The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

gulbenkian.org.uk
from gulbenkian.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Among these various symbolic modes of communication,by which we formulate and express our understandingsof the world, each is distinguishable from the rest. Eachhas its characteristic 'logic', its own 'grammar' and 'syntax'.In true language fashion, each generates its own 'literature'.Each is basic to human rationality in all its diversity.By "rationality' we do not mean merely deductive logicof discursive reasoning. We mean the many differentconventionalised ways in which, as human beings, wehave learned to communicate — through noises, marks,and signs — our ideas and feelings to other people. Someof these do not require verbal communication at all:there are whole 'languages' of meaning which have nodirect need of words. They are, nonetheless, exceedinglyrich and complex forms of talking to other people.The language' of dance is a sophisticated example ofthis.14 The Human rationality includes all these various forms of thinkneedfor ing, communication and action. If individuals fail to enterbalance into any of these 'communities of discourse', the developmentof their rationality will be, to that extent, lop-sided.In stressing this very point, W D Hudson (1973) goes furtherand remarks that someone who had no conception of beautyor of moral obligation would be, to that extent, sub-human.This is a hard saying, but we agree with the spirit of it. Indoing so we follow a tradition at least as old as Aristotle,who saw it as a mark of the educated person to be able torecognise the different ways in which our perceptions of theworld are organised and communicated and to understandthe various conventions and standards of judgement in eachof them. 1This thesis has recently been developed by a number ofeducationalists and philosophers, for all of whom the fundamentalpoint is the same: that human rationality comprisesa number of different forms or modes of understandingand communication through which we interpret and makesense of ourselves, of others and of the world itself. For SirHerbert Read (1957) there are four; for Paul Hirst (1965)seven; for the HMIs (1979) eight; for Louis Arnaud Reid(1957) an undefined number of ways in which we haveknowledge. The point is always the same — that some understandingof, and in, each of these is necessary if we are tohave that range of intelligences and feelings that enablesus 'to see life steady and to see it whole'. To be fully educated,as T S Eliot noted, is to have some sense of where everythingfits. 2 19

15 The arts This is the ground on which our first argument is based:and that one of these distinct categories of understanding andaesthetic achievement — the aesthetic and creative — is exemplifieddevelopment by the arts: music, drama, literature, poetry, dance, sculptureand the graphic arts. 3 Not to attempt at some stage,and in some form, to involve children in the arts is simplyto fail to educate them as fully developed, intelligent andfeeling human beings. Certainly we must have an educationin number, in science, in English and in modern languages:but we must have one in the arts as well.16 The arts A critic might remark, of course, that there are other formsand moral of rationality — pornography or witchcraft for example —education that may be quite as meaningful as the different modes ofexperience and understanding we have listed above. Whynot have these on the school curriculum? Provision for thearts in the school curriculum is a logical requirement ofgeneral education. We are prepared to go further than this,however, for our concern is also with schools as agencies ofcultural education (see Chapter 3). In this respect it is clearthat questions of value are also involved. The purposes ofeducation include moral purposes. As Mary Warnock hasnoted:'. . . education is concerned with the right raising ofchildren, and with the provision for them of a goodfuture, and here if anywhere moral values appear to beinextricably involved.' (Wamock, 1977, p41)Thus we come to a second group of arguments. Not onlydo we maintain that education in the arts is a matter oflogical necessity, we also judge it to be absolutely desirablebecause of the values which these forms of thought andaction exemplify. There are value judgements here and weare prepared to defend them. For what we are recommendingis a course of action that we believe will promote the welfareof our society.17 The arts Our first argument is an historical one. No proper underandstanding of the contemporary world and of our society iscultural possible without having some knowledge and understandingdevelopment of the roots of the traditions and the institutions which weinherit. Our culture stands on the shoulders of all that hasgone before. For this reason, we can only fully appreciatethe meaning of the present and grasp the possibilities of thefuture by hooking onto the frameworks of the past. Inscience, for example, the meaning and the significance ofEinstein and Relativity Theory has to be seen against the20

Among these various symbolic modes of communication,by which we formulate and express our understand<strong>in</strong>gsof the world, each is dist<strong>in</strong>guishable from the rest. Eachhas its characteristic 'logic', its own 'grammar' and 'syntax'.In true language fashion, each generates its own 'literature'.Each is basic to human rationality <strong>in</strong> all its diversity.By "rationality' we do not mean merely deductive logicof discursive reason<strong>in</strong>g. We mean the many differentconventionalised ways <strong>in</strong> which, as human be<strong>in</strong>gs, wehave learned to communicate — through noises, marks,and signs — our ideas and feel<strong>in</strong>gs to other people. Someof these do not require verbal communication at all:there are whole 'languages' of mean<strong>in</strong>g which have nodirect need of words. <strong>The</strong>y are, nonetheless, exceed<strong>in</strong>glyrich and complex forms of talk<strong>in</strong>g to other people.<strong>The</strong> language' of dance is a sophisticated example ofthis.14 <strong>The</strong> Human rationality <strong>in</strong>cludes all these various forms of th<strong>in</strong>kneedfor <strong>in</strong>g, communication and action. If <strong>in</strong>dividuals fail to enterbalance <strong>in</strong>to any of these 'communities of discourse', the developmentof their rationality will be, to that extent, lop-sided.In stress<strong>in</strong>g this very po<strong>in</strong>t, W D Hudson (1973) goes furtherand remarks that someone who had no conception of beautyor of moral obligation would be, to that extent, sub-human.This is a hard say<strong>in</strong>g, but we agree with the spirit of it. Indo<strong>in</strong>g so we follow a tradition at least as old as Aristotle,who saw it as a mark of the educated person to be able torecognise the different ways <strong>in</strong> which our perceptions of theworld are organised and communicated and to understandthe various conventions and standards of judgement <strong>in</strong> eachof them. 1This thesis has recently been developed by a number ofeducationalists and philosophers, for all of whom the fundamentalpo<strong>in</strong>t is the same: that human rationality comprisesa number of different forms or modes of understand<strong>in</strong>gand communication through which we <strong>in</strong>terpret and makesense of ourselves, of others and of the world itself. For SirHerbert Read (1957) there are four; for Paul Hirst (1965)seven; for the HMIs (1979) eight; for Louis Arnaud Reid(1957) an undef<strong>in</strong>ed number of ways <strong>in</strong> which we haveknowledge. <strong>The</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t is always the same — that some understand<strong>in</strong>gof, and <strong>in</strong>, each of these is necessary if we are tohave that range of <strong>in</strong>telligences and feel<strong>in</strong>gs that enablesus 'to see life steady and to see it whole'. To be fully educated,as T S Eliot noted, is to have some sense of where everyth<strong>in</strong>gfits. 2 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!