Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

printmytattoo.com
from printmytattoo.com More from this publisher
30.11.2012 Views

33 Introduction is presented as resulting in original and singular works rather than simply reproducing a mass of replicas of limited economic value. The development of a body of knowledgeable clients is a fourth step in the process of artistic legitimation. These collectors-individuals and institutions-are intimately familiar with the product conventions that differentiate inferior items from those that display exceptional quality. They also have the economic resources necessary to commission and acquire the most exemplary products from the most skilled producers. Further. the chances of achieving artistic sanction are enhanced if the products are displayed in museums and galleries. the settings in which "real" art traditionally has been isolated from the ordinary, mass-produced. and aesthetically inferior objects of the everyday world. Finally. the creators. the medium in which they work. the production process itself. and the resultant product should be the focus of "serious"-usually academic-discussion. When the "candidate" medium comes to be the object of critical appraisal in academic conferences and influential communication organs within the art world. unique styles are differentiated. reputations are generated. evaluative conventions are refined. and inclusionary rationales are constructed. Abstracted academic discussion indicates the significance of the product (why else would academics spend time talking about it?) and helps to situate it within the legitimating boundaries that enclose artistic work (see Christopherson. 1974a, 1974b; Rosenblum. 1978; Kealy. 1979; Schwartz. 1986; Neapolitan. 1986). The contemporary art world. which has "allowed"-although not without considerable conflict-the inclusion of such non-traditional products as conceptual art (Meyer. 1972). art based on the mass-produced materials of popular culture (Amaya, 1972), computer-generated images (Prueitt, 1984), "postal" art (Fish, 1986), and Dadaist satire (Richter, 1965), is ripe for the acceptance of fine art tattOOing. Lead by an increasingly influential group of practitioners, the isolated subcultural world of tattooing is laying siege to the walls surrounding the realm of institutional art. These "creative barbarians" typically have had formal academic training in art, have

34 Introduction worked in a variety of traditional media. display astonishing levels of technical skill. and regard tattooing as a creative endeavor similar to that pursued by legitimated artistic workers. They aspire to the status and control afforded by the role of artist. They concentrate on the production of unique and expensive "pieces" for an upscale clientele that understands the relevant artistic rationales and for whom tattooing has overtly aesthetic meaning. This "new breed" of tattooist is working to expand the boundaries of tattooing by experimenting with photo-realistic portraiture. oriental traditions, "fantastic art" illustration. nonrepresentational abstractions. and other innovative stylistic approaches. Chafing under the continuing public distaste for the tattoo medium. they consistently refer to themselves as "tattoo artists" and their establishments as "studios." They take great pains to disassociate themselves from "scratchers" who are technically unskilled and "stencil men" who are incapable of doing creative custom work. The recent appearance of specialized "serious" publications dealing with tattooing is particularly important in the legitimation process. In 1982 tattooist Don Ed Hardy founded Tattoottme. a slickly illustrated annual containing scholarly articles about conventional tattoo images, innovative stylistic developments. body decoration in non-western cultures. and other issues of interest to academically inclined practitioners and enthUSiasts. Equally serious analyses of tattooing are available in Lyle Tuttle's quarterly. The Tattoo Historian. and the various publications produced by C. W. Eldridge of the Tattoo Archive in Berkeley. In turn. the larger art world has begun to take notice. Galleries and museums are now exhibiting both photographic reproductions and liVing samples of exemplary tattoo art. Mainstream publishers are marketing expensive "coffee-table" books containing full-color photos and learned discussions by accepted art critics that situate tattooing within the larger context of western art history (for example. Wroblewski. 1985; Rondinella. 1985; Richter. 1985; Thevoz. 1984). High culture periodicals now present articles on tattoo art (for example. Tucker, 1981; New Yorker. February 9. 1987: 28-31) while academicians meet to read papers about tattooing and publish proceedings (for example. Rubin. 1988) that further help to identify the practice as a legitimate

34 Introduction<br />

worked in a variety of traditional media. display astonishing levels<br />

of technical skill. and regard tattooing as a creative endeavor similar<br />

to that pursued by legitimated artistic workers. They aspire to<br />

<strong>the</strong> status and control afforded by <strong>the</strong> role of artist. They concentrate<br />

on <strong>the</strong> production of unique and expensive "pieces" for an<br />

upscale clientele that understands <strong>the</strong> relevant artistic rationales<br />

and for whom tattooing has overtly aes<strong>the</strong>tic meaning. This "new<br />

breed" of tattooist is working to expand <strong>the</strong> boundaries of tattooing<br />

by experimenting with photo-realistic portraiture. oriental<br />

traditions, "fantastic art" illustration. nonrepresentational abstractions.<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r innovative stylistic approaches. Chafing under<br />

<strong>the</strong> continuing public distaste for <strong>the</strong> tattoo medium. <strong>the</strong>y<br />

consistently refer to <strong>the</strong>mselves as "tattoo artists" and <strong>the</strong>ir establishments<br />

as "studios." They take great pains to disassociate<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves from "scratchers" who are technically unskilled and<br />

"stencil men" who are incapable of doing creative custom work.<br />

The recent appearance of specialized "serious" publications<br />

dealing with tattooing is particularly important in <strong>the</strong> legitimation<br />

process. In 1982 tattooist Don Ed Hardy founded <strong>Tattoo</strong>ttme.<br />

a slickly illustrated annual containing scholarly articles about<br />

conventional tattoo images, innovative stylistic developments.<br />

body decoration in non-western cultures. and o<strong>the</strong>r issues of interest<br />

to academically inclined practitioners and enthUSiasts.<br />

Equally serious analyses of tattooing are available in Lyle Tuttle's<br />

quarterly. The <strong>Tattoo</strong> Historian. and <strong>the</strong> various publications produced<br />

by C. W. Eldridge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tattoo</strong> Archive in Berkeley.<br />

In turn. <strong>the</strong> larger art world has begun to take notice. Galleries<br />

and museums are now exhibiting both photographic reproductions<br />

and liVing samples of exemplary tattoo art. Mainstream<br />

publishers are marketing expensive "coffee-table" books containing<br />

full-color photos and learned discussions by accepted art critics<br />

that situate tattooing within <strong>the</strong> larger context of western art<br />

history (for example. Wroblewski. 1985; Rondinella. 1985; Richter.<br />

1985; Thevoz. 1984). High culture periodicals now present articles<br />

on tattoo art (for example. Tucker, 1981; New Yorker. February<br />

9. 1987: 28-31) while academicians meet to read papers<br />

about tattooing and publish proceedings (for example. Rubin.<br />

1988) that fur<strong>the</strong>r help to identify <strong>the</strong> practice as a legitimate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!