynthetic substances in medical practice.Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: I am Dr. Henry Brill ofBrentwood, N.Y., and a member of the committee on alcoholism and drug dependenceof the American Medical Association and the Committee on Problemsof Drug Dependence of the National Research Council. I am also immediate pastchairman of both committees and a member of the World Health OrganizationExpert Committee on Drug Dependence. However, my statement here today ismade in a purely personal capacity and I am not here as a representative of anygroup or organization.I believe you already have testimony to the effect that as long ago as 19ol, theCommittee on Drug Addiction and Narcotics (now the Committee on Problemsof Drug Dependence), National Academy of Science-National Research Councilwas questioned about the possibility of completely replacing natural opiumproducts with synthetic substances in the practice of medicine. The answer atthat time was a qualified affirmative and, as you know, the answer today hasbecome an unqualified aflSrmative. With this I fully concur and agree that fromthe scientific and pharmacological point of view, such a substitution is entirelypracticable.The question now before your group is different from that which was posedin 1951. That question related to a state of national emergency in which it wasassumed that stocks of opium were exhausted and irreplenishable. Today thisNation is, I believe, in a secure position with respect to such an emergency andthis improvement is to a significant degree the direct result of a major coordinatedresearch effort in which the National Academy of Medicine-National ResearchCouncil Committee played a prominent role under the leadership of Dr.Nathan Eddy who was its chairman for most of that time.You are now interested in the situation with respect to a complete substitutionin a nonemergency situation and this entails consideration of an importantfactor in addition to those considered in response to your first question and Irefer to the established patterns of medical and pharmacological practice.From all personal exi^erience, I am led to believe that the synthetics are playinga large and growing role but yet it appears that the natural opium productsand their derivatives are still extensively used in spite of the availability ofheavily advertised synthetic replacements. The U.N. publication "Statistics onNarcotic Drugs for 1969," table 5, indicates that the amount of morphine convertedinto codeine actually rose worldwide from 112,350 kilograms in 1965 to146,084 kilograms in 1969 and the corresponding U.S. figures rose from 20,089to 23,084 kilograms. The increases were irregular but the figures seem to showthat the natural products continue to play a very large role in world medicineand in the United States and that the U.S. share is significant but by no meansdecisive in the overall figures.It would thus seem that any plan to influence the drug dependence field byterminating the use of natural products would call for reorientation of thisaspect of medical practice within the United States and in other countries aswell. The issue which would have to be considered includes the relative costsof the natural and synthetic products and the relative familiarity of public andthe health professions with the many characteristics of each of the variousdrugs because in practice few drugs are entirely or e.'^sentially identical. Theytend to vary among themselves as to speed and duration of their primary actionand the relative intensity and timing of their many other properties. From allavailable information, it would seem that a replacement is technically feasiblebut it would also appear that this would call for full consultation with organizedmedicine and pharmacy. In order to be fully acceptable, such a transitionwould require further research to explore the many pharmacological characteristicsof the substitute drugs in the multiplicity of clinical situations and the

...59many conditions undef which the drugs are used and this would call for extensivelaboratory studies and clinical investigations.I appreciate the opportunity to appear before this body and realize that thereis room for much difference of opinion on all these matters but have ;;oughtto identify the problems which would seem to require solution in connectionwith the proposal which is before you. Under emergency conditions the syntheticdrugs which we now have would fully replace the natural products in controlof pain and for other indications but under nonemergency conditions it wouldseem that the immediate reorientation of medical and pharmaceutical procedures,on the scale implied in the U.N. figures, would require a major effort althoughthere are strong indications that the long-term trend lies in this direction.[Exhibit No.5(b)]Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Henry Brill, Director, Pilgrim State(N.Y.) Hospital1906 Born Bridgeport, Conn.1928 Graduate Yale College.1932 Graduate Yale Medical School.1932-34 Medical intern Pilgrim State Hospital (recognized as basisfor Nat. Board Part III).1934 Licensed New York State (28727)1938 Diplomateof National Board (by exam) (6160).1938 Qualified psychiatrist, New York State.1940 Diplomate of American Board of Neurology and Psychiatry.1951 Fellow American Psychiatric Association.1957 Certified Mental Hospital Administrator (412)1934-50 Resident, Senior Psychiatrist, Clinical Director and AssociateDirector, Pilgrim State Hospital.1950-52 Director, Craig Colony and Hospital (epilepsy)1952-59 Assistant Commissioner for Reserach and Medical Services,Department of Mental Hygiene, New York.1958-64 (Director, Pilgrim State Hospital—on leave).1959-64 Deputy and First Deputy Commissioner, N.Y. State Departmentof Mental Hygiene (Special reference to ResearchTraining and Medical Services).1964-66 Director Pilgrim State Hospital.1966-68 Vice Chairman NY State Narcotic Addiction Controlmission (Director—on leave—P.S.H.).Com-1968 to date Director Pilgrim State Hospital.teaching1955-64 Associate Clinical Professor and Clinical Professor—Psychiatry—AlbanyMedical College.1958-64 Professional lecturer—Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse.1958 to date Lecturer—Psychiatry—College of Physicians and Surgeons,Columbia University.1959 to date Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, New York School of Psychiatry.ORGANIZATIONAL1964-68Past President of American College of Neuropsychopharmacologyand of Eastern Psychiatric Research Association.Currently President-Elect American PsychopathologicalAssociation.Elected to Council of American Psychiatric Association;Council Representative to Committee on Mental HospitalStandards and Practices.EDITORIAL BOARD1948 to date Psychiatry Quarterly.1968 to date International Journal of Addictions.1969 to date Psychopharmacologia.1971 to date Comprehensive Psychiatry.

58Chairman Pepper. Without objection, they will be admitted.Thank you very much Doctor, for coming today.(The material referred to follows :)[Exhibit No. 5(a)]Prepared Statement of Dr. Henry Brill, Director of Pilgram StateHospital, New York, N.Y.On the feasibility of replacing natural opium products with totallysynthetic substances in medical practice.Mr. Chairman <strong>and</strong> Members of the Committee: I am Dr. Henry Brill ofBrentwood, N.Y., <strong>and</strong> a member of the committee on alcoholism <strong>and</strong> drug dependenceof the American Medical Association <strong>and</strong> the Committee on Problemsof Drug Dependence of the National Research Council. I am also immediate pastchairman of both committees <strong>and</strong> a member of the World Health OrganizationExpert Committee on Drug Dependence. However, my statement here today ismade in a purely personal capacity <strong>and</strong> I am not here as a representative of anygroup or organization.I believe you already have testimony to the effect that as long ago as 19ol, theCommittee on Drug Addiction <strong>and</strong> <strong>Narcotics</strong> (now the Committee on Problemsof Drug Dependence), National Academy of Science-National Research Councilwas questioned about the possibility of completely replacing natural opiumproducts with synthetic substances in the practice of medicine. The answer atthat time was a qualified affirmative <strong>and</strong>, as you know, the answer today hasbecome an unqualified aflSrmative. With this I fully concur <strong>and</strong> agree that fromthe scientific <strong>and</strong> pharmacological point of view, such a substitution is entirelypracticable.The question now before your group is different from that which was posedin 1951. That question related to a state of national emergency in which it wasassumed that stocks of opium were exhausted <strong>and</strong> irreplenishable. Today thisNation is, I believe, in a secure position with respect to such an emergency <strong>and</strong>this improvement is to a significant degree the direct result of a major coordinated<strong>research</strong> effort in which the National Academy of Medicine-National ResearchCouncil Committee played a prominent role under the leadership of Dr.Nathan Eddy who was its chairman for most of that time.You are now interested in the situation with respect to a complete substitutionin a nonemergency situation <strong>and</strong> this entails consideration of an importantfactor in addition to those considered in response to your first question <strong>and</strong> Irefer to the established patterns of medical <strong>and</strong> pharmacological practice.From all personal exi^erience, I am led to believe that the synthetics are playinga large <strong>and</strong> growing role but yet it appears that the natural opium products<strong>and</strong> their derivatives are still extensively used in spite of the availability ofheavily advertised synthetic replacements. The U.N. publication "Statistics onNarcotic Drugs for 1969," table 5, indicates that the amount of morphine convertedinto codeine actually rose worldwide from 112,350 kilograms in 1965 to146,084 kilograms in 1969 <strong>and</strong> the corresponding U.S. figures rose from 20,089to 23,084 kilograms. The increases were irregular but the figures seem to showthat the natural products continue to play a very large role in world medicine<strong>and</strong> in the United States <strong>and</strong> that the U.S. share is significant but by no meansdecisive in the overall figures.It would thus seem that any plan to influence the drug dependence field byterminating the use of natural products would call for reorientation of thisaspect of medical practice within the United States <strong>and</strong> in other countries aswell. The issue which would have to be considered includes the relative costsof the natural <strong>and</strong> synthetic products <strong>and</strong> the relative familiarity of public <strong>and</strong>the health professions with the many characteristics of each of the variousdrugs because in practice few drugs are entirely or e.'^sentially identical. Theytend to vary among themselves as to speed <strong>and</strong> duration of their primary action<strong>and</strong> the relative intensity <strong>and</strong> timing of their many other properties. From allavailable information, it would seem that a replacement is technically feasiblebut it would also appear that this would call for full consultation with organizedmedicine <strong>and</strong> pharmacy. In order to be fully acceptable, such a transitionwould require further <strong>research</strong> to explore the many pharmacological characteristicsof the substitute drugs in the multiplicity of clinical situations <strong>and</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!