12.07.2015 Views

T - Voice For The Defense Online

T - Voice For The Defense Online

T - Voice For The Defense Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IS.\TZd 420,423 (Tex App. -Amtin 1998, pet. r&d) (wke out of state DWI conviction did not quatrfy as pilor comictionunder statute, district co~ulonly had jurisdrction to ttmsfer cause lo n~isdenleaim court).MREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defenda~d prays Iht tile indictment be qttashed and fi~rthcr that the ause be tmnskl.red to a court vith tdsdemeanorju~isdiction.<strong>The</strong> above signature cenifies that on the - day o f ,CBRTIPICATB OF SERVICE20-, a true and correct copy of tl~e foregoing donrmeut was sent to the Stale'sAttotneyCAUSE NO.THB SATE OF TEXAS @ IN THB JUDICIAL§J'S. 5 DISTRICI' COURT OEORDER ON b1OTION TO QUASH CHARGAnG Lh'STRUhIENThVDTO lTlE JURISDIGI'IOA' OF 1WE COURTOn this day m e on to be l~eard the forcgoiug hbtion to Q11as11 Charging Instlmient and Plea to the Jurisdiction of the Court, and Ihe Court havingheard and considered the same:IT IS OllDERED that the nrotio~l is hereby:And if said hlotionis granted the Char ing h~stroment pending in said cause is hereby Quashed and transferred to thea court wit11 misdemeanor jurisdiction. 1 PSigned this -(lay of ,20-.BKIEF IN SUPPORT OF illOTION TO QUASH ANDPLEA TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COUKSI.INTRODUCTIOXTl~c Defend;~~~t chdenges the jurisdiction of this Court because the indictnlent charges only a ill is demeanor. Prior co~~riclio~~s alleged to vestfelony jurisdiction are essential elements of the offense. <strong>The</strong> jodg~nent dleged in the indictmn~t docs not co~~laie the ~~~a~~rlato~).:~tfilrnnti~~e finding offanilyviolence. Hecmse tlus faclual issue is required to be resolved at the time of the prior conviction, it IIW~ not be proved a later prosecution. Tlus Courtlacks subject matter jurisdictio~~ over llle misrlc~~~eanor offense cllargetl in the indiclmet~t.11.OFFEXSE CHt\RGEDa. Reonirements of Felony AssaultTile indict~nent in this case altenlpts to cllarge a felony offelm under Scc. 22.01, Tes. Penal Code Ann. (Supp. 2001). That statute provides, io relcvantpart, zs follo\vs:",(b) An otfense under Subsection (a) (I) is a Class A mistle~neanor, except ti~athe offense is a felony of the tl~ir degree if the offense is commitledagainst:(2) a n~e~nber of tile defe~~dant's fmily or llousehold, if it is shown on the trial of the offense tllat the tlefel~cla~~l ilas been previously conrlcledof an offense against a member of the defendant's faniig or housel~old under this seclion.(e) 711 Illis sectiow(I) "Fas~ily" has tile me;u~ing assigned by Section 71.003, Failllily Code.(2) "Household" has li~e nleaning assigned by Seclio~l 71.005, Palnily Code. Id, hsa~~lt is ortli~larily a ~~~istle~~~eanor. Id i\ fa11uIy violenceassault call be a felo~~y within the district court's j~~risdictio~~ only if the i~~dicto~ent allcgcs a qualiI)ing prior cowiction. Id.SEPTEMBER 2001 \nrWW.TCDLA.COM VOICE FOR THE DEFENSE 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!