Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
151 Conclusion<br />
tutional <strong>the</strong>ory of art revolves is: What factors increase <strong>the</strong> likelihood<br />
that an activity or object will be consensually labeled as art<br />
and. conversely. what characteristics impede this process of artistic<br />
definition?<br />
Art works exist within an historical and cross-cultural context<br />
(Dickie. 1971: 101). Creative practices that have identifiable historical<br />
and cultural roots-which can be connected to a tradition<br />
that notes stylistic precedents. charts <strong>the</strong> development of defined<br />
value and identifies exemplary practitioners and artifacts-are excellent<br />
candidates for artistic legitimation. As Janson (1964: 15)<br />
observes:<br />
Every work of art occupies its own specific place ... which we<br />
call tradition. Without tradition-<strong>the</strong> word means "that which<br />
has been handed down to us"-no originality would be<br />
possible; it prOVides. as it were. <strong>the</strong> firm platform from which<br />
<strong>the</strong> artist makes his leap of <strong>the</strong> imagination. The place where<br />
he lands will <strong>the</strong>n become part of <strong>the</strong> web and serve as a point<br />
of departure for fur<strong>the</strong>r leaps.... Tradition is <strong>the</strong> framework<br />
within which we inevitably form our opinions of works of art<br />
and assess <strong>the</strong>ir degree of originality (cf.• MukeIji. 1978: 351;<br />
Manfredi. 1982: 120-148).<br />
On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand. production activities that cannot be connected<br />
to historical or cultural precedent or that have little or no<br />
demonstrable foundation in accepted <strong>the</strong>oretical or technical development<br />
are unlikely to achieve institutional certification.<br />
Within <strong>the</strong> conventional boundaries imposed by historical and<br />
cultural tradition. objects that are unique. original. and. consequently.<br />
scarce and expenSive are prime candidates for artistic<br />
legitimation. Originality is <strong>the</strong> conventional hallmark of artistry<br />
(Janson. 1964: 12; Dickie. 1974: 47-48). Cultural items that are<br />
mechanically reproduced. widely available. inexpensive. and overtly<br />
designed as commodities for mass consumption are. by definition.<br />
excluded from <strong>the</strong> category of "real" art. While <strong>the</strong>re is often<br />
an interesting cross-fertiliZing connection between popular cultural<br />
materials and so-called "high" art (see Crane. 1987; Nye. 1972;<br />
Gans. 1974; Browne. 1983; Hirschman. 1981). <strong>the</strong> overt consumer<br />
focus and highly formulaic character of popular culture makes<br />
<strong>the</strong>se materials unlikely candidates for artistic certification. Pop-