Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ... Narcotics research, rehabilitation, and treatment. Hearings, Ninety ...

library.whnlive.com
from library.whnlive.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

124BESULTS(1) Although many of the patients test the methadone "blockade" of heroinone or more times in the first few months, less than 1 percent have returnedto regular heroin usage while under methadone maintenance treatment.(2) Antisocial behavior as measured by arrests and incarcerations (jail) havebeen looked at in several ways. First, the percentage of arrests among patientsin the program during the 3 years prior to admission was compared with the percentageof arrests of these same persons following admission. This "before andafter" picture is also contrasted with the proportion of arrests in a contrast groupof 100 men selected from the detoxification unit at Morris Bernstein Institutematched by age and ethnic group and followed in the same manner. The resultsare illustrated in figure 9. The arrest records of these two groups are quite similarfor each year of observation prior to admission. Following admission to theprogram, the contrast is striking for each period of observation with the methadonemaintenance patients showing a marked decrease in the percentage ofpatients arrested, and the contrast group showing a pattern very similar to theearlier period of observation.We have also calculated the arrests per 100 patient-years of observation for the3 years prior to admission in contrast to the arrests per 100 patient-years ofobservation after admission. We have compared these data using the same computationsfor the contrast group. The results are shown in table 5. These resultswould appear to indicate that remaining in the methadone maintenance programdoes indeed decrease antisocial behavior as measured by arrests or incarcerations.(3) Increased social productivity can best be illustrated by the employmentprofiles shown in figures 10 and 11. There is a steady and rather marked increaseii the employment rate with a corresponding decrease in the percentage ofpatients on welfare as time in the program increases. This is true both for themen and the women. These data include both ambulatory and inpatient inductiongroups. This accounts for the increased percentage of men employed at timeof admission since this was one of the early criteria for admission to an ambulatoryunit.(4) Figure 12^ is an attempt to illustrate stability of employment amongpatients remaining in the program as contrasted with their previous employmentexperience. The shaded area might be considered as a measure of their increasedsocial productivity since admission to the program.(5) Although chronic alcohol abuse continues to be a problem for approximately8 percent of the patients (both men and women), and for some becomesthe principal reason for discharge, a majority of these patients show continuedimprovement in their ability to handle their alcohol problem with the supportand assistance of members of the program staff who recognize the problem, and,are willing and able to cope with it.(6) Problems with chronic abuse of drugs such as barbiturates, amphetamines,and more recently cocaine are evident in approximately 10 percent of the patients.There again, for some, it has resulted in discharge from the program. For manyothets, the patients are able to function satisfactorily, with the assistance andsupport of members of the program staff.CONCLUSIONSOn balance, the successes in the methadone maintenance treatment programfar outweigh the failures. The rapid expansion of the program during the pastyear, and the change in emphasis to include primarily ambulatory inductionunder the expanded admission criteria does not appear to have made any noticeablechange in the effectiveness of this treatment for those heroin addicts whohave been accepted into the program. A majority of the patients have completedtheir schooling or increased their skills and have become self-supporting. Theirpattern of arrests has decreased substantially. This is in sharp contrast to theirown previous experience, as well as their current experience when compared witha matched group from the Detoxification unit, or when compared with thosepatients who have left the program. Less than 1 percent of the patients whohave remained in the program have reverted to regular heroin use.A small proportion of the patients (10 percent) persent continued evidence ofdrug abuse involving use of amphetamines, barbituarates, and cocaine, andanother 8 percent demonstrate continued problems from chronic alcohol abuse.These two problems account for the majority of failures in rehabilitatin after thefirst 6 months.

.::::;125Methadone maintenance as a treatment modality was never conceived as a"magic bullet" that would resolve all the problems of patients addicted to heroin.For this reason, we believe that any treatment program using methadone maintenancemust be prepared to provide a broad variety of supportive services todeal with problems including mixed drug abuse, chronic alcoholism, psychiatricor behavioral problems, and a variety of social and medical problems.Many questions continue to remain unanswered with reference to the role ofmethadone maintenance in the attack on the total problem of heroin addictionnevertheless the data presented on the group of patients who have been admittedto this methadone maintenance treatment program continues to demonstratethat this program has been successful in the vast majority of its patients.After a careful review of the data related to successes and failures over thepast 5 years, the methadone maintenance evaluation conmiittee has submittedthe following recommendations as of Friday, November 6, 1970KECOMMENDATIONSAs a result of the continued encouraging results in the methadone maintenancetreatment program through October 31, 1970, the methadone maintenance evaluationcommittee recommends(1) That there be continued financial support for the methadone maintenancetreatment program to allow continued intake of new patients using admissioncriteria including a minimum age of 18 years and a history of a minimumof 2 years of addiction with care in selection of patients to prevent thepossibility of addicting an individual to methadone who is not physiologicallyaddicted to heroin.(2) That there be continued evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of themethadone maintenance treatment program for the group stabilized on art inpatientbasis, the group being stabilized on an ambulatory basis, and the groupundergoing rapid induction.(3) That new programs which plan to use methadone maintenance should includeall eleemnts of the program including(c) Availability of adequate facilities for the collection of urine and laboratoryfacilities for frequent and accurate urine testing.(&) Medical and phychiatric supervision.(c) Backup hospitalization facilities.id) Adequate staff including vocational, social, and educational supportand counseling.(e) Rigid control of methods of dispensing methadone and number andsize of aoses given for self-administration in order to prevent diversion toillicit sale or possible intravenous use.(/) Staff members of potential new programs planning to use methadonemaintenance be trained in this technique in a medical center which hasbeen shown to use methadone maintenance effectively.4. That continued research is essential particularly with reference to(c) The role of methadone maintenance in the treatment of young heroinaddicts ( under 18 )(&) Developing programs using methadone maintenance in combinationwith other approaches to the treatment of heroin addiction.Projects in these areas should be supported and encouraged, but must be considerednew research studies, and should be subjected to the same surveillance,and independent evaluation as the current programs.(5) That methadone maintenance not be considered at this time as a methodof treatment suitable for use by the private medical practitioner in his officepractice, because of the requirements for other program components includingsocial rehabilitation and vocational guidance.(6) That a pilot or demonstration project be developed involving the use ofproperly trained practicing phy.sicians as an extension of an organized methadonemaintenance treatment program to treat those patients whose needs for ancillaryservices are minimal. These patients should be continued under the supervisionof the methadone maintenance treatment program for periodic evaluation andurine testing.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS1. The members of the methadone maintenance evaluation committee, both pastand present with particular reference to Dr. Henry Brill, who has so aptlychaired that committee since its inception.

124BESULTS(1) Although many of the patients test the methadone "blockade" of heroinone or more times in the first few months, less than 1 percent have returnedto regular heroin usage while under methadone maintenance <strong>treatment</strong>.(2) Antisocial behavior as measured by arrests <strong>and</strong> incarcerations (jail) havebeen looked at in several ways. First, the percentage of arrests among patientsin the program during the 3 years prior to admission was compared with the percentageof arrests of these same persons following admission. This "before <strong>and</strong>after" picture is also contrasted with the proportion of arrests in a contrast groupof 100 men selected from the detoxification unit at Morris Bernstein Institutematched by age <strong>and</strong> ethnic group <strong>and</strong> followed in the same manner. The resultsare illustrated in figure 9. The arrest records of these two groups are quite similarfor each year of observation prior to admission. Following admission to theprogram, the contrast is striking for each period of observation with the methadonemaintenance patients showing a marked decrease in the percentage ofpatients arrested, <strong>and</strong> the contrast group showing a pattern very similar to theearlier period of observation.We have also calculated the arrests per 100 patient-years of observation for the3 years prior to admission in contrast to the arrests per 100 patient-years ofobservation after admission. We have compared these data using the same computationsfor the contrast group. The results are shown in table 5. These resultswould appear to indicate that remaining in the methadone maintenance programdoes indeed decrease antisocial behavior as measured by arrests or incarcerations.(3) Increased social productivity can best be illustrated by the employmentprofiles shown in figures 10 <strong>and</strong> 11. There is a steady <strong>and</strong> rather marked increaseii the employment rate with a corresponding decrease in the percentage ofpatients on welfare as time in the program increases. This is true both for themen <strong>and</strong> the women. These data include both ambulatory <strong>and</strong> inpatient inductiongroups. This accounts for the increased percentage of men employed at timeof admission since this was one of the early criteria for admission to an ambulatoryunit.(4) Figure 12^ is an attempt to illustrate stability of employment amongpatients remaining in the program as contrasted with their previous employmentexperience. The shaded area might be considered as a measure of their increasedsocial productivity since admission to the program.(5) Although chronic alcohol abuse continues to be a problem for approximately8 percent of the patients (both men <strong>and</strong> women), <strong>and</strong> for some becomesthe principal reason for discharge, a majority of these patients show continuedimprovement in their ability to h<strong>and</strong>le their alcohol problem with the support<strong>and</strong> assistance of members of the program staff who recognize the problem, <strong>and</strong>,are willing <strong>and</strong> able to cope with it.(6) Problems with chronic abuse of drugs such as barbiturates, amphetamines,<strong>and</strong> more recently cocaine are evident in approximately 10 percent of the patients.There again, for some, it has resulted in discharge from the program. For manyothets, the patients are able to function satisfactorily, with the assistance <strong>and</strong>support of members of the program staff.CONCLUSIONSOn balance, the successes in the methadone maintenance <strong>treatment</strong> programfar outweigh the failures. The rapid expansion of the program during the pastyear, <strong>and</strong> the change in emphasis to include primarily ambulatory inductionunder the exp<strong>and</strong>ed admission criteria does not appear to have made any noticeablechange in the effectiveness of this <strong>treatment</strong> for those heroin addicts whohave been accepted into the program. A majority of the patients have completedtheir schooling or increased their skills <strong>and</strong> have become self-supporting. Theirpattern of arrests has decreased substantially. This is in sharp contrast to theirown previous experience, as well as their current experience when compared witha matched group from the Detoxification unit, or when compared with thosepatients who have left the program. Less than 1 percent of the patients whohave remained in the program have reverted to regular heroin use.A small proportion of the patients (10 percent) persent continued evidence ofdrug abuse involving use of amphetamines, barbituarates, <strong>and</strong> cocaine, <strong>and</strong>another 8 percent demonstrate continued problems from chronic alcohol abuse.These two problems account for the majority of failures in rehabilitatin after thefirst 6 months.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!