Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
33 Introduction is presented as resulting in original and singular works rather than simply reproducing a mass of replicas of limited economic value. The development of a body of knowledgeable clients is a fourth step in the process of artistic legitimation. These collectors-individuals and institutions-are intimately familiar with the product conventions that differentiate inferior items from those that display exceptional quality. They also have the economic resources necessary to commission and acquire the most exemplary products from the most skilled producers. Further. the chances of achieving artistic sanction are enhanced if the products are displayed in museums and galleries. the settings in which "real" art traditionally has been isolated from the ordinary, mass-produced. and aesthetically inferior objects of the everyday world. Finally. the creators. the medium in which they work. the production process itself. and the resultant product should be the focus of "serious"-usually academic-discussion. When the "candidate" medium comes to be the object of critical appraisal in academic conferences and influential communication organs within the art world. unique styles are differentiated. reputations are generated. evaluative conventions are refined. and inclusionary rationales are constructed. Abstracted academic discussion indicates the significance of the product (why else would academics spend time talking about it?) and helps to situate it within the legitimating boundaries that enclose artistic work (see Christopherson. 1974a, 1974b; Rosenblum. 1978; Kealy. 1979; Schwartz. 1986; Neapolitan. 1986). The contemporary art world. which has "allowed"-although not without considerable conflict-the inclusion of such non-traditional products as conceptual art (Meyer. 1972). art based on the mass-produced materials of popular culture (Amaya, 1972), computer-generated images (Prueitt, 1984), "postal" art (Fish, 1986), and Dadaist satire (Richter, 1965), is ripe for the acceptance of fine art tattOOing. Lead by an increasingly influential group of practitioners, the isolated subcultural world of tattooing is laying siege to the walls surrounding the realm of institutional art. These "creative barbarians" typically have had formal academic training in art, have
34 Introduction worked in a variety of traditional media. display astonishing levels of technical skill. and regard tattooing as a creative endeavor similar to that pursued by legitimated artistic workers. They aspire to the status and control afforded by the role of artist. They concentrate on the production of unique and expensive "pieces" for an upscale clientele that understands the relevant artistic rationales and for whom tattooing has overtly aesthetic meaning. This "new breed" of tattooist is working to expand the boundaries of tattooing by experimenting with photo-realistic portraiture. oriental traditions, "fantastic art" illustration. nonrepresentational abstractions. and other innovative stylistic approaches. Chafing under the continuing public distaste for the tattoo medium. they consistently refer to themselves as "tattoo artists" and their establishments as "studios." They take great pains to disassociate themselves from "scratchers" who are technically unskilled and "stencil men" who are incapable of doing creative custom work. The recent appearance of specialized "serious" publications dealing with tattooing is particularly important in the legitimation process. In 1982 tattooist Don Ed Hardy founded Tattoottme. a slickly illustrated annual containing scholarly articles about conventional tattoo images, innovative stylistic developments. body decoration in non-western cultures. and other issues of interest to academically inclined practitioners and enthUSiasts. Equally serious analyses of tattooing are available in Lyle Tuttle's quarterly. The Tattoo Historian. and the various publications produced by C. W. Eldridge of the Tattoo Archive in Berkeley. In turn. the larger art world has begun to take notice. Galleries and museums are now exhibiting both photographic reproductions and liVing samples of exemplary tattoo art. Mainstream publishers are marketing expensive "coffee-table" books containing full-color photos and learned discussions by accepted art critics that situate tattooing within the larger context of western art history (for example. Wroblewski. 1985; Rondinella. 1985; Richter. 1985; Thevoz. 1984). High culture periodicals now present articles on tattoo art (for example. Tucker, 1981; New Yorker. February 9. 1987: 28-31) while academicians meet to read papers about tattooing and publish proceedings (for example. Rubin. 1988) that further help to identify the practice as a legitimate
- Page 10 and 11: ix Preface to the Revised and Expan
- Page 12 and 13: xi Preface to the Revised and Expan
- Page 14 and 15: xiii Preface to the Revised and Exp
- Page 16 and 17: xv Preface to the Revised and Expan
- Page 18 and 19: xvii Preface to the Revised and Exp
- Page 20: xix Preface to the Revised and Expa
- Page 24 and 25: Preface to the First Edition xxiii
- Page 26: Preface to the First Edition xxv Pr
- Page 30 and 31: 3 Introduction duction world that r
- Page 32 and 33: 5 Introduction Body painting is anc
- Page 34 and 35: 7 Introduction erogenous zones and
- Page 36 and 37: 9 Introduction painful, it is commo
- Page 38 and 39: 11 Introduction for example, Kayan
- Page 40 and 41: 13 Introduction underworld (Richie,
- Page 42 and 43: 15 Introduction a heavily tattooed
- Page 44 and 45: 17 Introduction pain and necessitat
- Page 46 and 47: 19 Introduction were typically seen
- Page 48 and 49: 21 Introduction the corporeal chang
- Page 50 and 51: 23 Introduction ent within worlds o
- Page 52 and 53: 25 Introduction surrounding tattoo
- Page 54 and 55: 27 Introduction These dominant pers
- Page 56 and 57: 29 Introduction style. the occupati
- Page 58 and 59: 31 Introduction communicable diseas
- Page 62: 35 Introduction artistic endeavor.
- Page 65 and 66: 38 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 67 and 68: 40 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 69 and 70: 42 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 71 and 72: 44 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 73 and 74: 46 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 75: 48 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 78 and 79: 51 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 80 and 81: 53 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 82 and 83: 55 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 84 and 85: 57 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 3. The Tattoo as Social Symb
- Page 88: 61 Becoming and Being a Tattooed Pe
- Page 91 and 92: 64 The Tattooist been my safe place
- Page 93 and 94: 66 The Tattooist and psychologicall
- Page 95 and 96: 68 The Tattooist Few tattooists mak
- Page 97 and 98: 70 The Tattooist people in the busi
- Page 100 and 101: 73 The Tattooist (The tattoo artist
- Page 102 and 103: 75 The Tattooist complete tattoo. I
- Page 104 and 105: 77 The Tattooist in her kitchen. Ev
- Page 106 and 107: 79 The Tattooist reer which strongl
- Page 108 and 109: 81 The Tattooist does it hurtT "Com
34 Introduction<br />
worked in a variety of traditional media. display astonishing levels<br />
of technical skill. and regard tattooing as a creative endeavor similar<br />
to that pursued by legitimated artistic workers. They aspire to<br />
<strong>the</strong> status and control afforded by <strong>the</strong> role of artist. They concentrate<br />
on <strong>the</strong> production of unique and expensive "pieces" for an<br />
upscale clientele that understands <strong>the</strong> relevant artistic rationales<br />
and for whom tattooing has overtly aes<strong>the</strong>tic meaning. This "new<br />
breed" of tattooist is working to expand <strong>the</strong> boundaries of tattooing<br />
by experimenting with photo-realistic portraiture. oriental<br />
traditions, "fantastic art" illustration. nonrepresentational abstractions.<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r innovative stylistic approaches. Chafing under<br />
<strong>the</strong> continuing public distaste for <strong>the</strong> tattoo medium. <strong>the</strong>y<br />
consistently refer to <strong>the</strong>mselves as "tattoo artists" and <strong>the</strong>ir establishments<br />
as "studios." They take great pains to disassociate<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves from "scratchers" who are technically unskilled and<br />
"stencil men" who are incapable of doing creative custom work.<br />
The recent appearance of specialized "serious" publications<br />
dealing with tattooing is particularly important in <strong>the</strong> legitimation<br />
process. In 1982 tattooist Don Ed Hardy founded <strong>Tattoo</strong>ttme.<br />
a slickly illustrated annual containing scholarly articles about<br />
conventional tattoo images, innovative stylistic developments.<br />
body decoration in non-western cultures. and o<strong>the</strong>r issues of interest<br />
to academically inclined practitioners and enthUSiasts.<br />
Equally serious analyses of tattooing are available in Lyle Tuttle's<br />
quarterly. The <strong>Tattoo</strong> Historian. and <strong>the</strong> various publications produced<br />
by C. W. Eldridge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tattoo</strong> Archive in Berkeley.<br />
In turn. <strong>the</strong> larger art world has begun to take notice. Galleries<br />
and museums are now exhibiting both photographic reproductions<br />
and liVing samples of exemplary tattoo art. Mainstream<br />
publishers are marketing expensive "coffee-table" books containing<br />
full-color photos and learned discussions by accepted art critics<br />
that situate tattooing within <strong>the</strong> larger context of western art<br />
history (for example. Wroblewski. 1985; Rondinella. 1985; Richter.<br />
1985; Thevoz. 1984). High culture periodicals now present articles<br />
on tattoo art (for example. Tucker, 1981; New Yorker. February<br />
9. 1987: 28-31) while academicians meet to read papers<br />
about tattooing and publish proceedings (for example. Rubin.<br />
1988) that fur<strong>the</strong>r help to identify <strong>the</strong> practice as a legitimate