Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ... Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

library.whnlive.com
from library.whnlive.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

574there should be something in the nature of a clinic? It need not belarge. It might be private as well as public. But do you agree withothers who have testified here that there needs to be not only the administrationof a drug to counteract the heroin addiction, whateverthe accepted drug may be, but in addition to that, there needs to betheiapeutic care, occupational assistance, general aid and considerationgiven to the addict ? What kind of facility do you find from your experienceto be the most desirable one for the treatment and rehabilitationof heroin addicts ?Mr. JoxES. As Dr. Chambers mentioned, Congressman Pepper, Iwould be wary of trying to isolate any one program as the most efficientor the most efficacious that we should pursue. I think the onlyrational approach has to be the one that we have followed; namely,a multimodality approach. Even with regard to methadone, which isi-eportedly the most successful to date, it speaks in terms of quiclaiessof easing the problem that we are addressing, you see. But even themost ardent supporters of the methadone approach, I think, will admitthat it is a modality that is suitable for no more than 25 or 30 percent ofthe total population, you see. So that it would be a mistake to say, well,we ought to go all out for methadone, because it simply can't be appliedsuccessfully to the bulk of people that we are addressing.The same thing would hold true for the therapeutic treatment, thetherapeutic community approach. Not all addicts, of course, will respondto that kind of modality or treatment. It is awfully difficult to tryto isolate one method and sell it to this Congress or to the administrationas the one that should be followed.Mr. Rangel. It is true. Commissioner, that most people who are unawareof wliat is going on in the drug addiction area do ask for results.But it seems to me that there should be a Federal program which woulddissiminate the results that are coming in from all of the States ratherthan having any one mimicipality or any one State ask what they aredoing with their particular addicts. But we are now listening to thisadministration declaring war on addiction and everyone is being apologetic.But on page 18 of your prepared statement, you indicate that theNational Institute of Mental Health, in setting up its recent 25-targetcity programs, did not include a single city in New York State. Well,I would like to direct my question to the liaison here and ask how canyou avoid being critical ?Mr. Hesse. With a great deal of difficulty. Congressman.I am sorry ; that is a facetious answer and I should not give it.No, we were rather upset at the guidelines which were incorporatedinto Public Law 91-211 by the Congress when it passed that bill andthe guidelines that were adopted by the National Institute of MentalHealth, because it did not give us what we thought was a meaningfulopportunity to participate and we very much hope that in the future,such opportunities will be forthcoming.We would like to see the National Institute of JNIental Health, if Imay take just a second here, implement the provision of Public Law91-513 whicli requires the Secretary of HEW to establish priorities forthe States having the more significant problems of drug abuse. To thebest of our knowledge, that has not been done. Possibly if the moneyhad been forthcoming, it would have been done. But ceitainly, if you

575are going to spend these large sums of money that are being talkedabout in the various bills, we would hope that a system of prioritieswould be worked out, not just because New York State has the largestproblem and we need a lot of money, but to address the national effortin a coordinated response with our own toward those areas having theiiighest incidence of drug abuse.Mr. Rangel. May I suggest this, that certainly, this is not a socialgathering. The Chair has made it abundantly clear that the committeeis looking for direction and certainly not attempting to embarrass anyone.It seems to me that with the great amount of money New YorkState has spent—honestly admitting that they are still searching forthe answer — your commission might be able to give some very strongsuggestions and recommendations to this committee as to how the Congresscan be more responsive to the problem of rehabilitating drugaddicts. If this includes being critical of programs that are suggested,this committee will accept it from the experts making the recommendations.So I hope that we can look forward to some very strong suggestions,not only as it relates to the needs of the people in the State ofNew York, but certainly as to the Nation as a whole.Mr. Brasco. And with respect to that problem, I wish you would•communicate with Mr. Rangel's and my ofhce, in connection with NewYork being left out as one of the 25 target areas. We should knowabout things like that.Mr. Jones. Well, the guidelines, Mr. Brasco, as presently written,seem to impose a penalty on those States in areas where programs andfacilities and services are provided. So that the more New York does,you see, the more we are likely to be excluded. This is actually what hashappened.Mr. Brasco. I appreciate that, except we would like to know about itin writing and we will see what we can do about it.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Winn ?Mr. Winn. Mr. Jones, just one quick question. Do you have any ideahow much foundation money and how much medical school money hasbeen made available for fighting the drug problems in the State ofNew York?Mr. Jones. I know we have contracts with the New York MedicalCollege. Dr. Chambers can give you more precise details.Mr. Winn. Could you give the committee just a round figure? Wehave been batting figures around.Dr. Chambers. Those are funds that we provide to the medicalschools. The medical schools do not provide funds.Mr. Winn. I am talking about foundation money that they mayhave that they are spending on their own, medical schools and foundationmoney.Dr. Chambers. I do not have that figure.Mr. Winn. Could you supply the committee with that figure ? I haveheard of several programs where foundations are supplying funds tothe medical schools for fighting drug abuse in the State of New York.Thank you, Mr. Chairman.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Keating ?Mr. Keating. I have heard a lot of talk this morning about theexpenditure of funds and I was happy to hear from the doctor withregard to behavioral sciences that he also is concerned with the quality

575are going to spend these large sums of money that are being talkedabout in the various bills, we would hope that a system of prioritieswould be worked out, not just because New York State has the largestproblem <strong>and</strong> we need a lot of money, but to address the national effortin a coordinated response with our own toward those areas having theiiighest incidence of drug abuse.Mr. Rangel. May I suggest this, that certainly, this is not a socialgathering. The Chair has made it abundantly clear that the committeeis looking for direction <strong>and</strong> certainly not attempting to embarrass anyone.It seems to me that with the great amount of money New YorkState has spent—honestly admitting that they are still searching forthe answer — your commission might be able to give some very strongsuggestions <strong>and</strong> recommendations to this committee as to how the Congresscan be more responsive to the problem of rehabilitating drugaddicts. If this includes being critical of programs that are suggested,this committee will accept it from the experts making the recommendations.So I hope that we can look forward to some very strong suggestions,not only as it relates to the needs of the people in the State ofNew York, but certainly as to the Nation as a whole.Mr. Brasco. And with respect to that problem, I wish you would•communicate with Mr. Rangel's <strong>and</strong> my ofhce, in connection with NewYork being left out as one of the 25 target areas. We should knowabout things like that.Mr. Jones. Well, the guidelines, Mr. Brasco, as presently written,seem to impose a penalty on those States in areas where programs <strong>and</strong>facilities <strong>and</strong> services are provided. So that the more New York does,you see, the more we are likely to be excluded. This is actually what hashappened.Mr. Brasco. I appreciate that, except we would like to know about itin writing <strong>and</strong> we will see what we can do about it.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Winn ?Mr. Winn. Mr. Jones, just one quick question. Do you have any ideahow much foundation money <strong>and</strong> how much medical school money hasbeen made available for fighting the drug problems in the State ofNew York?Mr. Jones. I know we have contracts with the New York MedicalCollege. Dr. Chambers can give you more precise details.Mr. Winn. Could you give the committee just a round figure? Wehave been batting figures around.Dr. Chambers. Those are funds that we provide to the medicalschools. The medical schools do not provide funds.Mr. Winn. I am talking about foundation money that they mayhave that they are spending on their own, medical schools <strong>and</strong> foundationmoney.Dr. Chambers. I do not have that figure.Mr. Winn. Could you supply the committee with that figure ? I haveheard of several programs where foundations are supplying funds tothe medical schools for fighting drug abuse in the State of New York.Thank you, Mr. Chairman.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Keating ?Mr. Keating. I have heard a lot of talk this morning about theexpenditure of funds <strong>and</strong> I was happy to hear from the doctor withregard to behavioral sciences that he also is concerned with the quality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!