30.11.2012 Views

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 Conclusion<br />

ular cultural <strong>the</strong>mes and objects intrude upon <strong>the</strong> art world only<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y are removed from <strong>the</strong>ir intended commercial context<br />

and used as icons by "acknowledged" artists.<br />

The chances that products of certain activities will be labeled as<br />

art are fur<strong>the</strong>r enhanced if <strong>the</strong> materials display attributes that<br />

have come to be conventionally defined as indicating aes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

worth. In general, this means that <strong>the</strong> candidate object has no<br />

overt utilitarian purpose and is presented as a focus of attention<br />

simply for <strong>the</strong> sake of <strong>the</strong> pleasurable experience derived from<br />

that attention (see Holbrook and Moore, 1981; Dickie, 1971; Wallendorf<br />

et aI., 1981; Becker, 1982: 131-145).<br />

The apparent amount of labor and technical skill that went<br />

into <strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> object is related to <strong>the</strong> defined aes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

value of that object (MukeIji, 1978: 352). If anyone, no matter<br />

what <strong>the</strong>ir level of ability and experience, can make something in<br />

a relatively brief period of time, it is less likely that it will be labeled<br />

with <strong>the</strong> honorific title ofart than if <strong>the</strong> object overtly exhibits<br />

skill, knowledge, and a degree of toil. Articles that do not<br />

represent any particular amount of skilled labor; are overtly<br />

sloppy, ill-conceived, or ugly; and are mechanically reproduced as<br />

commodities for mass consumption ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a source of<br />

aes<strong>the</strong>tic enjoyment suffer a severe definitional handicap.<br />

A product's chances ofbeing defined as art are also related to <strong>the</strong><br />

kinds of materials employed and <strong>the</strong> procedures creators pursue<br />

in <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> production process. Objects made from conventional<br />

materials such as paint, canvas, marble, or clay through<br />

<strong>the</strong> conventional use of conventional eqUipment-brushes, pens,<br />

pottery wheels, and so forth-enjoy legitimational advantages.<br />

When, however, products are made through <strong>the</strong> use of unconventional<br />

resources and procedures, chances of institutional acceptance<br />

are greatly reduced (see Becker, 1982: 57-59; cf. Lyon, 1974).<br />

The amount of serious, typically academic, attention devoted<br />

to an object or actiVity also affects its chances of artistic certification.<br />

Products and production enterprises derive importance from<br />

being <strong>the</strong> focus of abstracted, critical, <strong>the</strong>oretically oriented discussion.<br />

Universities are major sources of institutional legitimation.<br />

When students in programs specifically devoted to art learn<br />

about <strong>the</strong> historical context in which a productive actiVity has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!