30.11.2012 Views

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

himself, excluding and excommunicating a part of<br />

himself.” 3<br />

We take this seriously. When Disciples attend a<br />

church service in which there is no observance of the<br />

Supper, or in which participation in the Supper is<br />

limited to a select few, we can often hear the<br />

comment made: “I don’t even feel like I’ve been to<br />

church.” Quite frankly, still in the feeling mode,<br />

when we are denied access to the Table, we begin<br />

touching deep-seated notes of anger.<br />

And that reality might help us to understand how we<br />

began two hundred years ago. So let us remember<br />

that Barton Stone found himself in difficulty with<br />

his Presbyterian denominational power structure<br />

because of his radical freedom of thought, and his<br />

practice of an “open” Table. Thomas Campbell was<br />

called to task in part because he committed the sin<br />

of offering the Lord’s Supper to people who were a<br />

part of the main body of Presbyterians, not just his<br />

Seceder Presbyterians. Alexander Campbell found<br />

himself compelled to walk out of a communion<br />

service in his (and his father’s) denomination, the<br />

Anti-Burger, Seceder, Old Light Presbyterians<br />

because of the barriers put up between the people<br />

and the Table.<br />

The birth of the Disciples thus began around<br />

issues of the Table, particularly the belief that the<br />

Table belonged to the Christ, and to all who<br />

followed him.<br />

That’s where we came from. And now, two centuries<br />

later, and two hundred years down the road of the<br />

ecumenical movement, we still find the Christian<br />

community divided most obviously and painfully<br />

when we come to the Table. For theological and<br />

historical reasons, we are not permitted to share at<br />

the Table with many of our sisters and brothers in<br />

the faith. This break in fellowship can never be<br />

acceptable, and must be seen for what it is: sin<br />

against the very heart of the church.<br />

And now, two centuries later, and two<br />

hundred years down the road of the<br />

ecumenical movement, we still find the<br />

Christian community divided most obviously<br />

and painfully when we come to the Table.<br />

In the years to come, the Disciples are in a position<br />

to be advocates for the unity of the faith particularly<br />

as we accept the invitation to come to the Table. And<br />

13<br />

we can never be satisfied with the “way things are”<br />

when worship services include Holy Communion<br />

for some, but not all. Or worse, worship services<br />

which omit the Supper because of its “difficulties.”<br />

And if we come to the Table of our Lord together,<br />

then By God we had best treat other Christians,<br />

other human beings with love and concern, as<br />

family. If we truly are called by our Lord to the Holy<br />

Table, then we must also work to make sure that no<br />

barriers keep us apart. The barriers of nationalism,<br />

race, economic status, gender, sexual orientation,<br />

even creed, none of these can be allowed to stand<br />

between us and the Eucharistic feast.<br />

The ecumenical movement has a future only if we<br />

accept God’s gift of unity, and work to manifest that<br />

unity amongst all the peoples. As Thomas Campbell<br />

proclaimed in his magisterial Declaration and<br />

Address, God speaking through Jesus said that<br />

wholeness, unity among the followers of Christ is<br />

God’s express will that “they may all be one. As you<br />

God, are in me and I am in you, may they also be in<br />

us, so that the world may believe that you have sent<br />

me.” (John 17:20-21, NRSV) To accede to a divided<br />

church, a divided Table, is sin, sin that separates us<br />

not only from one another but also from the Christ<br />

himself.<br />

Within the community of faith it is not only<br />

possible, it is likely that there will be differences of<br />

opinion on matters of ethics, and theology, even<br />

over the Supper itself. However, when we permit the<br />

gentle nudging of the Spirit to operate among us,<br />

we will find ourselves led to places of power and<br />

reconciliation.<br />

If we are to be a part of God’s united church, we<br />

must allow the Spirit’s power of forgiveness and<br />

tolerance to live with us, within us, rushing over us<br />

so that no opinion can overcome the unity with<br />

which we have been blessed, unity that brings us<br />

together at the Table of reconciliation and peace.<br />

This will require humility of the first order. And we<br />

will be called upon to live a tenderness and<br />

generosity of affection for and with each other, even<br />

as we experience such tenderness and affection with<br />

those beside us and across from us at the sacred<br />

Table.<br />

There are many points of division within the church<br />

today, and if we are seriously engaged in seeking to<br />

live the unity of the church which God lays before<br />

us, we will have some profoundly difficult moments.<br />

If we think that we have the ability to overcome the<br />

Harrison • The Lord’s Supper and Our Vision of Christian Unity Today

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!