The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

gulbenkian.org.uk
from gulbenkian.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

6 Assessment, evaluation and accountability127 Reasons The debate about education has grown in part from publicfor the demand for schools to be more accountable — to showchapter results. There is an understandable and legitimate pressureon teachers to assess and evaluate their work with children.There is a danger in thinking that this can always be doneeffectively through formal tests and examinations. Ourarguments in this report have clear implications in theseareas of assessment, evaluation and accountability whichwe hope to make clear in this chapter. We begin by lookingat the need for accountability. We then distinguish betweenassessment and evaluation looking at some of the processesinvolved. We look particularly at how these apply to thearts and offer some strategies for meeting the demands ofaccountability.128 The We firmly endorse the principle of educational accountability.need for Parents and employers have vested interests in education andaccount- a right and a need to be kept informed of children's progressability and attainment in all areas of the curriculum, including thearts. This need for information lies at the centre of what wehave to say. The basic demands from parents and employersare reasonable enough. They are fora adequate teaching of certain skillsb continuing improvements in the general standard ofeducational attainmente adequate information to be made available aboutpupils' actual achievements and personal potentialA positive response to these demands in the schools canonly help to raise the level of public understanding about,and involvement in, education. The problem is to ensurethat the forms of accountability — the actual measures81

used — are appropriate to the work being done and that theyhelp to develop and improve educational provision ratherthan restrict and distort it. Some demands for accountabilitycan damage the educational interests they seek toserve.129 Two We dispute two arguments. First, the best way to raise thefalse level of basic skills in literacy and numeracy is to narrow thearguments curriculum so that these subjects become the predominantarea of attention. Second, the most reliable guide to thequality of education can be found in public examinationresults. A corollary of this is that 'standards' are best improvedby increasing the pressures of public examinations. There iscertainly a need to comb out some of the tangles in thecurriculum, but the real issue is how to improve the overallquality and general balance of education. This is the legitimateprovince of accountability. What forms of assessment andevaluation are needed for this? The functions of assessmentand evaluation are sometimes seen as synonymous, but theyare different and need to be considered separately. We startwith assessment.130 Assess- The principal function of assessment in schools is to providement information about pupils' abilities and levels of attainment.This fulfils an important role in keeping parents, staff andpupils alert to current levels of work. Assessment may takemany forms. Informally, teachers are assessing pupils all thetime, as indeed the pupils are assessing teachers — throughstyles of speech, attitudes to others and to work done.Assessments may also be formal. This is often associated withliteral or numerical grades, percentages and rank positions.These are not essential to assessment. In principle, theform and method of assessment should vary with the activityand the type of information sought. Assessments of pupilsare not, however, nor can they be, statements of absoluteability. They are statements about achievements within theframework of educational opportunities that have actuallybeen provided. In some degree every assessment of a pupil isalso an assessment of the teachers and of the school.131 Evalu- Because of this, schools need constantly to review the qualityation of provision and their methods of work. This, broadly, isthe function of educational evaluation. It is a more generalprocess than assessment in that it looks beyond the pupilsto the style, the materials and the circumstances of teachingand learning. If teachers need to assess pupils they also needto evaluate their own practice. Although they have differentpurposes, assessment and evaluation are obviously linked.82

used — are appropriate to the work be<strong>in</strong>g done and that theyhelp to develop and improve educational provision ratherthan restrict and distort it. Some demands for accountabilitycan damage the educational <strong>in</strong>terests they seek toserve.129 Two We dispute two arguments. First, the best way to raise thefalse level of basic skills <strong>in</strong> literacy and numeracy is to narrow thearguments curriculum so that these subjects become the predom<strong>in</strong>antarea of attention. Second, the most reliable guide to thequality of education can be found <strong>in</strong> public exam<strong>in</strong>ationresults. A corollary of this is that 'standards' are best improvedby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the pressures of public exam<strong>in</strong>ations. <strong>The</strong>re iscerta<strong>in</strong>ly a need to comb out some of the tangles <strong>in</strong> thecurriculum, but the real issue is how to improve the overallquality and general balance of education. This is the legitimateprov<strong>in</strong>ce of accountability. What forms of assessment andevaluation are needed for this? <strong>The</strong> functions of assessmentand evaluation are sometimes seen as synonymous, but theyare different and need to be considered separately. We startwith assessment.130 Assess- <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal function of assessment <strong>in</strong> schools is to providement <strong>in</strong>formation about pupils' abilities and levels of atta<strong>in</strong>ment.This fulfils an important role <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g parents, staff andpupils alert to current levels of work. Assessment may takemany forms. Informally, teachers are assess<strong>in</strong>g pupils all thetime, as <strong>in</strong>deed the pupils are assess<strong>in</strong>g teachers — throughstyles of speech, attitudes to others and to work done.Assessments may also be formal. This is often associated withliteral or numerical grades, percentages and rank positions.<strong>The</strong>se are not essential to assessment. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, theform and method of assessment should vary with the activityand the type of <strong>in</strong>formation sought. Assessments of pupilsare not, however, nor can they be, statements of absoluteability. <strong>The</strong>y are statements about achievements with<strong>in</strong> theframework of educational opportunities that have actuallybeen provided. In some degree every assessment of a pupil isalso an assessment of the teachers and of the school.131 Evalu- Because of this, schools need constantly to review the qualityation of provision and their methods of work. This, broadly, isthe function of educational evaluation. It is a more generalprocess than assessment <strong>in</strong> that it looks beyond the pupilsto the style, the materials and the circumstances of teach<strong>in</strong>gand learn<strong>in</strong>g. If teachers need to assess pupils they also needto evaluate their own practice. Although they have differentpurposes, assessment and evaluation are obviously l<strong>in</strong>ked.82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!