12.07.2015 Views

2006-07 deer Report - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

2006-07 deer Report - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

2006-07 deer Report - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section Five: Focus on Deer – Rick Evans Gr<strong>and</strong>view Prairie WMAon one side to prevent harvest of young bucks. Doeharvest goals were set at an aggressive rate of oneper 50 acres with no more than 80. An archeryonly hunt was chosen because it would providemaximum safety, optimum hunting opportunitywithout overcrowding, <strong>and</strong> maintain the <strong>deer</strong>herd’s current age class structure. Forty permitsare available (one per 100 acres) so hunters haveample space for a high-quality experience. Initiallypermits were divided equally between two seasons.The buck quota was set at four. The doe quota wasset at two per hunter. Harvest regulations werechanged after a few years of hunter comments,staff review, the four buck quota being reachedearly, <strong>and</strong> hunters not harvesting enough does. Thesplit seasons <strong>and</strong> permits were combined, <strong>and</strong> anadditional regulation requiring a hunter to harvest adoe before entering the buck quota hunt was added.Does taken on Gr<strong>and</strong>view would not count towarda hunter’s bag limit. The buck quota was increasedto six.Population TrendMonitoring MethodsFive methods are used to indicate populationtrends – spotlight counts, camera surveys, hunterobservation data, herd health data <strong>and</strong> biologicaldata from harvested <strong>deer</strong>.1. Spotlight Counts – Spotlight counts wereused as an index for <strong>deer</strong> density, fawn-to-doeratios, <strong>and</strong> buck-to-doe ratios for 1997 <strong>and</strong>1998. Routes were set up over 15 miles throughthe entire WMA <strong>and</strong> ran on five consecutivenights for the two years. Deer were counted,identified according to sex, <strong>and</strong> total routeacreage was recorded. A total of 589 acres weresampled <strong>and</strong> an average of one <strong>deer</strong> per 12acres was indicated. The counts also found thebuck-to-doe <strong>and</strong> fawn-to-doe ratios to be 1:2.5<strong>and</strong> 1:6, respectively.2. Camera Survey – A trail camera survey wasused as a pilot study to indicate <strong>deer</strong> density,buck-to-doe ratios, <strong>and</strong> fawn-to-doe ratiosfor 2002. Trail cameras were set up fromGr<strong>and</strong>view Prairie Hunter Observation Data 1998-2003YearNumberof HuntersHours ofObservationBucks Does Fawns Unknown Total Deer1998 12 301 47 94 N/A 11 1521999 16 702 142 297 67 61 5672000 18 14<strong>07</strong> 199 276 79 64 6182001 20 1100 88 129 40 38 2952002 19 1502 184 329 102 72 6872003 26 1843 179 131 37 50 39731

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!