Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
152 Conclusion<br />
ular cultural <strong>the</strong>mes and objects intrude upon <strong>the</strong> art world only<br />
when <strong>the</strong>y are removed from <strong>the</strong>ir intended commercial context<br />
and used as icons by "acknowledged" artists.<br />
The chances that products of certain activities will be labeled as<br />
art are fur<strong>the</strong>r enhanced if <strong>the</strong> materials display attributes that<br />
have come to be conventionally defined as indicating aes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />
worth. In general, this means that <strong>the</strong> candidate object has no<br />
overt utilitarian purpose and is presented as a focus of attention<br />
simply for <strong>the</strong> sake of <strong>the</strong> pleasurable experience derived from<br />
that attention (see Holbrook and Moore, 1981; Dickie, 1971; Wallendorf<br />
et aI., 1981; Becker, 1982: 131-145).<br />
The apparent amount of labor and technical skill that went<br />
into <strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> object is related to <strong>the</strong> defined aes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />
value of that object (MukeIji, 1978: 352). If anyone, no matter<br />
what <strong>the</strong>ir level of ability and experience, can make something in<br />
a relatively brief period of time, it is less likely that it will be labeled<br />
with <strong>the</strong> honorific title ofart than if <strong>the</strong> object overtly exhibits<br />
skill, knowledge, and a degree of toil. Articles that do not<br />
represent any particular amount of skilled labor; are overtly<br />
sloppy, ill-conceived, or ugly; and are mechanically reproduced as<br />
commodities for mass consumption ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a source of<br />
aes<strong>the</strong>tic enjoyment suffer a severe definitional handicap.<br />
A product's chances ofbeing defined as art are also related to <strong>the</strong><br />
kinds of materials employed and <strong>the</strong> procedures creators pursue<br />
in <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> production process. Objects made from conventional<br />
materials such as paint, canvas, marble, or clay through<br />
<strong>the</strong> conventional use of conventional eqUipment-brushes, pens,<br />
pottery wheels, and so forth-enjoy legitimational advantages.<br />
When, however, products are made through <strong>the</strong> use of unconventional<br />
resources and procedures, chances of institutional acceptance<br />
are greatly reduced (see Becker, 1982: 57-59; cf. Lyon, 1974).<br />
The amount of serious, typically academic, attention devoted<br />
to an object or actiVity also affects its chances of artistic certification.<br />
Products and production enterprises derive importance from<br />
being <strong>the</strong> focus of abstracted, critical, <strong>the</strong>oretically oriented discussion.<br />
Universities are major sources of institutional legitimation.<br />
When students in programs specifically devoted to art learn<br />
about <strong>the</strong> historical context in which a productive actiVity has