30.11.2012 Views

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

161 Conclusion<br />

<strong>the</strong> artistic redefinition of those cultural materials. To <strong>the</strong> extent<br />

that a similar process of diffusion continues. gains momentum.<br />

and draws fur<strong>the</strong>r attention. <strong>the</strong> likelihood that tattooing will<br />

achieve some measure of legitimacy as an artistic phenomenon<br />

appears ra<strong>the</strong>r good (see DiMaggio. 1987: 447-448). Fur<strong>the</strong>r. as<br />

major tattooists continue to explore new forms of stylistic innovation-especially<br />

as <strong>the</strong>y incorporate styles that have flourished in<br />

<strong>the</strong> conventional art world (for example. primitivism, photorealism.<br />

abstraction. minimalism)-influential representatives of<br />

<strong>the</strong> art establishment can be expected to pay more sympa<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

attention. <strong>the</strong>reby increasing <strong>the</strong> prospect of redefinition and artistic<br />

legitimation (DiMaggio. 1987: 449, 452).<br />

The recent history of graffiti-as-art offers a particularly relevant<br />

example. In <strong>the</strong> 1970s graffiti made a minor incursion into <strong>the</strong><br />

established fine art world. Like tattOOing, graffiti is a mode of cultural<br />

production connected to marginal and disvalued social<br />

groups-principally poor. minority. urban males. Fur<strong>the</strong>r. it functions.<br />

like tattOOing, as a "disenfranchised gesture" symboliZing<br />

territorial boundaries. group membership, personal identity, and<br />

protest against <strong>the</strong> control exercised by <strong>the</strong> social establishment<br />

(Klofas and Cutshall, 1985; Castleman. 1982: 26-31; Pearlstein.<br />

1978). Largely through <strong>the</strong> efforts of sympa<strong>the</strong>tic academics, graffiti<br />

"writers" in New York were brought toge<strong>the</strong>r to form organizations<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> United Graffiti Artists (UGA) and <strong>the</strong> Nation<br />

of Graffiti Artists (NOGA) (Castleman, 1982: 117-133). In turn.<br />

<strong>the</strong>se academically connected sponsors used <strong>the</strong>ir establishment<br />

associations to move <strong>the</strong> work of organization members off <strong>the</strong><br />

streets and into legitimating academic. marketing. and display<br />

settings. 8<br />

Drawn by <strong>the</strong> nascent artistic legitimation of graffiti, <strong>the</strong> media.<br />

which preViously had strongly condemned <strong>the</strong> practice as criminal<br />

vandalism. began to praise graffiti for its Vitality and<br />

exuberance. 9 Although intense social control activities by governmental<br />

organizations effectively truncated <strong>the</strong> creative work done<br />

by <strong>the</strong> original artists in <strong>the</strong> original public environments (see<br />

Castleman. 1982: 134-175), established artists enthusiastically<br />

coopted <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes and stylistic features of graffiti. In <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1970s curator Rolando Castellon mounted an exhibit entitled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!