12.07.2015 Views

Will the Real Meaning of Affect Please Stand Up?

Will the Real Meaning of Affect Please Stand Up?

Will the Real Meaning of Affect Please Stand Up?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 EditorialRundmo, T. (2002) Associations between affect and risk perception, Journal <strong>of</strong> Risk Research, 5, pp.119–135.Rundmo, T. and Sjöberg, L. (1998) Risk perception by <strong>of</strong>fshore oil personnel related to platformmovements, Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 111–118.Sjöberg, L. (1979) Strength <strong>of</strong> belief and risk, Policy Sciences, 11, pp. 39–57.Sjöberg, L. (1980a) The risks <strong>of</strong> risk analysis, Acta Psychologica, 45, pp. 301–321.Sjöberg, L. (1980b) Volitional problems in carrying through a difficult decision, Acta Psychologica, 45,pp. 123–132.Sjöberg, L. (1992) Psychological reactions to a nuclear accident, in: J. Baarli (Ed.) Conference on Theradiological and radiation protection problems in Nordic regions, Tromsö 21–22 November, 1991,pp. Paper 12 (Oslo: Nordic Society for Radiation Protection).Sjöberg, L. (1996) Riskuppfattning och inställning till svenskt medlemskap i EU. (Risk Perception andAttitude to Swedish Membership in <strong>the</strong> EU) (Stockholm: Styrelsen för Psykologiskt Försvar).Sjöberg, L. (1998) Worry and risk perception, Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 85–93.Sjöberg, L. (1999a) Attitudes, opinions and values: models and dynamics, in: P. Juslin & H. Montgomery(Eds) Judgment and Decision Making: Neo-Brunswikian and Process-Tracing Approaches, pp.219–242 (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).Sjöberg, L. (1999b) Consequences <strong>of</strong> perceived risk: Demand for mitigation, Journal <strong>of</strong> Risk Research, 2,pp. 129–149.Sjöberg, L. (2000a) Consequences matter, ‘‘risk’’ is marginal, Journal <strong>of</strong> Risk Research, 3, pp. 287–295.Sjöberg, L. (2000b) Factors in risk perception, Risk Analysis, 20, pp. 1–11.Sjöberg, L. (2001a) Political decisions and public risk perception, Reliability Engineering and SystemsSafety, 72, pp. 115–124.Sjöberg, L. (2001b) Whose risk perception should influence decisions?, Reliability Engineering andSystems Safety, 72, pp. 149–152.Sjöberg, L. (2003) Risk perception, emotion, and policy: The case <strong>of</strong> nuclear technology, EuropeanReview, 11, pp. 109–128.Sjöberg, L. (2005) The perceived risk <strong>of</strong> terrorism, Risk Management: An Internnational Journal, 7(1),pp. 43–61.Sjöberg, L. and Biel, A. (1983) Mood and belief-value correlation, Acta Psychologica, 53, pp. 253–270.Sjöberg, L. and Montgomery, H. (1999) Double denial in attitude formation, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied SocialPsychology, 29, pp. 606–621.Slovic, P. (1987) Perception <strong>of</strong> risk, Science, 236, pp. 280–285.Slovic, P., Fischh<strong>of</strong>f, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1980) Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk, in: R.Schwing & J. Albers (Eds) Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?, pp. 181–214(New York: Plenum).Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185,pp. 1124–1131.Zajonc, R. B. (1998) Emotions, in: D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds) The Handbook <strong>of</strong> SocialPsychology, Vol. 1, pp. 591–632 (Boston: McGraw-Hill).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!