Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ... Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

library.whnlive.com
from library.whnlive.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

'222Furthermore, in our present context we are deeply concerned abouttlie intravenous use of illicit heroin. The use of methadone providesone very pragmatic possibility of knowing when patients continue touse illicit heroin. In our program, patients on methadone have theirurine tested. We know a patient is taking heroin in addition to methadone.If we weren't giving them methadone—but were giving themoral heroin—we would have no way of knowing whether they continueto take intravenous illicit heroin.Mr. Waldie. Let me ask one question. Are the results on the individualof taking methadone less debilitating than the results on theindividual of taking heroin ?Dr. Jaffe. Let me try to state this as precisely as I can.Mr. Wiggins. That is a clinical setting, right ?Mr. Waldie. Eight.Dr. Jaffe. No one. to my knowledge, has done adequate, careful,controlled studies of large doses of oral heroin. So we are alwaysforced to compare the British experience with self-administered intravenousheroin with our own experience of regular administrationof oral methadone.So the two situations are not comparable.To the best of our knowledge, intravenous heroin is not a good drugsociologically or psychologically, because the ups and downs of ashort-acting drug get people going from a "high" to a little bit "sick"and then they want to be high again. It is not a drug permitting easystabilization and functioning—the stabilization of the kind that letsciti7:ens take care of business.Methadone does permit that when used orally.Mr. Brasco. May I ask one question ? You sort of confused me as towhat was said, at least as I understood it, by Dr. Gearing yesterdaywhen we spoke about taking heroin orally.If I understand correctly. Dr. Gearing said there would be no effect.Exactly what is the effect of taking heroin orally ?Dr. Jaffe. Taking heroin orally ?Mr. Brasco. Yes ; has it the same effect that you get when you useit intravenously ?Dr. Jatte. No.Mr. Brasco. What effect does it have ?Dr. Jaffe. Well, the effect you get when you take a drug intravenously,a very short onset of action.Mr. Brasco. No ; I am talking about taking heroin orally.Dr. Jaffe. Heroin was given orally. It was used in this country untilabout 5 or 10 years ago when we ran out of old stocks for coughmedicine.Mr. Brasco. I understood her to say—and maybe I am laboringunder a misapprehension—that if you take it orally there was basicallyno effect.Dr. Jaffe. From oral heroin ?INIr. Brasco. Right ; as opposed to taking the methadone orally, youwould have the stabilizing effect and it would prevent the cra\nng forthe heroin. "When you take the heroin orally, I got the impression thatyou were sort of in the same position as not having taken it.Dr. Jaffe. Well, I think you are asking two different questions. Oneis: Is heroin as effective a drug taken orally as by injection? The

223answer is that its oral to parental ratio is not as high, meaning thatit takes a lot of heroin orally to give you a blood level so that youget an effect. That is also true of morphine. It is also true of manyof tlie standard narcotics tliat we use in medicine.If somebody really has pain, you would have to give them a shotof a drug like morphine. Methadone is one of the few drugs in thenarcotic analgesic group that has a good oral potency, meaning thatyou don't have to give a tremendous amount of it by mouth to havean effect.Mr. Brasco. As a practical matter, what would one take heroinorally for?Dr. Jaffe. The same way you take codeine, you give a littleMr. Brasco. We are talking about people addicted to drugs.Dr. Jaffe. Nobody would ever take lieroin orally if they were addicted.It is too inefficient. People sniff it, some people smoke it, butprobably nobody would swallow it, simply because it is not efficient.The body metabolizes it before it gets a chance to be active.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Waldie, have you any questions?Mr. Waldie. Just one question. Dr. Jaffe. If the Federal Governmentwere to participate in some way in this whole problem with whichyou have been involved, would you discuss, No. 1, the areas in whichyou think our participation would be most beneficial ; and No. 2, wouldyou believe in terms of priorities of expenditure, which would be thenature of our participation, that there is one portion of this programthat is more deserving of expenditure than other portions? Couldyou comment on those two areas ?, . Dr. Jaffe. WTiich program are you referring to ?Mr. Waldie. I don't know. I want you to tell me. I want to to tellme what the Federal Government, in your view, should interest themselvesin most in terms of priority or expenditures.Dr. Jaffe. Well, in the entire area you could divide it into thingslike direct support of treatment, development of research directedtoward the development of treatment and control systems, direct controlof drug availability and training ; training both for research andtreatment.Now, obviously there are some areas that you could say need priority.Our experience has been that patients who are chronic heroin userswho want treatment with methadone should be given that treatment,because it is better for them and everybody in the community, andtherefore that should be a high priority for the Federal Governmentto see that the funds are there to provide sensible, rational treatment.Now, if there are other treatment areas that can be demonstrated tobe effective for those people for whom we will say methadone is noteffective, such as young polydrug users who have not been on drugsvery long, people who just don't want to be on methadone, peoplewho want to come off methadone. In our experience many, many peoplefeel they have had their lives stabilized, they would like to comeoff. Such treatments should be provided or developed if they do notnow exist. That should be done and the Federal Government shouldsee that they provide that.There are some problems in communities. I cannot speak officiallyfor any State or community, but I do know there are certain obligatoryexpenditures they cannot get out of. I read in the paper that wlien

223answer is that its oral to parental ratio is not as high, meaning thatit takes a lot of heroin orally to give you a blood level so that youget an effect. That is also true of morphine. It is also true of manyof tlie st<strong>and</strong>ard narcotics tliat we use in medicine.If somebody really has pain, you would have to give them a shotof a drug like morphine. Methadone is one of the few drugs in thenarcotic analgesic group that has a good oral potency, meaning thatyou don't have to give a tremendous amount of it by mouth to havean effect.Mr. Brasco. As a practical matter, what would one take heroinorally for?Dr. Jaffe. The same way you take codeine, you give a littleMr. Brasco. We are talking about people addicted to drugs.Dr. Jaffe. Nobody would ever take lieroin orally if they were addicted.It is too inefficient. People sniff it, some people smoke it, butprobably nobody would swallow it, simply because it is not efficient.The body metabolizes it before it gets a chance to be active.Chairman Pepper. Mr. Waldie, have you any questions?Mr. Waldie. Just one question. Dr. Jaffe. If the Federal Governmentwere to participate in some way in this whole problem with whichyou have been involved, would you discuss, No. 1, the areas in whichyou think our participation would be most beneficial ; <strong>and</strong> No. 2, wouldyou believe in terms of priorities of expenditure, which would be thenature of our participation, that there is one portion of this programthat is more deserving of expenditure than other portions? Couldyou comment on those two areas ?, . Dr. Jaffe. WTiich program are you referring to ?Mr. Waldie. I don't know. I want you to tell me. I want to to tellme what the Federal Government, in your view, should interest themselvesin most in terms of priority or expenditures.Dr. Jaffe. Well, in the entire area you could divide it into thingslike direct support of <strong>treatment</strong>, development of <strong>research</strong> directedtoward the development of <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>and</strong> control systems, direct controlof drug availability <strong>and</strong> training ; training both for <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>treatment</strong>.Now, obviously there are some areas that you could say need priority.Our experience has been that patients who are chronic heroin userswho want <strong>treatment</strong> with methadone should be given that <strong>treatment</strong>,because it is better for them <strong>and</strong> everybody in the community, <strong>and</strong>therefore that should be a high priority for the Federal Governmentto see that the funds are there to provide sensible, rational <strong>treatment</strong>.Now, if there are other <strong>treatment</strong> areas that can be demonstrated tobe effective for those people for whom we will say methadone is noteffective, such as young polydrug users who have not been on drugsvery long, people who just don't want to be on methadone, peoplewho want to come off methadone. In our experience many, many peoplefeel they have had their lives stabilized, they would like to comeoff. Such <strong>treatment</strong>s should be provided or developed if they do notnow exist. That should be done <strong>and</strong> the Federal Government shouldsee that they provide that.There are some problems in communities. I cannot speak officiallyfor any State or community, but I do know there are certain obligatoryexpenditures they cannot get out of. I read in the paper that wlien

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!