30.11.2012 Views

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

your mind? I certainly think of picketing, organizing<br />

advocacy networks, writing letters to decisionmakers<br />

and media, making phone calls, holding<br />

town halls perhaps, and so on. I wonder if we<br />

couldn’t use more of our God-given creativity to<br />

increase our menu of options. For instance, the<br />

congregation I serve is full of business leaders. (At<br />

board meetings I sometimes think we have too many<br />

of them!) What are ways we can include and<br />

encourage business leaders to be advocates and<br />

people of justice in their work lives? Too often those<br />

with resources are preached at or scolded. We<br />

perpetuate the “money is bad” fiction.<br />

I just accepted an invitation to speak on a panel this<br />

fall about how businesses can create positive social<br />

change. Over the last couple weeks, during my<br />

discussions about the panel with the organizers, at<br />

least two of their impressions have become clear:<br />

First, they perceive religious leaders as ignorant<br />

about the realities of social dilemmas, including<br />

poverty; second, they perceive us as those who talk a<br />

good game about social change, but rarely act to<br />

actually change anything at all—in society or in our<br />

churches. Whether or not we agree with these<br />

perceptions is secondary so as long the perceptions<br />

exist. And it certainly seems to be the case, from my<br />

view, that the most productive social change work<br />

right now is led by social entrepreneurs and<br />

philanthropists. Often they are doing the systemic<br />

change we are talking about. Now is the time for us<br />

to connect more deeply.<br />

I’ll just touch on this one: I’m not sure that<br />

Christian unity and church unity mean the same<br />

thing. In fact, I would argue that many people of<br />

faith—Christian and other faiths—are uniting<br />

precisely around issues of justice and prophetic<br />

witness. Many times this work happens independent<br />

of ecclesial structures. Are those structures<br />

slowing ecumenical progress? To ask it another way,<br />

is the unity and renewal of the church essential for<br />

its witness? Or, can the witness progress just fine,<br />

thank you very much, without being hampered by<br />

concerns of unity in any formalized sense? Who or<br />

what benefits from a more united church? When<br />

Jesus was asked about finding God’s kingdom, he<br />

suggested taking some action or changing some<br />

behavior. Never is it recorded that he said, “Form<br />

the right set of doctrines.” How, if at all, does this<br />

speak to us about unity and witness?<br />

I wonder if another communication hurdle we face<br />

is due to the difficulty of measuring effectiveness in<br />

Wilson • Christian Unity and Prophetic Witness<br />

36<br />

church life. Whether it’s the seminarians to whom I<br />

referred earlier, or congregational clergy, or<br />

judicatory leaders, or laity, I think part of our<br />

problem stems from the difficulty of proving that<br />

resources used on matters of furthering unity or<br />

witness are producing desired results. They might<br />

respond with that old joke about the man who went<br />

to his boss and said, “Boss, when’s that pay raise of<br />

mine going to be made effective?” Boss said, “As<br />

soon as you are.” Measuring things in the church is<br />

not easy, is it? Maybe that’s why we fall back on<br />

counting noses and nickels. At least those are two<br />

things we can count: what’s the attendance; what’s<br />

the offering? Surely we can brainstorm ways to<br />

prove the value of unity and witness.<br />

They perceive us as those who talk<br />

a good game about social change,<br />

but rarely act to actually change anything<br />

at all—in society or in our churches.<br />

I want to conclude with a problem I have. You don’t<br />

have enough time for many of my problems, so I’ll<br />

just name one. I’ll call it the “Mark” problem. Mark<br />

sang at the church I serve last fall. Mark’s special<br />

music was just after my message in the worship<br />

celebration, so he had no choice but to listen to the<br />

message! The following Thursday, Mark stopped by<br />

church just as I finished a class I teach about<br />

forgiveness. We didn’t have an appointment<br />

scheduled, so my assistant buzzed me to see how I<br />

wanted her to handle it. I decided to meet with<br />

Mark, so he came to my office and we talked. For the<br />

first 30 minutes, there was nothing terribly<br />

remarkable in our conversation. He asked some<br />

questions about our order of worship, about why we<br />

celebrate the Eucharist every week and about how we<br />

mix genres of music.<br />

Then he said, in what I first thought was his parting<br />

statement, “Well, I just wanted to stop by and say I<br />

thought your sermon was kind of, okay.” I laughed<br />

and said that’s what all of us preachers strive for:<br />

“Kind of okay” sermons! Immediately Mark<br />

launched into conversation with new vigor. He said<br />

that for him a “kind of okay” sermon was good. He<br />

said he never felt comfortable in a church, and that<br />

the only reason he sang in churches was to earn extra<br />

money with generally pretty minimal expectations.<br />

We talked about the openness of our congregation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!