violence against children WORLD REPORT ON - CRIN

violence against children WORLD REPORT ON - CRIN violence against children WORLD REPORT ON - CRIN

12.07.2015 Views

3shoe, wooden spoon, etc. But it can also involve,for example, kicking, shaking or throwingchildren, scratching, pinching, biting, pullinghair or boxing ears, forcing children to stay inuncomfortable positions, burning, scalding orforced ingestion (for example, washing children’smouths out with soap or forcing themto swallow hot spices). The Committee comments:“In the view of the Committee, corporalpunishment is invariably degrading. Inaddition, there are other non-physical forms ofpunishment which are also cruel and degradingand thus incompatible with the CRC. Theseinclude, for example, punishment which belittles,humiliates, denigrates, scapegoats, threatens,scares or ridicules the child.” 35There are considerable variations in popularviews about the use and effectiveness ofcorporal punishment, according to availablestudies. While a Canadian study found that59% of people believed that spanking is harmfuland 86% that it is ineffective, 36 researchin the USA found that 84% agreed “that itis sometimes necessary to discipline a childwith a good hard spanking.” 37,38 A study in theRepublic of Korea found that 90% of parentsthought corporal punishment ‘necessary’. 39 Ina report from Yemen, almost 90% of childrensaid that physical and humiliating punishmentis the main method of discipline in the family,with the most common form being beating. 40What children think about corporal punishmentThe Save the Children Alliance conducted research on physical and humiliating punishmentwith children around the world as a special contribution to the Study. Theresulting report found that overwhelmingly, the children disagreed with the idea thatsuch punishment accomplished anything positive. The report suggested that whilechildren may comply with adults’ wishes immediately after being hit, “young childrenfrequently do not remember why they are hit, and children will only refrain from themisbehaviour if they face an imminent threat of being hit. This sort of punishmentfrightens children into certain behaviours: it does not help children to want to behave,or teach them self-discipline or promote any alternative.” 41 In a survey undertaken byUNICEF in Europe and Central Asia, over 75% of children said that ‘hitting’ was‘never’ a good solution to problems at home. 42 In Regional Consultations for the Study,children repeatedly called for other methods of discipline, including being offered aproper explanation of what they had done wrong. They underlined how hurtful it wasto be hit and humiliated by those who professed to love and care for them.53Violence against children in the home and family

54Violence against children in the home and familyNeglectNeglect is an important contributor to deathand illness in young children. Neglect meansthe failure of parents or carers to meet a child’sphysical and emotional needs when they havethe means, knowledge and access to servicesto do so; or failure to protect her or him fromexposure to danger. However, in many settingsthe line between what is caused deliberatelyand what is caused by ignorance or lackof care possibilities may be difficult to draw.The degree to which neglect influences childmortality rates in many parts of the worldis unknown (with exceptions, including the‘missing girls’ phenomenon; see below).Cases of neglect are difficult to interpret in circumstancesof poor public health and undernutrition.In some industrialised countries,neglect constitutes the largest proportion of childmaltreatment cases reported to the authorities.Studies in these countries confirm that forms ofviolence and neglect interconnect. 43 All of theRegional Consultations for the Study expressedconcern about neglect of children with disabilities;although there is little quantitativeevidence, it is known that these children are athigh risk of neglect, from deliberate withholdingof basic physical necessities to emotionalisolation and lack of stimulation.Research on sex differences in neglect inIndia suggests that girls suffer relatively moreneglect than boys throughout early childhood.They are breast-fed less frequently thanboys and for shorter duration; once weaned,they are given food of an inferior quality andquantity. 44 Girls are also taken to health servicesless often, and later in the course of anyillness. 45 A study from Nepal into outcomes ofpolio infection in the population found thatseveral years later, the survival rate of boys wastwice that of girls, despite the fact that polioaffects equal numbers of males and females,thus suggesting gender bias in care. 46 In China,the sex ratio is unbalanced in favour of boys(117 to 100), with this being contributed to byinfanticide. 47Sexual violenceThe WHO estimates that 150 million girlsand 73 million boys under 18 have experiencedforced sexual intercourse or other formsof sexual violence involving physical contact, 48though this is certainly an underestimate.Much of this sexual violence is inflicted byfamily members or other people residing inor visiting a child’s family home – people normallytrusted by children and often responsiblefor their care.A review of epidemiological surveys from 21countries, mainly high- and middle-incomecountries, found that at least 7% of females(ranging up to 36%) and 3% of males (rangingup to 29%) reported sexual victimisationduring their childhood. 49 According to thesestudies, between 14% and 56% of the sexualabuse of girls, and up to 25% of the sexualabuse of boys, was perpetrated by relatives orstep-parents. In many places, adults are outspokenabout the risk of sexual violence their childrenface at school or at play in the community,but rarely do adults speak of children’s risk ofsexual abuse within the home and family context.The shame, secrecy and denial associated

3shoe, wooden spoon, etc. But it can also involve,for example, kicking, shaking or throwing<strong>children</strong>, scratching, pinching, biting, pullinghair or boxing ears, forcing <strong>children</strong> to stay inuncomfortable positions, burning, scalding orforced ingestion (for example, washing <strong>children</strong>’smouths out with soap or forcing themto swallow hot spices). The Committee comments:“In the view of the Committee, corporalpunishment is invariably degrading. Inaddition, there are other non-physical forms ofpunishment which are also cruel and degradingand thus incompatible with the CRC. Theseinclude, for example, punishment which belittles,humiliates, denigrates, scapegoats, threatens,scares or ridicules the child.” 35There are considerable variations in popularviews about the use and effectiveness ofcorporal punishment, according to availablestudies. While a Canadian study found that59% of people believed that spanking is harmfuland 86% that it is ineffective, 36 researchin the USA found that 84% agreed “that itis sometimes necessary to discipline a childwith a good hard spanking.” 37,38 A study in theRepublic of Korea found that 90% of parentsthought corporal punishment ‘necessary’. 39 Ina report from Yemen, almost 90% of <strong>children</strong>said that physical and humiliating punishmentis the main method of discipline in the family,with the most common form being beating. 40What <strong>children</strong> think about corporal punishmentThe Save the Children Alliance conducted research on physical and humiliating punishmentwith <strong>children</strong> around the world as a special contribution to the Study. Theresulting report found that overwhelmingly, the <strong>children</strong> disagreed with the idea thatsuch punishment accomplished anything positive. The report suggested that while<strong>children</strong> may comply with adults’ wishes immediately after being hit, “young <strong>children</strong>frequently do not remember why they are hit, and <strong>children</strong> will only refrain from themisbehaviour if they face an imminent threat of being hit. This sort of punishmentfrightens <strong>children</strong> into certain behaviours: it does not help <strong>children</strong> to want to behave,or teach them self-discipline or promote any alternative.” 41 In a survey undertaken byUNICEF in Europe and Central Asia, over 75% of <strong>children</strong> said that ‘hitting’ was‘never’ a good solution to problems at home. 42 In Regional Consultations for the Study,<strong>children</strong> repeatedly called for other methods of discipline, including being offered aproper explanation of what they had done wrong. They underlined how hurtful it wasto be hit and humiliated by those who professed to love and care for them.53Violence <strong>against</strong> <strong>children</strong> in the home and family

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!