Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Customizing the Body (PDF file) - Print My Tattoo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 The <strong>Tattoo</strong>ist<br />
<strong>Tattoo</strong>ists also have problems with <strong>the</strong> organization of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
worklife. especially <strong>the</strong> time and energy constraints and <strong>the</strong> boredom<br />
that results from routine maintenance activities and <strong>the</strong><br />
clients who request <strong>the</strong> same few conventional images with<br />
numbing regularity. Finally. tattooists experience a problem that<br />
is central to all service work. They find <strong>the</strong> dally process of relating<br />
to and exerting control over <strong>the</strong>ir cl1entele to be continuously<br />
problematic.<br />
Problems of Occupational Stigma<br />
<strong>Tattoo</strong>ing continues to carry <strong>the</strong> disreputable reputation acqUired<br />
early in its history. As discussed in <strong>the</strong> first chapter. this<br />
image of disrepute was derived from <strong>the</strong> low status of <strong>the</strong> social<br />
segments from which early western tattooists typically drew <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
cl1ents. The general publ1c saw. and continues to see. <strong>the</strong> tattoo<br />
establ1shment as patronized largely by criminals. marginal laborers.<br />
drug abusers. members of motorcycle gangs. prostitutes. and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r disvalued social types (Richie and Buruma. 1980: 11-33;<br />
Scutt and Gotch. 1974: 108-119. 179-184; Sanders. 1987). In<br />
short. tattooing is publ1cly defined as a tarnished occupational<br />
activity involving <strong>the</strong> creation of a service/product that symbol1zes<br />
<strong>the</strong> "blemished character" of its cl1entele (Shover. 1975).<br />
The negative image of tattooing also comes from its "dirty work"<br />
features (Hughes. 1971a). The tattooist routinely induces pain.<br />
handles <strong>the</strong> nude bodies of strangers. and is stained with blood<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r body flUids. He or she is. however. not insulated from<br />
<strong>the</strong> stigma of unclean work by a medical degree. membership in a<br />
publ1cly legitimated professional association. or <strong>the</strong> assistance<br />
of a coterie of underl1ngs who perform <strong>the</strong> most unsavory service<br />
activities.<br />
The establ1shed tattooists interviewed14 did not see <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
as being responsible for <strong>the</strong> continued negative publ1c image of<br />
tattOOing. Instead. <strong>the</strong>y focused blame on <strong>the</strong> most marginal<br />
members of <strong>the</strong> occupation. <strong>Tattoo</strong>ing eqUipment was too cheap<br />
and avallable and any indiViduals. no matter how untalented or<br />
inexperienced. could call <strong>the</strong>mselves tattooists and begin "marking<br />
people up." Driven largely by greed and feel1ng no concern<br />
for <strong>the</strong> publ1c reputation of tattOOing. <strong>the</strong>se "bootleggers" or