Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ... Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

library.whnlive.com
from library.whnlive.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

54^creased amount of licit as well as illicit drugs in the community andmost discouraging, however, is the general failure to consider themeans of eventual withdrawal from narcotics or the complacent viewthat treating these opiate dependent individuals with legal opiates isgoing to be a life-long process.Narcotic antagonists provide a logical therapeutic and prophylacticpossibility and in the face of this need, further experimentation shouldor must be encouraged and to that end we recommend that theCongress authorize the establishment of a special study unit or commissionanalogous to the Commission on Marihuana to re^dew all theavailable data, and should this commission agree with our view of thedata, they shovild firstly stimulate the development of a long-actingformulation of an antagonist with a period of action of at least 30to 60 days; second, support the testing and development of other antagonists;and also to utilize currently available antagonists in SoutheastAsia as a prophylactic for the personnel who are daily exposed tO'heroin in tliis highly endemic area.I would think that to this end the commission should be fundedwith a sum to be determined by Congress. Probably the modestamount of $3 million shoidd suffice initially.Chairman Pepper. We thank you very much for your ablestatement.Mr. Perito, do you have any questions?Mr. Perito. Just two questions. Doctor.Assuming proper funding, how long do you think it would take tO'develop an effective long-lasting antagonistic drug?Dr. Resnick. Well, with a million dollars we could do it in a year;$3 million, in 6 months; $5 million, maybe in a month and a half.You see, we have the technical means to do this. It is merely a matterf the chemists going through the procedure of testing it out. I mean,it does not require any new, unusual discoveries. It is merely a questionof trying out different vehicles to see which one works and whatthe dangers are.Chairman Pepper. Excuse me, Doctor. This committee, I think,was among the first groups in the Congress to reconunend a commissionto study marihuana. We called on the Department of Health,Education, and Welfare to have the Surgeon General make a study,a thorough authoritative study of marihuana, some 2 years ago andlater on we supported the setting up of the Commission, and that is avery desirable procedure in many resjjects.Do you think the same job could be done in perha[)s a shorterlength of time if we provided the money to the National Institute ofMental Health, an existing agency, and gave them the j^ower to encouragethese researchers that you ai'c talking about?Dr. Resnick. Yes. I would think that if some subgrouj) within theNIMH was dedicated to this pur])ose; yes.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Mann?Mr. Mann. Doctor, your ])rograin has been conducted as a nuiinlenance-typeof program. Have you cxperiment(Hl Mith the terminationof treatment and supervision of the individual to see about a permanentcure? , ^;,ii.iDr. Resnick. Yes. We have experimented with it. There have beena number of individuals who have been on our cyclazocine program-in in ,n

S47over a period of time, from 1 to 3 years,who have then come to us andstated that they feel they have during this period of time, been free ofusing narcotics, stabihzed in their hves, do not have the need fornarcotics and would like to try ^^'ithout the use of cyclazocine.There are seven such individuals who we withdrew from cyclazocine,none of whom have become readdicted to date. There were twoindividuals who requested withdrawal from cyclazocine who shortlyafter they were off cyclazocine came back and said, "I have the urgeto use tlrugs again; please put me back on cyclazocine," and we did so.Mr. Mann. So, there is definite potential for the reordering ofone's life, perhaps, while under a sui)ervised program?Dr. Resnick. No question about that. I think the biggest hope aboutcyclazocine is that it is not addicting. The individual does not getany kick from it. There is no illicit market for it and he is not addictedto it. It is a very useful tool or crutch for him to be able to conduct hislife without heroin and hopefully to be able to reach a point where heno longer has the need to use heroin.Mr. Mann. Thank you.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Blommer?Mr. Blommer. I have no questions.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Steiger?Mr. Steiger. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.What are the side effects of cyclazocine?Dr. Resnick. The side effects of cyclazocine depend upon how fastwe give it.Mr. Steiger. What is the worst that can happen? I mean, in the4-day period.Dr. Resnick. The usual, most common side effect in the 4-dayperiod is the patient experiences what he describes as a high and helikens this to being similar to a pot high. Some of them say it is likeLSD. Most of them enjoy it. They do not find it uncomfortable orunpleasant.It is of some interest that we offer them naloxone as a means ofreducing the intensity of these side effects. Now, naloxone has thatpropoerty. So that the procedure is to tell the patient that he is goingto be built up on cyclazocine in increasing doses over 4 days and thatduring this 4-day period he will experience some side effects, none ofwhich are harmful or dangerous, that if he finds that these side effectsare too strong for him, if he wishes, he may request tablets, naloxone,which will help to reduce the intensity of these effects, and about 50percent of the patients go through the induction without usingnaloxone. The other 50 percent will use naloxone sometime duringthese 4 days and they do report after they take the naloxone, ^vithinabout a half hour to an hour the intensity of this feeling- subsides.Mr. Steiger. If there is an interruption in the administration ofcyclazocine and they get back on it in a month, after being off it amonth, do they experience this again? Would you anticipate that theywould?Dr. Resnick. If they have been off cyclazocine for a month andthen need to be reinducted on it?Mr. Steiger. Yes, sir.Dr. Resnick. Exactly the same thing happens.Mr. Steiger. Knowing the research community as you do inf thisparticular area, and also knowing the cumbersomeness of this body

54^creased amount of licit as well as illicit drugs in the community <strong>and</strong>most discouraging, however, is the general failure to consider themeans of eventual withdrawal from narcotics or the complacent viewthat treating these opiate dependent individuals with legal opiates isgoing to be a life-long process.Narcotic antagonists provide a logical therapeutic <strong>and</strong> prophylacticpossibility <strong>and</strong> in the face of this need, further experimentation shouldor must be encouraged <strong>and</strong> to that end we recommend that theCongress authorize the establishment of a special study unit or commissionanalogous to the Commission on Marihuana to re^dew all theavailable data, <strong>and</strong> should this commission agree with our view of thedata, they shovild firstly stimulate the development of a long-actingformulation of an antagonist with a period of action of at least 30to 60 days; second, support the testing <strong>and</strong> development of other antagonists;<strong>and</strong> also to utilize currently available antagonists in SoutheastAsia as a prophylactic for the personnel who are daily exposed tO'heroin in tliis highly endemic area.I would think that to this end the commission should be fundedwith a sum to be determined by Congress. Probably the modestamount of $3 million shoidd suffice initially.Chairman Pepper. We thank you very much for your ablestatement.Mr. Perito, do you have any questions?Mr. Perito. Just two questions. Doctor.Assuming proper funding, how long do you think it would take tO'develop an effective long-lasting antagonistic drug?Dr. Resnick. Well, with a million dollars we could do it in a year;$3 million, in 6 months; $5 million, maybe in a month <strong>and</strong> a half.You see, we have the technical means to do this. It is merely a matterf the chemists going through the procedure of testing it out. I mean,it does not require any new, unusual discoveries. It is merely a questionof trying out different vehicles to see which one works <strong>and</strong> whatthe dangers are.Chairman Pepper. Excuse me, Doctor. This committee, I think,was among the first groups in the Congress to reconunend a commissionto study marihuana. We called on the Department of Health,Education, <strong>and</strong> Welfare to have the Surgeon General make a study,a thorough authoritative study of marihuana, some 2 years ago <strong>and</strong>later on we supported the setting up of the Commission, <strong>and</strong> that is avery desirable procedure in many resjjects.Do you think the same job could be done in perha[)s a shorterlength of time if we provided the money to the National Institute ofMental Health, an existing agency, <strong>and</strong> gave them the j^ower to encouragethese <strong>research</strong>ers that you ai'c talking about?Dr. Resnick. Yes. I would think that if some subgrouj) within theNIMH was dedicated to this pur])ose; yes.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Mann?Mr. Mann. Doctor, your ])rograin has been conducted as a nuiinlenance-typeof program. Have you cxperiment(Hl Mith the terminationof <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>and</strong> supervision of the individual to see about a permanentcure? , ^;,ii.iDr. Resnick. Yes. We have experimented with it. There have beena number of individuals who have been on our cyclazocine program-in in ,n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!