12.07.2015 Views

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

337be satisfactory substitutes in these higher dose ranges, such doses are not recommendedin the labeling. High doses of methadone <strong>and</strong> levorphanol are oftenassociated with an appreciable incidence of tissue irritation, <strong>and</strong> their use bythe intravenous route is not recommended. Even less experience is availableconcerning the effects of high doses of such other morphine substitutes asphenazocine <strong>and</strong> anileridine.Meperidine <strong>and</strong> its congeners are superior to morphine for use in labor <strong>and</strong>delivery because their rapid onset <strong>and</strong> short duration of action minimizes therisk to the newborn infant. They are al.so often used postoperatively, as adjunctsto anesthesia <strong>and</strong> as analgesics in brief painful procedures. However, this sameproperty of rapid onset <strong>and</strong> short duration of action constitutes a liability whenthe physician wishes to treat persistent pain.As noted above, various of the synthetic morphine substitutes have limitationsin terms of a lack of knowledge concerning their effects in one or anotherof certain special patient groups such as children, women in early pregnancy<strong>and</strong> patients concurrently receiving certain other potent medications. For example,individuals being treated with monoamine-oxidase inhibitors have experiencedfatal reactions when given ordinary therapeutic doses of meperidine.This reaction does not seem to occur in such patients when morphine is used asan analgesic, <strong>and</strong> morphine is therefore the recommended potent analgesic in thisgroup of patients.With the exception of pentazocine, all of the potent synthetic narcotics havean abuse liability comparable to that of morphine. Indeed, meperidine has provenmuch more of an abuse problem than morphine in doctors, dentists, nurses <strong>and</strong>other paramedical personnel, probably because of a mistaken impression thatit is "safer" than morphine in this respect.As a <strong>research</strong> tool, morphine has been utilized as the st<strong>and</strong>ard of comparisonin virtually all of the modern controlled trials of analgesic efficacy <strong>and</strong> side effectliability involving semisynthetic <strong>and</strong> totally synthetic potent injectable analgesics.It has likewise been used at the Addiction Research Center in Lexington as thest<strong>and</strong>ard for evaluating the abuse liability of these agents. These comparativestudies form the backbone of our knowledge concerning the relative therapeuticmerits <strong>and</strong> liabilities of every single potent analgesic currently available. Thecontinuing availability of morphine as a st<strong>and</strong>ard of comparison is absolutely essentialif the quest for more effective <strong>and</strong> safer potent analgesics is to progressTinhindered.Morphine has likewise been used as the primary tool in the vast majority ofstudies of clinical <strong>and</strong> animal pharmacology aimed at elucidating the mechanismof action of narcotic analgesics <strong>and</strong> the interaction of these substances with narcoticantagonists. Morphine is so generally accepted as the prototype potentanalgesic that teaching medical students <strong>and</strong> young physicians the pharmacology<strong>and</strong>rational use of these drugs almost invariably involves presenting a detailedanalysis of the pharmacology <strong>and</strong> therpeutic properties of the prototype, morphine,followed by a briefer presentation of the ways in which the semisynthetic<strong>and</strong> totally synthetic potent analgesics differ from this prototype.In summary, while synthetics can be substituted for morphine in the majorityof patients requiring a potent analgesic, there is serious doubt as to the feasibilityof making such a substitution in a significant minority of such patients. In addition,the elimination of morphine would have a major adverse effect on the progressof our <strong>research</strong> in the fields of narcotics, analgesics, <strong>and</strong> drug dependence.CODEINELike morphine, codeine has been in therapeutic use for over one hundred years<strong>and</strong> is currently regarded as one of the basic or fundamental drugs in medicine.This agent is usually used orally <strong>and</strong> occupies a different therapeutic niche thanmorphine. Oral codeine is used in the <strong>treatment</strong> of moderate to moderately severepain <strong>and</strong> is generally considered, with the possible exception of aspirin, to be thesingle most useful mild analge.sic. Although codeine is present to a very smallextent in opium, the dem<strong>and</strong> for codeine is so great that virtually all of the availablesupply is synthesized from morphine. In addition to its use as a mild analgesiccodeine finds extensive use as an antitussive.Codeine has several properties which make it uniquely valuable among the narcoticanalgesics. The drug has excellent oral efficacy, a property not shared bymost of the other narcotics. In conjunction with this, codeine has substantially

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!