The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

gulbenkian.org.uk
from gulbenkian.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

164 For and It will be simplest if we state each argument (A) and offeragainst our response (R).special a (A) To take away or separate the most artisticallyprovision gifted from the general school population is to impoverishthe life of a school.(R) The general artistic life of a school should notdepend on the chance presence of exceptionally giftedchildren.b (A) To segregate the gifted child is to inhibit his or hergeneral education and ability to mix with others.(R) Experience suggests the contrary. Where childrenare doing what they most want to do and can seethemselves progressing, they are relieved of frustrationand conflict with their environment, gain in strengthand are able to launch themselves at other tasks withfresh confidence and enterprise.e (A) Really gifted people will get through anyway, orteach themselves.(R) This is true only of a very few cases. For the rest,lack of special help usually means wasted potential.In any case, this argument gives all the advantages tothe middle class and to those with the best educationalenvironments, thus compounding social inequalities.d (A) Selective schools or special classes are sociallydivisive.(R) There is no evidence to show this provided parentsaccept that selection is a genuine attempt to find aneducation best suited to their gifted child, and providedsuch selection does not imply or lead to less concern forthe less gifted.e (A) Special provision and special teaching take away thebest teachers from those who most need them.(R) In every country, particularly at secondary level,there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists, capablenot only of inspiring gifts and talents in the arts, but ofbut of teaching them at all. One solution to this problemis to make particular use of such teachers for the childrenwhom they alone can help. In any case, on what principleof psychology, education or morals could we regard itas right to ignore or frustrate the unusual talents ofsome children because other children do not showthem?165 Three To summarise, there are three reasons for concerning ourreasonsfor selves in some degree with gifts and talents in the arts. First,concern concern for artistic gifts and talents is a logical developmentof any general concern for the arts. Second, if this reporthelps towards a wider application of the arts in education,99

it is likely that more children will be found to reveal artisticgifts and talents requiring nourishment. Third, gifted childrenremain widely misunderstood or ignored as a category.We do not accept the charge of elitism in this contextbecause we are not postulating the gifted versus the nongifted.All children may have gifts of some kind. These needto be discovered and developed to the best of their, and our,ability. Thus there are two dimensions to the question ofgifts and talents at school:a how to increase general exposure to the arts and theopportunity to enjoy and participate in them to anextent that we can say the educational process genuinelyprovides an opportunity for gifts and talents to revealthemselves in every area at every social level? Thesolution to this problem is implicit in our considerationof the arts and the curriculumb having provided this opportunity, how best to identifygifts and talents and encourage their development?166 Helping No firm line can be drawn between the gifted and talented.gifts and All the more important, therefore, that local educationtalents: the authorities should create the circumstances at authority androles of the at school level within which the artistic talents of all youngschool people can be encouraged.100a IdentificationThe very gifted frequently identify themselves at anearly age. Others need the help of identification byparents, relatives or teachers. It is the school's job to beable to recognise such gifts and talents and to arrangeappropriate support with help from parents and thelocal education authority. To help in this the Devoneducation authority, for example, now provides guidancein identification and has established two centres towhich primary-age children, thus identified, can go forhalf a day a week for extra tuition.b Extra tuitionIn the later years of primary education and throughoutsecondary education children gifted in the arts willneed special training in their art and special arrangementsto balance this training against the demands of generaleducation. Such arrangements in ordinary schools mayinclude, dropping some subjects to provide more time topractise a particular skill, or time off for specialisttuition.Arts specialists seem undecided whether this trainingcan be best given within the ordinary school system or

164 For and It will be simplest if we state each argument (A) and offeraga<strong>in</strong>st our response (R).special a (A) To take away or separate the most artisticallyprovision gifted from the general school population is to impoverishthe life of a school.(R) <strong>The</strong> general artistic life of a school should notdepend on the chance presence of exceptionally giftedchildren.b (A) To segregate the gifted child is to <strong>in</strong>hibit his or hergeneral education and ability to mix with others.(R) Experience suggests the contrary. Where childrenare do<strong>in</strong>g what they most want to do and can seethemselves progress<strong>in</strong>g, they are relieved of frustrationand conflict with their environment, ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> strengthand are able to launch themselves at other tasks withfresh confidence and enterprise.e (A) Really gifted people will get through anyway, orteach themselves.(R) This is true only of a very few cases. For the rest,lack of special help usually means wasted potential.In any case, this argument gives all the advantages tothe middle class and to those with the best educationalenvironments, thus compound<strong>in</strong>g social <strong>in</strong>equalities.d (A) Selective schools or special classes are sociallydivisive.(R) <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence to show this provided parentsaccept that selection is a genu<strong>in</strong>e attempt to f<strong>in</strong>d aneducation best suited to their gifted child, and providedsuch selection does not imply or lead to less concern forthe less gifted.e (A) Special provision and special teach<strong>in</strong>g take away thebest teachers from those who most need them.(R) In every country, particularly at secondary level,there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists, capablenot only of <strong>in</strong>spir<strong>in</strong>g gifts and talents <strong>in</strong> the arts, but ofbut of teach<strong>in</strong>g them at all. One solution to this problemis to make particular use of such teachers for the childrenwhom they alone can help. In any case, on what pr<strong>in</strong>cipleof psychology, education or morals could we regard itas right to ignore or frustrate the unusual talents ofsome children because other children do not showthem?165 Three To summarise, there are three reasons for concern<strong>in</strong>g ourreasonsfor selves <strong>in</strong> some degree with gifts and talents <strong>in</strong> the arts. First,concern concern for artistic gifts and talents is a logical developmentof any general concern for the arts. Second, if this reporthelps towards a wider application of the arts <strong>in</strong> education,99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!