Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
179 Epilogue 2008 The most recent modes of body modification involve a variety of applications of plastic surgery. The most common of these is the sub-dermal implant. Implants are usually made of surgical steel or surgical grade plastics, and they are placed under the skin to augment, enhance, or change the shape of the face (most commonly) or other regions of the body. Thus, a person might implant ridges over the eyes to simulate a lizard’s brow, install in his forehead a bladder that can be filled with air to change the size and shape of the head, or implant ridges over her collar bones for decorative effect. These practices are most common among modern primitives who wish to create a “cyborg appearance” as part of a critique of modern consumer culture (see Hewitt, 1997; Pitts, 2003; and Polhemus and Randall, 1996; for extensive discussions of these practices). As the means by which people modify their bodies become more varied, people seek out newer, more radical, sometimes permanent methods of playing with their appearance and bodily structure. The most radical among these to date involve dramatic and irreversible surgical techniques. Members of the body-modification world have been known to split their penises down the center; sever, bisect, and pierce their testes; remove sections of their ears and stitch them back together so they will simulate the ears of a zebra; file their teeth into points and split their tongues so as to simulate the appearance of a lizard; and even remove finger joints or entire fingers. While these forms of body modification are available for those who are strongly inclined to physically demonstrate their alienation from conventional society, they are rare practices that are unlikely to become especially popular, at least in the near future. TATTOO SCHOLARSHIP TODAY When the first edition of Customizing the Body was published, the scholarly literature on tattooing and other forms of permanent body alterations was relatively limited. It consisted largely of a few psychological treatments of tattooing as an indicator of social pathology. As is still the case with many of the more contemporary psychological discussions of tattooing, these studies were based on studies of residents of institutions such as prisons or in-patient mental health facilities. Since data are drawn from groups who are
180 Epilogue 2008 psychologically and socially atypical, the insights and conclusions contained in these studies tend to have little relevance for understanding the phenomenon of body alteration outside of those settings. In the past few years, as general attention to and awareness of tattooing have increased, social scientists and humanists have done more research and writing directly focused on providing a general understanding and explanation of tattooing. Psychological treatments of tattooing remain concerned with explaining the connection between tattooing and psychopathology. In their study of high-school-age adolescents in Australia, Houghton and associates (1996), for example, seek to explain the “reasons, experiences, methods, and perceived health consequences of obtaining tattoos” (p. 420, emphasis added). Their results suggest a correlation between tattoos and self-reports of “school problem behavior,” although this concept is not explicitly defined in the article. The study does not discuss whether becoming tattooed precedes or comes after one is involved in problem behavior nor does it explore the teens’ motivations for acquiring tattoos. In another recent discussion of body modification, Jeffreys (2000) makes the questionable claim that cutting, tattooing, and piercing need “to be understood ...asbeing the result of, rather than resistance to, the occupation of a despised social status under male dominance” (p. 410). Given this orientation toward the function of tattooing and other modes of body modification, Jeffreys would probably have a difficult time explaining the fact that the majority of those who choose to be involved in these practices are male. Other studies that have appeared after the initial publication of Customizing the Body have described tattooing (and other forms of body modification) as “adolescent risk behaviors” (Armstrong and Pace, 1997), a form of “Russian roulette” (Ceniceros, 1998), and related to illegal drug use (Loimer and Werner, 1992). The common thread in these articles is an assumption that body modification is somehow harmful or pathological. These conclusions are, however, highly problematic since, in addition to often focusing on institutionalized populations, the authors lump together a variety of very different phenomena. For example, they fail to separate those who wear amateur or self-applied tattoos from those who wear the work of professional tattooists. These researchers also tend not to
- Page 156 and 157: 129 The Tattoo Relationship experie
- Page 158 and 159: 131 The Tattoo Relationship The reg
- Page 160 and 161: 133 The Tattoo Relationship Other p
- Page 162 and 163: 135 The Tattoo Relationship inexper
- Page 164: 137 The Tattoo Relationship the nee
- Page 167 and 168: 140 The Tattoo Relationship Followi
- Page 169 and 170: 142 The Tattoo Relationship expecte
- Page 171 and 172: 144 The Tattoo Relationship In rece
- Page 173 and 174: 146 The Tattoo Relationship tattooi
- Page 175: 148 The Tattoo Relationship the tat
- Page 178 and 179: 151 Conclusion tutional theory of a
- Page 180 and 181: 153 Conclusion arisen and learn fro
- Page 182 and 183: 155 Conclusion and give money to it
- Page 184 and 185: 157 Conclusion what are the chances
- Page 186 and 187: 159 Conclusion Works of Idea Art fr
- Page 188 and 189: 161 Conclusion the artistic redefin
- Page 190 and 191: 163 Conclusion symbolic demonstrati
- Page 192 and 193: 165 Epilogue 2008 ters, all would l
- Page 194 and 195: 167 Epilogue 2008 and the emphasis
- Page 196 and 197: 169 Epilogue 2008 The term “colle
- Page 198 and 199: 171 Epilogue 2008 design and execut
- Page 200 and 201: 173 Epilogue 2008 for three or four
- Page 202 and 203: 175 Epilogue 2008 1990s, become an
- Page 204 and 205: 177 Epilogue 2008 eyebrows and “l
- Page 208 and 209: 181 Epilogue 2008 distinguish among
- Page 210 and 211: 183 Epilogue 2008 supposedly made i
- Page 212 and 213: 185 Epilogue 2008 and perceptions o
- Page 214 and 215: 187 Epilogue 2008 become more commi
- Page 217 and 218: 190 Methodological Appendix Fairly
- Page 219 and 220: 192 Methodological Appendix laborer
- Page 221 and 222: 194 Methodological Appendix Figure
- Page 223 and 224: 196 Methodological Appendix guys wh
- Page 225 and 226: 198 Methodological Appendix increas
- Page 227 and 228: 200 Methodological Appendix because
- Page 229 and 230: 202 Methodological Appendix nomenon
- Page 231 and 232: 204 Selected Tattoo Artist Websites
- Page 233 and 234: 206 Notes to Preface to the Revised
- Page 235 and 236: 208 Notes to Chapter 2 example, “
- Page 237 and 238: 210 Notes to Chapter 2 of negative
- Page 239 and 240: 212 Notes to Chapter 4 of female cl
- Page 241 and 242: 214 Notes to Chapter 4 your mother
- Page 243 and 244: 216 Notes to Chapter 5 Chapter 5 1.
- Page 245 and 246: 218 Notes to Chapter 5 and resulted
- Page 247 and 248: 220 Notes to Epilogue 2008 only foo
- Page 249 and 250: 222 References ———. 1967. “
- Page 251 and 252: 224 References Cummings, William, a
- Page 253 and 254: 226 References Gittleson, N., G. Wa
- Page 255 and 256: 228 References Research. Hirschman,
179 Epilogue 2008<br />
The most recent modes of body modification involve a variety of<br />
applications of plastic surgery. The most common of <strong>the</strong>se is <strong>the</strong><br />
sub-dermal implant. Implants are usually made of surgical steel<br />
or surgical grade plastics, and <strong>the</strong>y are placed under <strong>the</strong> skin to<br />
augment, enhance, or change <strong>the</strong> shape of <strong>the</strong> face (most commonly)<br />
or o<strong>the</strong>r regions of <strong>the</strong> body. Thus, a person might implant<br />
ridges over <strong>the</strong> eyes to simulate a lizard’s brow, install in his forehead<br />
a bladder that can be filled with air to change <strong>the</strong> size and<br />
shape of <strong>the</strong> head, or implant ridges over her collar bones for decorative<br />
effect. These practices are most common among modern<br />
primitives who wish to create a “cyborg appearance” as part of a<br />
critique of modern consumer culture (see Hewitt, 1997; Pitts,<br />
2003; and Polhemus and Randall, 1996; for extensive discussions<br />
of <strong>the</strong>se practices).<br />
As <strong>the</strong> means by which people modify <strong>the</strong>ir bodies become more<br />
varied, people seek out newer, more radical, sometimes permanent<br />
methods of playing with <strong>the</strong>ir appearance and bodily structure.<br />
The most radical among <strong>the</strong>se to date involve dramatic and<br />
irreversible surgical techniques. Members of <strong>the</strong> body-modification<br />
world have been known to split <strong>the</strong>ir penises down <strong>the</strong><br />
center; sever, bisect, and pierce <strong>the</strong>ir testes; remove sections of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir ears and stitch <strong>the</strong>m back toge<strong>the</strong>r so <strong>the</strong>y will simulate <strong>the</strong><br />
ears of a zebra; <strong>file</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir teeth into points and split <strong>the</strong>ir tongues<br />
so as to simulate <strong>the</strong> appearance of a lizard; and even remove<br />
finger joints or entire fingers. While <strong>the</strong>se forms of body modification<br />
are available for those who are strongly inclined to physically<br />
demonstrate <strong>the</strong>ir alienation from conventional society, <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
rare practices that are unlikely to become especially popular, at<br />
least in <strong>the</strong> near future.<br />
TATTOO SCHOLARSHIP TODAY<br />
When <strong>the</strong> first edition of <strong>Customizing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Body</strong> was published,<br />
<strong>the</strong> scholarly literature on tattooing and o<strong>the</strong>r forms of permanent<br />
body alterations was relatively limited. It consisted largely of a few<br />
psychological treatments of tattooing as an indicator of social<br />
pathology. As is still <strong>the</strong> case with many of <strong>the</strong> more contemporary<br />
psychological discussions of tattooing, <strong>the</strong>se studies were based<br />
on studies of residents of institutions such as prisons or in-patient<br />
mental health facilities. Since data are drawn from groups who are