12.07.2015 Views

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the vitality of artistic traditions. Raymond Williams describesthree levels <strong>in</strong> the general def<strong>in</strong>ition of culture. <strong>The</strong>se beardirectly on the idea of the cultural 'heritage'."<strong>The</strong>re is the lived culture of a particular time and place,only fully accessible to those liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> that time andplace. <strong>The</strong>re is the recorded culture of every k<strong>in</strong>d of artto the most everyday facts: the culture of a period. <strong>The</strong>reis also, as the factor connect<strong>in</strong>g lived culture and periodcultures, the culture of the selective tradition.' (Williams,1971,p66)54 <strong>The</strong> We live <strong>in</strong> a perpetual present tense. Our knowledge ofselective other periods can never match their vast complexity astradition they were experienced and understood at the time. Ourevaluation and perception of them is both partial and highlyselective. As Williams po<strong>in</strong>ts out, most specialists <strong>in</strong> a periodknow only a part even of its written records.'One can say with confidence for example that nobodyreally knows the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century novel: nobody hasread, or could read, all its examples over the whole rangefrom pr<strong>in</strong>ted volumes to penny serials. <strong>The</strong> real specialistmay know some hundreds . . . (but) a selective process ofa quite drastic k<strong>in</strong>d is at once evident and this is true ofevery field of activity.' (Williams, 1971, p66)<strong>The</strong> selective tradition <strong>in</strong> this way rejects 'considerableareas of what was once a liv<strong>in</strong>g culture'. (Williams, 1971, p68)Consequently what we <strong>in</strong>clude and acknowledge <strong>in</strong> thetradition is always open to change and revision. This isnot only because of the discovery of new <strong>in</strong>formation or newworks, it is also often because of changes <strong>in</strong> our contemporaryvalues. Individuals long forgotten or overlooked may bere-<strong>in</strong>terpreted as key agents of cultural progress because ofa shift <strong>in</strong> current fashion or political outlook. <strong>The</strong> strongsentiment and self-assurance of Raphael, for example, endearedhim to many Victorians as the central figure <strong>in</strong> theRenaissance. <strong>The</strong>re are those today who th<strong>in</strong>k more ofMichaelangelo — for his restless self-doubt — and buildtheir image of the period around him. In these ways thecultural tradition <strong>in</strong> all areas of social life can be seen as a'cont<strong>in</strong>ual selection and re-selection of ancestors'. Andevery selection from the past is also an <strong>in</strong>terpretation of it.55 <strong>The</strong> arts Education needs to take account of this important diversityand of cultures, of their organic patterns of growth and of theculturaleducationrestlessness of their traditions. A cultural education, there-fore, is one which39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!